Part, Question

 1   1, 1   |       allowed the putting away of wives - namely, on account of
 2   2, 28  |         jealous of [zelare] their wives, ~because they will not
 3   2, 28  |       said to be jealous of their wives, lest association with others
 4   2, 104 |         instance, about servants, wives and ~children: this is the
 5   2, 105 |          chariots and horses, nor wives, nor immense wealth: because ~
 6   2, 105 |          Para. 2/3~With regard to wives the Law made certain prescriptions
 7   2, 105 |         it prescribed in what way wives were to be treated after
 8   2, 105 |          9 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 9: Wives break their conjugal faith
 9   2, 25  |           men ought to love their wives ~as their own bodies." Now
10   2, 98  |         no ~crime to have several wives, so long as it was the custom."
11   2, 151 |          of old and their several wives. Therefore not every venereal ~
12   2, 152 |      Zelpha the handmaids of ~his wives; and again (Gn. 38:18) that
13   2, 167 |      virgins and widows, but also wives and all women without exception, ~
14   2, 167 |         how they may please their wives, ~or wives how they may
15   2, 167 |           please their wives, ~or wives how they may please their
16   2, 167 |        says on this passage, "The wives of those who ~were in distress
17   2, 177 |          are signified by the two wives of ~Jacob; the active by
18   2, 184 |           injustice forsake their wives, whereas men could ~without
19   3, 80  |          them who had known their wives carnally, how much less
20 Suppl, 41|          That they . . . who have wives, be as if they had ~none."
21 Suppl, 41|    commanded not to go near their wives (Ex. ~19:20); and Jerome
22 Suppl, 41|          to have to do with their wives for ~that particular time;
23 Suppl, 55|           Porro duorum) that "the wives of two cousins are forbidden
24 Suppl, 55|        public honesty forbids the wives of two ~cousins to be married
25 Suppl, 59|         an unbeliever has several wives recognized by ~his law.
26 Suppl, 59| conversion he can retain ~several wives.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[59] A[
27 Suppl, 59|      Reply OBJ 4: To have several wives is contrary to the natural
28 Suppl, 59|            converted with all his wives, he may remain with the
29 Suppl, 59|         of a man who had ~several wives, because if he wish to be
30 Suppl, 60|         law commanded ~adulterous wives to be stoned. Now it is
31 Suppl, 60|          The slayers of their own wives must be brought back to
32 Suppl, 62|       that a husband have several wives: wherefore the ~latter has
33 Suppl, 64|   marriage debt; (2) plurality of wives; ~(3) bigamy; (4) the bill
34 Suppl, 64|          to keep away ~from their wives because thus is a deformed
35 Suppl, 64|          15): "Come not near your wives," when ~namely they were
36 Suppl, 64|       have intercourse with their wives at a time ~when they should
37 Suppl, 65|       Para. 1/1 - OF PLURALITY OF WIVES (FIVE ARTICLES)~We must
38 Suppl, 65|         consider the plurality of wives. Under this head there are ~
39 Suppl, 65|       natural law to have several wives?~(2) Whether this was ever
40 Suppl, 65|       natural law to have several wives?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
41 Suppl, 65|      natural law to have ~several wives. For custom does not prejudice
42 Suppl, 65|        not a sin" to have several wives "when this was the custom," ~
43 Suppl, 65|      natural law to have ~several wives.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
44 Suppl, 65|      commandment" to have several wives, ~"because by no law was
45 Suppl, 65|       natural law to have several wives.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
46 Suppl, 65|      natural law to have ~several wives.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
47 Suppl, 65|      natural law to have ~several wives.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
48 Suppl, 65|          one husband to have many wives.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
49 Suppl, 65|          natural law that several wives should ~share one husband.~
50 Suppl, 65|         Accordingly plurality ~of wives neither wholly destroys
51 Suppl, 65|           get children of several wives, ~and to rear the children
52 Suppl, 65|         in a family where several wives are joined to one ~husband,
53 Suppl, 65|          requisitions of ~several wives, and again because the sharing
54 Suppl, 65|           like manner the several wives of one ~husband. The third
55 Suppl, 65|            said that plurality of wives is in a way against the
56 Suppl, 65|          Accordingly plurality of wives, though not contrary to
57 Suppl, 65|         to show that plurality of wives is against the first principles
58 Suppl, 65|           that by ~taking several wives a man does not bind himself
59 Suppl, 65|           therefore plurality of ~wives is not against the first
60 Suppl, 65|           one man to have several wives is not ~contrary to the
61 Suppl, 65|         for a man to have several wives as for a ~wife to have several
62 Suppl, 65|       ever lawful to have several wives?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
63 Suppl, 65|           lawful to have several ~wives. For, according to the Philosopher (
64 Suppl, 65|         places." Now plurality of wives is ~forbidden by the natural
65 Suppl, 65|       took to ~themselves several wives, nor were reproached on
66 Suppl, 65|          man is joined to several wives, are greater goods than
67 Suppl, 65|         Law mentions plurality of wives without any prohibition ~
68 Suppl, 65|         21:15, "If a man have two wives," etc. ~Therefore they were
69 Suppl, 65|  transgressors through having two wives; and so it ~was lawful.~
70 Suppl, 65|        stated to have had several wives, and yet were most pleasing
71 Suppl, 65|             ad 7,8), plurality of wives is ~said to be against the
72 Suppl, 65|        forbidding a plurality of ~wives was framed, as stated above (
73 Suppl, 65|      never lawful to have several wives without having a ~dispensation
74 Suppl, 65|     remains faith towards several wives; and the ~sacrament remains
75 Suppl, 65|    nevertheless the plurality of ~wives signified the distinction
76 Suppl, 65|            lawful to have several wives. Therefore it has also been
77 Suppl, 65|          Therefore these were not wives, ~and consequently it was
78 Suppl, 65|           ad 7,8) to have several wives is not ~against the first
79 Suppl, 65|       which ~allowed them several wives, approached their bondswomen
80 Suppl, 65|        wife. For these women were wives as ~to the principal and
81 Suppl, 66|         in having ~two successive wives?~(2) Whether irregularity
82 Suppl, 66|     contracted by one who has two wives at once?~(3) Whether irregularity
83 Suppl, 66|       that consists in having two wives successively. For multitude
84 Suppl, 66|     plurality, ~a man who has two wives successively, the one in
85 Suppl, 66|          than one who has several wives ~successively. Yet in the
86 Suppl, 66|          a man has several lawful wives successively; ~the second
87 Suppl, 66|         is when a man has several wives at once, one in law, the
88 Suppl, 66|          The multitude of several wives at the same time is a ~multitude
89 Suppl, 66|  multitude of several ~successive wives is a multitude relatively,
90 Suppl, 66|          when one husband has two wives, ~one in law, the other
91 Suppl, 66|         when ~one husband has two wives at the same time, one in
92 Suppl, 66|         25): "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ also loved the
93 Suppl, 66|          if a man has had several wives before receiving Baptism,
94 Suppl, 66|          who have married several wives ~in fact, as if they had
95 Suppl, 67|     reference to the plurality of wives and so forth. But sometimes ~
96 Suppl, 67|          those who put away their wives, after giving them a bill
97 Suppl, 67|      dispensation to have several wives, but for the ~sake of preventing
98 Suppl, 67|           husband to have several wives at one ~time by virtue of