Part, Question
1 1, 1 | whatever our Head has done is a type of what we ought to ~do.
2 1, 15 | two ends: either to be the type of that of which it is called
3 1, 15 | knows it as the ~particular type and idea of that creature;
4 1, 15 | as it is the likeness or type of this or ~that thing.
5 1, 15 | thereby ~understands the type or idea of the house. Now
6 1, 15 | it is properly called a "type," and may belong to speculative ~
7 1, 15 | according to their proper type, ~in so far as they are
8 1, 15 | God not through its own type, but through the type of
9 1, 15 | own type, but through the type of good. Evil, therefore,
10 1, 15 | an "exemplar" nor as a "type."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[15] A[
11 1, 15 | so far as it denotes a "type."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[15] A[
12 1, 18 | Him, or as having their type in Him. They are known ~
13 1, 22 | thus it behooves that the type of every effect should ~
14 1, 22 | it ~is necessary that the type of the order of things towards
15 1, 22 | the divine mind: and the type of things ordered ~towards
16 1, 22 | He is the last ~end. This type of order in things towards
17 1, 22 | Providence is the divine type itself, seated in the Supreme
18 1, 22 | may refer either to the type of ~the order of things
19 1, 22 | towards an end, or to the type of the order of parts ~in
20 1, 22 | is nothing less than the type of the order of things towards
21 1, 22 | providence - namely, the type of the ~order of things
22 1, 22 | that He has beforehand the type of those effects in His ~
23 1, 23 | in God; as in Him is the type of ~the order of all things
24 1, 23 | be ~providence. Now the type in the mind of the doer
25 1, 23 | thing to be done. Hence the type ~of the aforesaid direction
26 1, 23 | things provided for; but is a type in the mind of the provider,
27 1, 23 | predestination is a ~kind of type of the ordering of some
28 1, 32 | but as meaning the ideal type whereby God made ~all things,
29 1, 45 | of the Persons are the ~type of the productions of creatures
30 1, 45 | some way the ~cause and type of creation; as appears
31 1, 55 | lit. ii, 8) that, "As the type, according to ~which the
32 1, 55 | the knowledge of the same type exists ~first in the intellectual
33 1, 55 | same cannot be the proper type of many. But if the ~higher
34 1, 55 | the proper and adequate type of several ~things. But
35 1, 55 | can be taken as the proper type and ~likeness of many. Just
36 1, 55 | be taken as the proper ~type and likeness of that prudence
37 1, 55 | fashion taken ~as the proper type of each thing contained
38 1, 55 | according to its proper type. The same applies to the ~
39 1, 65 | self-subsisting forms of the same type, as the Platonists held,
40 1, 71 | creatures of intermediate type between ~the animals of
41 1, 46 | of the Persons are the ~type of the productions of creatures
42 1, 46 | some way the ~cause and type of creation; as appears
43 1, 56 | lit. ii, 8) that, "As the type, according to ~which the
44 1, 56 | the knowledge of the same type exists ~first in the intellectual
45 1, 56 | same cannot be the proper type of many. But if the ~higher
46 1, 56 | the proper and adequate type of several ~things. But
47 1, 56 | can be taken as the proper type and ~likeness of many. Just
48 1, 56 | be taken as the proper ~type and likeness of that prudence
49 1, 56 | fashion taken ~as the proper type of each thing contained
50 1, 56 | according to its proper type. The same applies to the ~
51 1, 66 | self-subsisting forms of the same type, as the Platonists held,
52 1, 71 | creatures of intermediate type between ~the animals of
53 1, 92 | an image of the exemplar type thereof ~in the Divine mind.
54 2, 74 | rendered by the English 'type,' because St. ~Thomas was
55 2, 74 | the ~creature. Hence the type or idea is a rule of conduct,
56 2, 93 | eternal law is a sovereign type [*Ratio] existing in God?~
57 2, 93 | eternal law is not a sovereign type ~existing in God. For there
58 2, 93 | each thing according to its type." Therefore the ~eternal
59 2, 93 | law does not seem to be a type existing in the Divine mind.~
60 2, 93 | FP, Q[34], A[1]: whereas type refers to the Essence. ~
61 2, 93 | not the same as a Divine type.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[93] A[
62 2, 93 | the same as the idea of a type. Therefore the eternal law
63 2, 93 | the same as the sovereign type. ~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[93] A[
64 2, 93 | eternal ~law is the sovereign type, to which we must always
65 2, 93 | artificer there pre-exists a type of the ~things that are
66 2, 93 | there must ~pre-exist the type of the order of those things
67 2, 93 | government. And just as the type of the ~things yet to be
68 2, 93 | of that art, so too the type in him who governs the acts
69 2, 93 | A[5]. Wherefore as the ~type of the Divine Wisdom, inasmuch
70 2, 93 | exemplar or idea; so the type of Divine Wisdom, as ~moving
71 2, 93 | is nothing else than the type of Divine ~Wisdom, as directing
72 2, 93 | law is one since it is the type ~of this order.~Aquin.:
73 2, 93 | of the kinship ~between type and word.~Aquin.: SMT FS
74 2, 93 | true in itself; and its type is truth itself.~Aquin.:
75 2, 93 | But the eternal law is a type existing ~in the Divine
76 2, 93 | Divine providence." But the type of Divine providence is
77 2, 93 | decree just things." But the type of Divine Wisdom is the ~
78 2, 93 | is Divine providence as a type. But many ~necessary things
79 2, 93 | the eternal law is the type of ~the Divine government.
80 2, 93 | rather be called their ~type [ratio].~Aquin.: SMT FS
81 2, 93 | eternal law, is the supreme type, as stated ~above (A[1]).
82 2, 93 | since the eternal law is the type of Divine providence, as
83 2, 2 | Samaritans to the woman, who is a type of human reason: "We now ~
84 2, 83 | typified in him. ~Isaac was a type of Christ, being himself
85 2, 171 | with the mind's eye ~the type both of our being and of
86 2, 171 | Divine essence is Itself the type of all things that are ~
87 2, 171 | that are ~made - the ideal type adding nothing to the Divine
88 2, 171 | see in the First Truth the type of his ~existence, in so
89 3, 31 | Lk. 3:23, "they are the type of the twofold life of man: ~
90 3, 31 | of ~which Phares is the type. The brethren of Jechonias
91 3, 33 | the Temple, which was a type of His body, is said to ~
92 Suppl, 79| one of two things is the type of the other, the ~attention
93 Suppl, 79| apprehended by the saints as the type of all ~things that will
94 Suppl, 89| mirror, ~because He is the type and image of all. Therefore
95 Suppl, 89| Divine essence ~which is the type of all things is united
96 Suppl, 89| united thereto not as the type of all things, but as the ~
97 Suppl, 89| all things, but as the ~type of some and of so much the
98 Suppl, 89| the Divine essence is the type of all things ~knowable
99 Suppl, 89| according as it ~is the type of all. Hence the objection
|