Part, Question
1 1, 7 | itself to an infinitude of singular things. ~Therefore every
2 1, 11 | that the reason why any ~singular thing is "this particular
3 1, 12 | hence sense knows only the singular. But there is another kind
4 1, 13 | every form existing in the singular subject, by which it is ~
5 1, 13 | by ~abstraction from the singular. Hence to be in one singular
6 1, 13 | singular. Hence to be in one singular subject or in ~many is outside
7 1, 13 | existing in many. But the singular, ~from the fact that it
8 1, 13 | from the fact that it is singular, is divided off from all
9 1, 13 | name imposed to signify any singular thing is incommunicable
10 1, 13 | and, if one may so speak, singular.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[13] A[
11 1, 14 | Para. 1/1~Whether God knows singular things?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
12 1, 14 | seems that God does not know singular things. For the divine ~
13 1, 14 | immateriality does not know singular things; ~but as the Philosopher
14 1, 14 | universals, sense with singular things." Therefore God does
15 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know singular things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
16 1, 14 | faculties alone know the singular, which ~receive the species
17 1, 14 | Therefore God does not know singular things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
18 1, 14 | likeness. But the likeness of singular things in so far as they
19 1, 14 | things in so far as they are ~singular, does not seem to be in
20 1, 14 | Therefore God cannot know singular things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
21 1, 14 | I answer that, God knows singular things. For all perfections
22 1, 14 | Q[4], A[2]). Now to know singular things is part of our ~perfection.
23 1, 14 | perfection. Hence God must know singular things. Even the Philosopher ~
24 1, 14 | and by another we know singular and material things, ~nevertheless
25 1, 14 | be, said that God knows singular ~things by universal causes.
26 1, 14 | For nothing exists in any singular thing, ~that does not arise
27 1, 14 | however, is not ~enough; for singular things from universal causes
28 1, 14 | mode, God would not know ~singular things in their singularity.~
29 1, 14 | have said that God knows singular things by ~the application
30 1, 14 | presupposes the knowledge of singular ~things.~Aquin.: SMT FP
31 1, 14 | knowledge of God ~must extend to singular things, which are individualized
32 1, 14 | universal, but also in the singular. The same would apply to
33 1, 14 | intellect does not know the singular. But the ~intelligible species
34 1, 14 | only universal, but also singular things.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
35 1, 29 | rational nature." For nothing singular can be subject to ~definition.
36 1, 29 | person" signifies something singular. Therefore person ~is improperly
37 1, 29 | person, as signifying the singular in the genus of substance;
38 1, 29 | added, as signifying the singular in rational ~substances.~
39 1, 29 | 1: Although this or that singular may not be definable, yet ~
40 1, 29 | person," which means ~the singular in a determined "genus,"
41 1, 29 | subsisted ~separately from singular things. To substand, however,
42 1, 29 | etc. Used, however, in the singular, it may be either absolute ~
43 1, 30 | determinate mode of existence of singular things - that is, something ~
44 1, 30 | the name of a designated ~singular thing signifies that which
45 1, 30 | the mode of existence of ~singular things; while this name "
46 1, 36 | word "principle" in the singular number does not signify ~"
47 1, 37 | which is predicated in the singular of ~each person and of all
48 1, 39 | in the ~plural, or in the singular? ~(4) Whether notional adjectives,
49 1, 39 | should be predicated in the singular of the three ~persons?~Aquin.:
50 1, 39 | not ~be predicated in the singular of the three persons, but
51 1, 39 | the three ~persons in the singular only, and not in the plural.
52 1, 39 | predicated of ~many in the singular, but otherwise if they adjectives.
53 1, 39 | the three ~persons in the singular, and not in the plural.
54 1, 39 | it is predicated in ~the singular. So Augustine says, in the
55 1, 39 | of the three, not in the singular, but in the plural.~Aquin.:
56 1, 39 | as the ~logicians say, "a singular term signifies what it stands
57 1, 39 | name "God" seems to be a singular term, for it cannot be predicated
58 1, 39 | this name "God" agrees with singular terms as ~regards the form
59 1, 39 | there is no universal and singular. Hence, ~as this proposition, "
60 1, 44 | species not existing in singular things, and ~these are called
61 1, 57 | exist between an angel and a singular object, in so far as it
62 1, 57 | object, in so far as it is ~singular; because, as was observed
63 1, 57 | singulars, it is either by ~singular or by universal species.
64 1, 57 | universal species. It is not by singular species; because ~in this
65 1, 57 | principle for knowing the singular as such, because singular
66 1, 57 | singular as such, because singular things are ~not known in
67 1, 57 | implications; because, to know a singular, merely in ~its universal
68 1, 57 | causes, is not to know it as singular, that is, as it ~exists
69 1, 57 | his intellect, and things singular and corporeal ~by the senses,
70 1, 57 | in which an angel knows singular things can be considered ~
71 1, 63 | inasmuch as he ~coveted a singular excellence, which would
72 1, 63 | which would cease to be singular because ~of the excellence
73 1, 68 | that are ~wanting in the singular. On the other hand, Basil (
74 1, 37 | which is predicated in the singular of ~each person and of all
75 1, 39 | in the ~plural, or in the singular? ~(4) Whether notional adjectives,
76 1, 39 | should be predicated in the singular of the three ~persons?~Aquin.:
77 1, 39 | not ~be predicated in the singular of the three persons, but
78 1, 39 | the three ~persons in the singular only, and not in the plural.
79 1, 39 | predicated of ~many in the singular, but otherwise if they adjectives.
80 1, 39 | the three ~persons in the singular, and not in the plural.
81 1, 39 | it is predicated in ~the singular. So Augustine says, in the
82 1, 39 | of the three, not in the singular, but in the plural.~Aquin.:
83 1, 39 | as the ~logicians say, "a singular term signifies what it stands
84 1, 39 | name "God" seems to be a singular term, for it cannot be predicated
85 1, 39 | this name "God" agrees with singular terms as ~regards the form
86 1, 39 | there is no universal and singular. Hence, ~as this proposition, "
87 1, 45 | species not existing in singular things, and ~these are called
88 1, 58 | exist between an angel and a singular object, in so far as it
89 1, 58 | object, in so far as it is ~singular; because, as was observed
90 1, 58 | singulars, it is either by ~singular or by universal species.
91 1, 58 | universal species. It is not by singular species; because ~in this
92 1, 58 | principle for knowing the singular as such, because singular
93 1, 58 | singular as such, because singular things are ~not known in
94 1, 58 | implications; because, to know a singular, merely in ~its universal
95 1, 58 | causes, is not to know it as singular, that is, as it ~exists
96 1, 58 | his intellect, and things singular and corporeal ~by the senses,
97 1, 58 | in which an angel knows singular things can be considered ~
98 1, 64 | inasmuch as he ~coveted a singular excellence, which would
99 1, 64 | which would cease to be singular because ~of the excellence
100 1, 69 | that are ~wanting in the singular. On the other hand, Basil (
101 1, 83 | which each one of these singular and sensible things is ~
102 1, 84 | from the universal to the singular and ~individual" (Phys.
103 1, 84 | and, because sense has singular and individual things for
104 1, 84 | conclude that knowledge of the singular and individual ~is prior,
105 1, 84 | itself as existing in the singular, thus in a way it is ~in
106 1, 84 | the singulars: for the ~singular is the result of matter,
107 1, 85 | our intellect knows this ~singular, Socrates.~Aquin.: SMT FP
108 1, 85 | action ~has relation to singular things. Therefore the intellect
109 1, 85 | the intellect knows the ~singular.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[
110 1, 85 | But in itself it is a ~singular, otherwise it would have
111 1, 85 | power. But sense knows the singular. Much more, therefore, can
112 1, 85 | known by reason; and the singular is known by sense."~Aquin.:
113 1, 85 | intellect cannot know the singular in material things ~directly
114 1, 85 | reflection, it can know the singular, because, as we have said
115 1, 85 | species, ~and indirectly the singular represented by the phantasm.
116 1, 85 | said ~Ethic. vii, 3. But a singular proposition cannot be directly
117 1, 85 | through the medium of a singular ~proposition. Therefore
118 1, 85 | is incompatible with the singular not as ~such, but as material,
119 1, 85 | if there be an immaterial singular such as the ~intellect,
120 1, 85 | concretely, which is to know the singular directly, the intellect
121 1, 85 | object of ~sense is the singular, which in a certain way
122 1, 85 | considered as subject to time are singular, and the human intellect
123 1, 88 | Further, the knowledge of the singular is more determinate than ~
124 1, 88 | all things, universal and singular, by His Essence, as the
125 1, 88 | intellect does not know the singular by way of ~abstraction;
126 1, 88 | separated soul knows the singular ~by abstraction from the
127 2, 2 | of the body, knows ~the singular, which is determinate through
128 2, 6 | are concerned with things singular, ~consequently all practical
129 2, 6 | with singulars; ~and the singular, as such, is here and now;
130 2, 7 | particular conditions of any singular thing are ~called its individuating
131 2, 14 | because actions bear on things singular and contingent. ~Consequently,
132 2, 29 | is ~directed to something singular, whereas hatred is also
133 2, 29 | always directed to ~something singular, whereas hatred can be directed
134 2, 68 | the ~faithful; but, in a singular way, He dwells always in
135 2, 70 | mentioned there in the ~singular, on account of its being
136 2, 76 | practical syllogism is a ~singular proposition. But a singular
137 2, 76 | singular proposition. But a singular proposition does not follow
138 2, 82 | for the ~employment of the singular is that the "sin of the
139 2, 82 | use of the plural ~for the singular, e.g. "They are dead that
140 2, 83 | lest this ~soul contract a singular corruption: all the more
141 2, 91 | practical matters, ~which are singular and contingent: but not
142 2, 97 | acquire perfect knowledge in singular matters, except by ~experience,
143 2, 24 | likewise to God we give the singular honor of latria on account
144 2, 24 | latria on account of His ~singular virtue.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[
145 2, 45 | applied. Now actions are in singular ~matters: and so it is necessary
146 2, 45 | of universals, and of the singular matters of action to which
147 2, 47 | Further, prudence is about singular matters of action (Ethic.
148 2, 47 | universal principle. Now a ~singular conclusion is argued from
149 2, 47 | argued from a universal and a singular ~proposition. Wherefore
150 2, 47 | extreme, i.e. of some primary singular and contingent ~practical
151 2, 47 | premiss, which must needs be singular in ~the syllogism of prudence,
152 2, 47 | 3],6). Now this ~primary singular is some singular end, as
153 2, 47 | primary singular is some singular end, as stated in the same
154 2, 47 | of ~art, though they are singular, are nevertheless more fixed
155 2, 47 | Q[47], A[3]) is about ~singular matters of action, which
156 2, 50 | reason is unable to grasp the singular and ~contingent things which
157 2, 58 | human acts, which are about singular and contingent ~matters,
158 2, 79 | to God in a special and singular ~way, because He made all
159 2, 79 | excellence: and to God a singular ~excellence is competent,
160 2, 92 | God Who excels all in a singular manner: and this is the ~
161 2, 95 | divine excellence that it is ~singular and incommunicable. Consequently
162 2, 120 | Hence it is expressed in the singular: "Thou shalt ~not take the
163 2, 121 | but also such as occur in singular combat, which may be ~called
164 2, 169 | the contingency of future singular ~events, because that knowledge
165 2, 186 | account of the indivisible and singular life which unites ~them
166 3, 2 | OBJ 3: In created things a singular thing is placed in a genus
167 3, 2 | find ~merits preceding the singular generation of our Head,
168 3, 3 | qualities is designated in the singular as "such by ~reason of the
169 3, 3 | Persons ~were to assume one singular human nature, they would
170 3, 4 | way as to be outside the singular, as the Platonists held, ~
171 3, 11 | He ~consequently knew all singular things - present, past,
172 3, 11 | be the proper species of singular things, in order ~to know
173 3, 16 | something individual and singular.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
174 3, 24 | And just as Christ in a singular ~manner above all others
175 3, 24 | natural Son of God, so in a singular ~manner is He predestinated.~
176 3, 24 | Man to Himself in such a singular and ineffable manner that
177 3, 26 | consequently ~take from Him the singular fulness of grace, which
178 3, 27 | s womb, for this was the singular privilege of ~Christ: but
179 3, 27 | her sensitive soul, in a singular manner, from any inordinate
180 3, 27 | Secondly, because of the singular affinity ~between her and
181 3, 27 | Thirdly, because of ~the singular manner in which the Son
182 3, 37 | the woman's sin": and in a singular way "is He ~called 'holy,'
183 3, 46 | putting the plural for the singular" when he said ~"the thieves
184 3, 47 | from the excellence of His ~singular grace.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
185 3, 66 | should not be limited to the singular number in the words, "I
186 3, 67 | plural is ~nothing but the singular doubled: especially as we
187 3, 73 | us"; and afterwards the singular ~number: "May this sacrament
188 Suppl, 20| That which has to do with singular matters is not equally ~
189 Suppl, 40| reason He said to ~him in the singular: "Confirm thy brethren" (
|