Part, Question

 1   2, 31  |       nothing else need precede ~accusation except inscription." [*The
 2   2, 31  |          inscribere) the writ of accusation. The effect of this ~endorsement
 3   2, 31  |          he ~failed to prove the accusation, to suffer the same punishment
 4   2, 65  |      knowledge otherwise than by accusation; for instance, ~by denunciation,
 5   2, 66  |        MATTERS CONCERNING UNJUST ACCUSATION (FOUR ARTICLES)~We must
 6   2, 66  |     matters pertaining to unjust accusation. Under this ~head there
 7   2, 66  |          accuse?~(2) Whether the accusation should be made in writing?~(
 8   2, 66  |        in writing?~(3) How is an accusation vitiated?~(4) How should
 9   2, 66  |         between denunciation and accusation is that in denunciation ~
10   2, 66  |          s amendment, whereas in accusation we intend the ~punishment
11   2, 66  |          second regards properly accusation. ~Hence in the case of a
12   2, 66  |  commonwealth, a man is bound to accusation, provided he can offer ~
13   2, 66  |          it is necessary for the accusation to be made in writing?~Aquin.:
14   2, 66  |         seem unnecessary for the accusation to be made in ~writing.
15   2, 66  |      memory of the ~past. But an accusation is made in the present.
16   2, 66  |       the present. Therefore the accusation ~needs not to be made in
17   2, 66  |      Trin. x, 1). Therefore the ~accusation need not be in writing:
18   2, 66  |         canon ~declares that "no accusation in writing should be accepted."~
19   2, 66  |        denunciation, even as by ~accusation. Now writing is unnecessary
20   2, 66  |         seemingly unnecessary in accusation.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[68] A[
21   2, 66  |          sanctioned without ~the accusation be in writing."~Aquin.:
22   2, 66  |     criminal case goes by way of accusation, the accuser is in the position ~
23   2, 66  |        been established that the accusation, as well as other ~parts
24   2, 66  |      judgment requires that ~the accusation be drawn up in writing.~
25   2, 66  |          the canon says, "Let no accusation be accepted in writing" ~
26   2, 66  |      refers to the sending of an accusation by one who is absent: but
27   2, 66  |       Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether an accusation is rendered unjust by calumny,
28   2, 66  |         1: It would seem that an accusation is not rendered unjust by ~
29   2, 66  |       Therefore it seems that an accusation is not always rendered unjust ~
30   2, 66  |       Therefore it seems that an accusation is not ~rendered unjust
31   2, 66  |   withdrawing altogether from an accusation." But this can be ~done
32   2, 66  |         of ~having made a wicked accusation and inscription* in a matter
33   2, 66  |          inscribere) the writ of accusation. The effect ~of this endorsement
34   2, 66  |           he failed to prove the accusation, to suffer the same punishment
35   2, 66  |      evasion does ~not render an accusation unjust.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[
36   2, 66  |          As stated above (A[1]), accusation is ordered for the ~common
37   2, 66  |         two ways when making an ~accusation: first through acting unjustly
38   2, 66  |          intended ~chiefly in an accusation, when anyone with wicked
39   2, 66  |           to fraud in making the accusation. This belongs to collusion ~[
40   2, 66  |  withdrawing altogether from the accusation. This is evasion ~[tergiversatio]
41   2, 66  |          a man is led to make an accusation on account ~of an error
42   2, 66  |       blamed has uttered a false accusation.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[68] A[
43   2, 66  |        about which he ~makes the accusation, by collusion with the defendant,
44   2, 66  | withdrawing altogether from the ~accusation, by renouncing the intention
45   2, 66  |          in the very ~process of accusation, if it come to his knowledge
46   2, 66  |          that the matter of his ~accusation is false, and then by mutual
47   2, 66  |           in another way, if the accusation be ~quashed by the sovereign
48   2, 66  |       intended to procure by the accusation.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[68] A[
49   2, 66  |          a just error to make an accusation, in which case the judge
50   2, 66  |          has failed to prove his accusation.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[68] A[
51   2, 66  |        he who fails to prove his accusation, ~incurs the punishment
52   2, 66  |         that fails to prove ~his accusation, must himself suffer the
53   2, 66  |         the punishment which his accusation ~inferred."~Aquin.: SMT
54   2, 66  |          procedure is ~by way of accusation, the accuser holds the position
55   2, 66  |      that a man has made a false accusation, not with a mind to ~do
56   2, 66  |     himself, particularly if the accusation were made not ~calumniously
57   2, 67  |         if he fail to ~prove his accusation. Hence it is written (Ps.
58   2, 106 |       hath been afraid . . . the accusation of a city, and the gathering ~
59   3, 36  |       meanwhile on account of an accusation brought against ~him, or
60   3, 40  |        the Jews threw this false accusation in ~His face, saying (Jn.
61 Suppl, 8 |      confession is a sacramental accusation, as appears from the ~definition
62 Suppl, 9 |      Wherefore it ~should be an "accusation" on the part of the penitent,
63 Suppl, 55|      should ~always be by way of accusation?~(11) Whether witnesses
64 Suppl, 55|   necessary to proceed by way of accusation for the annulment ~of a
65 Suppl, 55|         not to proceed by way of accusation ~in order to sever a marriage
66 Suppl, 55|        or consanguinity. Because accusation is preceded by inscription* ~
67 Suppl, 55|         if ~he fail to prove his accusation. [*The accuser was bound
68 Suppl, 55|          inscribere) the writ of accusation; Cf. SS, Q[33], A[7]]. But ~
69 Suppl, 55|          is at issue. Therefore ~accusation has no place then.~Aquin.:
70 Suppl, 55|         process is not by way of accusation.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[55] A[
71 Suppl, 55|          is denounced. Therefore accusation should never take place
72 Suppl, 55|         Para. 1/1~I answer that, Accusation is instituted lest the guilty
73 Suppl, 55|      fact sometimes an object of accusation. It is in this way that
74 Suppl, 55|       punishment. ~Moreover, the accusation may be made either in words
75 Suppl, 55|         whom he cannot prove his accusation. On the other hand the relatives, ~
76 Suppl, 55|    contract. When, ~however, the accusation is based on a denial of
77 Suppl, 55|       betrothal, there can be no accusation, for what is not, cannot
78 Suppl, 55|          be allowed to voice his accusation. In this matter ~we deem
79 Suppl, 55|          other lawful cause, his accusation should ~be heard. otherwise
80 Suppl, 55|         by ill-will to make ~his accusation."~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[55] A[
81 Suppl, 60|    without sin, bring a criminal accusation of adultery upon his wife
82 Suppl, 60|         any other crime. Such an accusation however cannot be made in
83 Suppl, 62|        Para. 1/1~OBJ 5: Further, accusation should be preceded by inscription [*
84 Suppl, 62|      ought not to be summoned by accusation to receive the judgment
85 Suppl, 62|   fornication, and so proceed to accusation. Moreover, if he has ~no
86 Suppl, 62|         notoriety; secondly, by ~accusation, which should be preceded
87 Suppl, 62|         denunciation, and not by accusation, because ~then the end in
88 Suppl, 62| repentance against her husband's accusation ~of fornication. Therefore
89 Suppl, 62|    oppose ~her repentance to his accusation, because although she is
90 Suppl, 84|       and this suffices ~for the accusation or absolution necessary
91 Suppl, 85|         Now the evidence both of accusation and of defense will be mental, ~
92 Suppl, 85|      inquiry, ~or as regards the accusation of the wicked and the approval
93 Suppl, 86|       all men ~(which is like an accusation or approval), or the repayment