Part, Question
1 1, 13 | nature of every species by ~abstraction from the singular. Hence
2 1, 14 | God, is immaterial not by abstraction, but of itself, being the
3 1, 14 | speculative knowledge comes by abstraction from things; ~which does
4 1, 40 | persons?~(3) Whether mental abstraction of the relations from the
5 1, 40 | Para. 1/4~I answer that, Abstraction by the intellect is twofold -
6 1, 40 | in the fact that in ~the abstraction of the universal from the
7 1, 40 | particular, that from which ~the abstraction is made does not remain;
8 1, 40 | alone remains. But in the abstraction of the form ~from the matter,
9 1, 40 | So, if we speak of the abstraction of the ~universal from the
10 1, 40 | 2/4~But as regards the abstraction of the form from the matter,
11 1, 42 | subsistence. The sixth is the abstraction of a species from matter,
12 1, 54 | potentiality, ~in so far as by abstraction it makes them to be actually
13 1, 55 | which is in the intellect by abstraction from matter and from ~material
14 1, 57 | intelligible by a process of abstraction. But he does not derive ~
15 1, 57 | it makes intelligible by abstraction.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
16 1, 57 | apprehends only by a process of abstraction; and by such abstraction
17 1, 57 | abstraction; and by such abstraction from ~material conditions
18 1, 40 | persons?~(3) Whether mental abstraction of the relations from the
19 1, 40 | Para. 1/4~I answer that, Abstraction by the intellect is twofold -
20 1, 40 | in the fact that in ~the abstraction of the universal from the
21 1, 40 | particular, that from which ~the abstraction is made does not remain;
22 1, 40 | alone remains. But in the abstraction of the form ~from the matter,
23 1, 40 | So, if we speak of the abstraction of the ~universal from the
24 1, 40 | 2/4~But as regards the abstraction of the form from the matter,
25 1, 42 | subsistence. The sixth is the abstraction of a species from matter,
26 1, 55 | potentiality, ~in so far as by abstraction it makes them to be actually
27 1, 56 | which is in the intellect by abstraction from matter and from ~material
28 1, 58 | intelligible by a process of abstraction. But he does not derive ~
29 1, 58 | it makes intelligible by abstraction.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
30 1, 58 | apprehends only by a process of abstraction; and by such abstraction
31 1, 58 | abstraction; and by such abstraction from ~material conditions
32 1, 78 | actually intelligible, by ~abstraction of the species from material
33 1, 78 | actually intelligible by way of abstraction.~~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[79] A[
34 1, 78 | actually ~immaterial, by abstraction from the conditions of individual
35 1, 83 | intelligible, by a process of abstraction.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[84] A[
36 1, 84 | and material things by ~abstraction from phantasms?~Aquin.:
37 1, 84 | and material things by abstraction from the phantasms. For
38 1, 84 | understand material things by abstraction of the species from the ~
39 1, 84 | cannot be understood by ~abstraction of the universal from the
40 1, 84 | seeing is not ~caused by abstraction of species from color, but
41 1, 84 | understanding take ~place by abstraction of something from the phantasm,
42 1, 84 | way do we understand by abstraction from phantasms.~Aquin.:
43 1, 84 | and not, therefore, ~by abstraction.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[85] A[
44 1, 84 | that we understand not by ~abstraction, but by participating things
45 1, 84 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Abstraction may occur in two ways: First,
46 1, 84 | does, ~in the first mode of abstraction, imply falsehood. But, in
47 1, 84 | in the second ~mode of abstraction, for the intellect to abstract
48 1, 84 | consider the twofold kind of abstraction, as ~above explained (ad
49 1, 84 | are made more fit for the abstraction therefrom of intelligible ~
50 1, 84 | nature of a thing and its abstraction or universality. ~Therefore
51 1, 84 | is due to intellectual abstraction, the ~universal thus considered
52 1, 84 | understanding ~by way of abstraction. But what is a principle
53 1, 85 | universal comes from the abstraction of the form from the particular ~
54 1, 87 | understand by a process of abstraction, which is impossible in
55 1, 87 | again be made subject to abstraction; and as the process of ~
56 1, 87 | and as the process of ~abstraction cannot go on forever, it
57 1, 88 | which are necessary for the abstraction of species: nor does it ~
58 1, 88 | things, one by means of abstraction ~from phantasms, and in
59 1, 88 | the singular by way of ~abstraction; neither does the separated
60 1, 88 | soul knows the singular ~by abstraction from the sensible. If that
61 1, 88 | however, impossible ~because abstraction of the species from the
62 1, 106 | operation takes place by abstraction from the "here and now,"
63 2, 29 | universal is obtained by abstraction from individual matter,
64 2, 29 | universality is given ~by abstraction.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[29] A[
65 2, 14 | operation in man consists in an ~abstraction from sensible phantasms,
66 2, 51 | intellectual virtue consists in abstraction from ~sensible objects.
67 2, 171 | is always accompanied by abstraction ~from the sense?~(4) Whether
68 2, 171 | is always accompanied by abstraction from ~the senses?~Aquin.:
69 2, 171 | is always accompanied by ~abstraction from the senses. For it
70 2, 171 | said nor done, there is abstraction from the ~senses. Therefore
71 2, 171 | is always accompanied by abstraction from the ~senses. ~Aquin.:
72 2, 171 | is always accompanied ~by abstraction from the senses.~Aquin.:
73 2, 171 | be always accompanied by abstraction from the ~senses.~Aquin.:
74 2, 171 | vision is not ~accompanied by abstraction from the senses.~Aquin.:
75 2, 171 | evident that there is ~no abstraction from the senses, when something
76 2, 171 | 3] Body Para. 2/4~Again, abstraction from the external senses
77 2, 171 | images in the ~imagination, abstraction from the senses is necessary
78 2, 171 | external sensation. Yet ~this abstraction from the senses is sometimes
79 2, 171 | Body Para. 4/4~Yet this abstraction from the senses takes place
80 2, 171 | its application ~leads to abstraction from the senses; but when
81 2, 171 | sense, there ~is no need for abstraction from the senses.~Aquin.:
82 2, 171 | above. Hence there is no ~abstraction from the senses when the
83 2, 173 | happens to those who suffer ~abstraction from the senses through
84 2, 173 | operation that ~requires abstraction of the intellect from phantasms,
85 3, 12 | could increase by this ~abstraction of species; inasmuch as
86 Suppl, 70| with greater or ~lesser abstraction from matter and material
87 Suppl, 89| intellect attains to the supreme abstraction of any ~intelligible quiddity,
88 Suppl, 89| results from some kind of abstraction from ~matter. Wherefore
|