Part, Question
1 1, 13 | reality and idea; for the plurality of this individual thing
2 1, 13 | in idea corresponds the plurality of predicate and subject, ~
3 1, 13 | conceptions. Therefore the plurality of predicate and ~subject
4 1, 13 | subject represents the plurality of idea; and the intellect
5 1, 15 | Therefore in Him there is no plurality of ideas.~Aquin.: SMT FP
6 1, 15 | on the contrary ~that the plurality of ideas is eternal. If,
7 1, 15 | not from eternity, ~the plurality of ideas cannot be from
8 1, 15 | follows that there is a real plurality in God other than the plurality
9 1, 15 | plurality in God other than the plurality of ~Persons: and this is
10 1, 15 | understanding to be formed by a plurality of images. ~Hence many ideas
11 1, 28 | does ~not follow from their plurality that there are many relations
12 1, 30 | 30] Out. Para. 1/1 - THE PLURALITY OF PERSONS IN GOD (FOUR
13 1, 30 | now led to consider the plurality of the persons: about which ~
14 1, 30 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Plurality of absolute properties does
15 1, 30 | therefore is this effected by a plurality of relations. But in God
16 1, 30 | But in God there ~is no plurality but of relations (Q[28],
17 1, 30 | which has no number." But plurality implies number. Therefore
18 1, 30 | Q[28], A[3]). Hence the ~plurality of persons in God.~Aquin.:
19 1, 30 | God exclude every kind ~of plurality of absolute things, but
20 1, 30 | absolute things, but not plurality of relations. Because ~relations
21 1, 30 | persons in God. For ~the plurality of persons in God arises
22 1, 30 | persons in God arises from the plurality of the relative ~properties
23 1, 30 | negative and removing sense, as plurality ~is employed to remove unity,
24 1, 30 | unity, and unity to remove plurality; it follows ~that a vicious
25 1, 30 | companionship" - that is, plurality - "we exclude the idea of
26 1, 30 | one God, unity ~excludes plurality of gods, and does not imply
27 1, 30 | we may observe that all plurality is a ~consequence of division.
28 1, 30 | solitude is ~excluded by plurality, and the plurality of gods
29 1, 30 | excluded by plurality, and the plurality of gods by unity, it does
30 1, 31 | BELONGS TO THE UNITY OR PLURALITY IN GOD (FOUR ARTICLES)~We
31 1, 31 | belongs to the unity or plurality in God; which ~gives rise
32 1, 31 | number of persons. And so the plurality of persons in God requires
33 1, 31 | indeterminately signified ~by plurality, is signified by trinity
34 1, 31 | implied in a collective term, plurality of ~the "supposita," and
35 1, 31 | for in God there is no plurality of ~Sons. Yet, we do not
36 1, 31 | with God, nevertheless, if plurality of persons did not exist
37 1, 32 | Reply OBJ 3: Since the real plurality in God is founded only on
38 1, 36 | this would imply in Him a plurality of subjects.~Aquin.: SMT
39 1, 36 | spirating, by reason of the plurality of the "supposita" but not
40 1, 39 | used on account of the ~plurality of persons. Therefore the
41 1, 39 | wherefore the ~singularity or plurality of a substantive name depends
42 1, 39 | subject, so they have unity or plurality from their subject; and ~
43 1, 39 | therefore the singularity and plurality of adjectives depends upon
44 1, 39 | plurally, by reason ~of the plurality of "supposita." For we say
45 1, 39 | So as ~by reason of the plurality of "supposita" the Greeks
46 1, 39 | or to "substance," lest plurality be ~referred to the substance.~
47 1, 42 | numbers, thus involving a plurality." Now ~the reason of this
48 1, 42 | 1~On the contrary, Where plurality exists without order, confusion
49 1, 47 | are called exemplars, the plurality of ideas ~corresponds in
50 1, 47 | in the divine mind to the plurality of things.~Aquin.: SMT FP
51 1, 47 | No agent intends material plurality as the end forasmuch as ~
52 1, 76 | OBJ 6: Augustine denies a plurality of souls, that would involve
53 1, 76 | souls, that would involve a ~plurality of species.~Aquin.: SMT
54 1, 39 | used on account of the ~plurality of persons. Therefore the
55 1, 39 | wherefore the ~singularity or plurality of a substantive name depends
56 1, 39 | subject, so they have unity or plurality from their subject; and ~
57 1, 39 | therefore the singularity and plurality of adjectives depends upon
58 1, 39 | plurally, by reason ~of the plurality of "supposita." For we say
59 1, 39 | So as ~by reason of the plurality of "supposita" the Greeks
60 1, 39 | or to "substance," lest plurality be ~referred to the substance.~
61 1, 42 | numbers, thus involving a plurality." Now ~the reason of this
62 1, 42 | 1~On the contrary, Where plurality exists without order, confusion
63 1, 48 | are called exemplars, the plurality of ideas ~corresponds in
64 1, 48 | in the divine mind to the plurality of things.~Aquin.: SMT FP
65 1, 48 | No agent intends material plurality as the end forasmuch as ~
66 1, 75 | OBJ 6: Augustine denies a plurality of souls, that would involve
67 1, 75 | souls, that would involve a ~plurality of species.~Aquin.: SMT
68 1, 90 | these words is signified the plurality of the Divine Person, Whose
69 1, 92 | says (De Trin. iv): "The plurality of the Divine ~Persons is
70 2, 93 | certain distinction and plurality, according to their ~different
71 3, 17 | what pertains to unity and plurality ~in detail: thus we concluded (
72 3, 19 | a ~form or nature. Hence plurality of operations is not incompatible
73 3, 19 | considering the ~unity and plurality of operations in Christ.~
74 3, 20 | inasmuch as this implies a plurality of supposita, which is required
75 3, 35 | person. Because the unity or plurality of a relation is ~considered
76 3, 75 | instant, ~or even their plurality, is not taken according
77 3, 90 | matter, we find a kind of plurality, ~there we shall find a
78 Suppl, 29| to be done. Nor does the plurality of ministers ~destroy the
79 Suppl, 64| of the marriage debt; (2) plurality of wives; ~(3) bigamy; (
80 Suppl, 65| 65] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF PLURALITY OF WIVES (FIVE ARTICLES)~
81 Suppl, 65| We must now consider the plurality of wives. Under this head
82 Suppl, 65| a believer. Accordingly plurality ~of wives neither wholly
83 Suppl, 65| what has been ~said that plurality of wives is in a way against
84 Suppl, 65| all ~animals." Accordingly plurality of wives, though not contrary
85 Suppl, 65| would seem ~to show that plurality of wives is against the
86 Suppl, 65| marriage; and therefore plurality of ~wives is not against
87 Suppl, 65| all times and places." Now plurality of wives is ~forbidden by
88 Suppl, 65| Now the Old Law mentions plurality of wives without any prohibition ~
89 Suppl, 65| stated above (A[1], ad 7,8), plurality of wives is ~said to be
90 Suppl, 65| the precept forbidding a plurality of ~wives was framed, as
91 Suppl, 65| as one, nevertheless the plurality of ~wives signified the
92 Suppl, 66| non-being does not cause plurality, ~a man who has two wives
93 Suppl, 67| 1]) in reference to the plurality of wives and so forth. But
94 Suppl, 90| part of the object, and the plurality of mansions ~corresponds
|