Part, Question
1 1, 13 | name of ~God?~(12) Whether affirmative propositions can be formed
2 1, 13 | as regards absolute and affirmative names of God, as "good," "
3 1, 13 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether affirmative propositions can be formed
4 1, 13 | 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that affirmative propositions cannot be formed
5 1, 13 | everything about which an ~affirmative proposition is made is taken
6 1, 13 | a subject. Therefore an ~affirmative proposition cannot be formed
7 1, 13 | Therefore since every affirmative intellect ~understands something
8 1, 13 | it follows that a true affirmative ~proposition about God cannot
9 1, 13 | cannot be false. But some affirmative ~propositions are of faith;
10 1, 13 | omnipotent. Therefore true affirmative propositions can be formed
11 1, 13 | 1/2~I answer that, True affirmative propositions can be formed
12 1, 13 | know that in every true affirmative proposition the ~predicate
13 1, 16 | understand this unless the affirmative ~must be resolved into the
14 1, 19 | opposed; since either ~is affirmative. God therefore neither wills
15 1, 39 | then, on the contrary, the affirmative proposition ~is true, and
16 1, 39 | better to say simply that the affirmative ~proposition is false, and
17 1, 39 | that both the negative and affirmative are false, because this
18 1, 39 | this relative ~"Who" in the affirmative proposition can be referred
19 1, 39 | suppositum." Whence, in the affirmative the sense is that "to be
20 1, 58 | speaking to ~men, angels use affirmative and negative expressions,
21 1, 58 | The fact that angels use affirmative and negative forms of ~speech,
22 1, 39 | then, on the contrary, the affirmative proposition ~is true, and
23 1, 39 | better to say simply that the affirmative ~proposition is false, and
24 1, 39 | that both the negative and affirmative are false, because this
25 1, 39 | this relative ~"Who" in the affirmative proposition can be referred
26 1, 39 | suppositum." Whence, in the affirmative the sense is that "to be
27 1, 59 | speaking to ~men, angels use affirmative and negative expressions,
28 1, 59 | The fact that angels use affirmative and negative forms of ~speech,
29 1, 84 | division, as appears in affirmative and negative propositions.
30 2, 71 | omission is contrary to an affirmative precept ~which binds always,
31 2, 71 | for the time at which the affirmative precept binds him to act.~
32 2, 72 | Now in God's law, the affirmative precepts, against which
33 2, 72 | the necessity for various affirmative and ~negative precepts,
34 2, 72 | which we are induced by the affirmative ~precepts. Wherefore the
35 2, 72 | precepts. Wherefore the affirmative and negative precepts do
36 2, 76 | at the time at which the affirmative precept is binding, so is
37 2, 77 | opinion about a universal affirmative proposition, and at the
38 2, 77 | knowledge ~about a universal affirmative proposition, and actually
39 2, 88 | precept of the Apostle is affirmative, and so it does ~not bind
40 2, 89 | when man is bound by God's affirmative precept, which the Lord
41 2, 100 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the affirmative precepts in the Law are
42 2, 100 | am the Lord thy God," is affirmative: and ~that which follows, "
43 2, 100 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The affirmative precepts are distinct from
44 2, 100 | the former. But when an affirmative precept is ~included in
45 2, 100 | virtue are prescribed by the affirmative ~precepts, and acts of vice
46 2, 100 | should ~have preceded the affirmative.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[100] A[
47 2, 100 | argument holds in respect of affirmative and ~negative precepts about
48 2, 100 | belongs to the first table, an affirmative precept is placed ~last,
49 2, 100 | formulated. Because the affirmative precepts direct man to acts
50 2, 100 | there should have been an affirmative and a negative precept. ~
51 2, 100 | Therefore it was unfitting that affirmative precepts should be framed
52 2, 100 | that there are only two affirmative precepts; one ~about the
53 2, 100 | its kind: because it is an affirmative ~precept that binds one
54 2, 100 | And ~since these are two affirmative precepts, not binding for
55 2, 3 | confession of faith is something ~affirmative, it can only fall under
56 2, 3 | it can only fall under an affirmative precept. Hence its ~necessity
57 2, 3 | on how it falls under an affirmative ~precept of the Divine law.
58 2, 3 | precept of the Divine law. Now affirmative precepts as stated above (
59 2, 15 | precepts ~about teaching - both affirmative precepts as, for example, (
60 2, 21 | enough that he receive an affirmative precept as to what he has
61 2, 60 | lawfully delay to restore. For affirmative precepts do not bind ~for
62 2, 60 | restitution is binding through an ~affirmative precept. Therefore a man
63 2, 60 | making of restitution is ~affirmative in form, it implies a negative
64 2, 69 | performing works of mercy, being ~affirmative, is binding according to
65 2, 77 | omission which is opposed to an affirmative precept.~Aquin.: SMT SS
66 2, 77 | omission is ~opposed to affirmative precepts, which regard the
67 2, 77 | the doing of good. Now ~affirmative precepts bind not for always,
68 2, 77 | they are opposed to ~an affirmative precept. Therefore omission
69 2, 77 | as omission is opposed to affirmative precepts, so is ~transgression
70 2, 77 | for any infringement of an affirmative or ~negative precept, disposing
71 2, 120 | point of fact there is one affirmative precept about ~religion,
72 2, 120 | did not behoove to include affirmative ~precepts about those duties
73 2, 138 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, affirmative precepts are of greater
74 2, 138 | negative ~precepts, since the affirmative include the negative, but
75 2, 138 | are negative rather than affirmative.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[140] A[
76 2, 138 | precepts of fortitude are not affirmative but only negative, as stated
77 2, 138 | have ~been negative and not affirmative.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[140] A[
78 2, 138 | above (Q[3], A[2]), although affirmative precepts ~are always binding,
79 2, 138 | time. Wherefore just as the affirmative precepts about the ~other
80 2, 168 | should have included an affirmative precept directly ~prescribing
81 2, 168 | possible to give any common ~affirmative precepts of temperance,
82 3, 16 | God is man." For every ~affirmative proposition of remote matter
83 3, 16 | aforesaid proposition is affirmative, it would seem to be false.~
84 Suppl, 6 | seems too ~severe, because affirmative precepts bind, not at once,
85 Suppl, 6 | account of the nature of an ~affirmative precept, so that before
86 Suppl, 6 | with the fulfillment of an affirmative precept, which ~binds always,
87 Suppl, 64| does not ask for it. For an affirmative precept is ~binding only
88 Suppl, 64| OBJ 2: Further, it is an affirmative precept that binds us to
|