Part, Question
1 1, 11 | must adhere to the ~former statement; therefore we must say that
2 1, 16 | truth that exists in the ~statement - "that a person commits
3 1, 17 | in making it; for such a statement as "some ~reasonable animals
4 1, 17 | ii), the contrary of this statement "God ~is good," is, "God
5 1, 19 | necessity. ~For the conditional statement is true that if God wills
6 1, 19 | and every true conditional statement is necessary. It follows ~
7 1, 19 | conditional. For the ~conditional statement that if God wills a thing
8 1, 19 | to good is implied in the statement that it is a good thing
9 1, 27 | begotten; which is against the ~statement of Athanasius: "The Holy
10 1, 46 | can be eternal. And this statement is ~far from impossible
11 1, 64 | union of ~the Word. Such a statement deprives angels and saints
12 1, 66 | on which they base their statement. Strabus and ~Bede teach
13 1, 77 | subject of an accident. The ~statement quoted is verified in God,
14 1, 47 | can be eternal. And this statement is ~far from impossible
15 1, 65 | union of ~the Word. Such a statement deprives angels and saints
16 1, 67 | on which they base their statement. Strabus and ~Bede teach
17 1, 76 | subject of an accident. The ~statement quoted is verified in God,
18 1, 88 | far as what is false in statement or argument is ~contrary
19 1, 92 | referring to Augustine's statement ~(De Trin. xiv, 6), that "
20 1, 111 | in Evang.), quoting the ~statement of Dionysius (Coel. Hier.
21 1, 117 | the beginning. But this statement is false. ~Firstly, in the
22 1, 117 | Para. 2/3~Secondly, this statement can be proved to be false
23 2, 4 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 6: The statement made (Gen. ad lit. xii,
24 2, 14 | sitting is not a ~necessary statement; but that he is sitting,
25 2, 96 | will, according to the statement (Extra, De Constit. cap.
26 2, 106 | says, explaining what this statement is ~(Heb. 8:8,10): "For
27 2, 106 | notions ~are refuted by the statement (Jn. 7:39) that "as yet
28 2, 24 | answered in accordance with the statement ~made above (AA[2],3), that
29 2, 58 | the word "judgment" is a statement ~or decision of the just
30 2, 64 | Para. 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 1: The statement that theft is not a great
31 2, 66 | cannot remit, according to a ~statement of Pope Gelasius [*Callist.
32 2, 87 | order ~to show that the statement made issues from God's infallible
33 2, 93 | this is an unreasonable statement: since ~every corporeal
34 2, 96 | necessary for perjury that the statement confirmed on oath ~be false?~
35 2, 96 | necessary for perjury that the ~statement confirmed on oath be false.
36 2, 96 | Now in an oath a man's statement is confirmed by calling ~
37 2, 96 | lack of truth in the human statement which is ~confirmed on oath.~
38 2, 96 | of another who knows the statement to ~be false, and swears
39 2, 96 | another, who thinks his statement false, and swears to its
40 2, 98 | this is an ~unreasonable statement, because no one should obey
41 2, 107 | oneself, in so far as it is a ~statement of what is true, is good
42 2, 108 | deceive. Wherefore a false ~statement uttered with intent to deceive
43 2, 108 | and this manifestation or statement is an act of ~reason comparing
44 2, 108 | when this manifestation or ~statement is a moral act, it must
45 2, 108 | object of a manifestation or ~statement is the true or the false.
46 2, 108 | proper effect of a false statement, namely, that someone ~may
47 2, 108 | figuratively: because every statement must be referred to the ~
48 2, 116 | perjury" if he confirm his statement by oath; if he has recourse
49 2, 127 | on account of another's statement, but also on account of ~
50 2, 143 | and Ambrose makes the same statement (De ~Offic. ii, 6). Therefore
51 2, 156 | if it be ~inordinate. The statement of the Philosopher that "
52 2, 161 | pride. This agrees with the statement of Augustine, who says (
53 2, 161 | not believed the serpent's statement that they were debarred
54 2, 166 | is in agreement with the statement of the Philosopher (Ethic. ~
55 2, 178 | that we must understand the statement of Gregory that ~"contemplatives
56 2, 180 | action. Consequently the statement that "no ~sacrifice is more
57 2, 183 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This statement refers to the pursuits of
58 2, 186 | Statu Monach., after the statement that ~"canons regular are
59 2, 187 | from ~what follows that the statement that certain "heretics"
60 2, 187 | regular, according to the statement of Jerome ~(Ep. cxxv, ad
61 3, 46 | appears to tally with the statement (Jn. 13:1-5) that "before
62 3, 53 | not ~contrary to John's statement "when it was yet dark,"
63 3, 77 | 3/3~In like manner the statement advanced by others cannot
64 3, 78 | not known to us. But this statement cannot stand, because the
65 Suppl, 37| This is ~signified in the statement of 3 Kgs. 10:4,[5] that "
66 Suppl, 39| all the Orders. but this statement is not ~confirmed either
67 Suppl, 41| in all things, and this ~statement is not universally true,
68 Suppl, 47| makes a ~marriage, because a statement is not made simply if it
69 Suppl, 47| be certain. But where a statement is ~made under a condition
70 Suppl, 49| OBJ 4: The reason for this statement is not that man deserves
71 Suppl, 53| objection is based on a false statement: since order is ~everywhere
72 Suppl, 61| will, ~according to the statement of the Apostle (1 Cor. 7:
73 Suppl, 64| we are to understand the statement of the Master (Sent. iv,
74 Suppl, 66| Innocent ~III disposes of the statement of the Master (Sent. iv,
75 Suppl, 66| according to the Master's statement (Sent. iv,). Therefore ~
76 Suppl, 67| we are to ~understand the statement of Chrysostom [*Hom. xii
77 Suppl, 69| this appears from Gregory's statement (Dial. iv) that souls ~after
78 Suppl, 70| separated soul. But this statement ~seems unreasonable: because
79 Suppl, 70| the separated soul. This ~statement would seem to have originated
80 Suppl, 72| come ~down, but also the statement of the saints that it will
81 Suppl, 72| way, as appears from the statement (Rm. 8:21) that "the ~creature . . .
82 Suppl, 74| Christ's, we must ~take this statement as made in anticipation,
83 Suppl, 77| humors, as appears from ~the statement of Augustine (De Spir. et
84 Suppl, 85| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The statement, "It is the last hour" and
85 Suppl, 88| manifestly to be false from the ~statement of Gn. 1:16 that the moon
86 Suppl, 89| things. Hence he makes ~this statement in order to prove that in
87 Suppl, 89| for all eternity." The statement that the superiority of
88 Suppl, 90| St. Thomas retracts this statement]. For man's body may be ~
89 Suppl, 93| aureole, as evidenced ~by the statement (Ex. 25:25) that the little
90 Suppl, 93| On the contrary, is the statement of the gloss on Mt. 13:23, "
91 Suppl, 94| would seem an ~unreasonable statement. For the imagination is
92 Suppl, 94| have ~maintained. As to the statement of Augustine we shall say
93 Suppl, 96| individuals: so that the statement applies ~to men in the state
94 Suppl, 96| from punishment. But this statement is altogether ~unreasonable.
95 Appen2, 1| for ~which reason such a statement is erroneous and contrary
|