Part, Question
1 1, 2 | the first principles of demonstration. Thus, when the ~nature
2 1, 2 | the first principles of demonstration. But the opposite of the ~
3 1, 2 | the first ~principles of demonstration, the terms of which are
4 1, 2 | demonstrated, because a demonstration produces scientific knowledge; ~
5 1, 2 | essence is the middle term of demonstration. But we ~cannot know in
6 1, 2 | Para. 1/1~I answer that, Demonstration can be made in two ways:
7 1, 2 | effect, and is called a ~demonstration "a posteriori"; this is
8 1, 3 | save through His effects, a demonstration of Him: for a ~definition
9 1, 3 | difference; and the mean of a demonstration ~is a definition. That God
10 1, 10 | instance, all principles of demonstration and ~all demonstrative propositions.
11 1, 12 | is capable of scientific demonstration is ~held only by an opinion
12 1, 12 | anyone knows by scientific ~demonstration that a triangle has three
13 1, 13 | pronouns the same with ~demonstration or relation. But none of
14 1, 14 | comprehended ~when known by demonstration, not, however, when it is
15 1, 39 | persons cannot be proved by demonstration, as was above ~expounded (
16 1, 42 | intellect, as the principle of demonstration; and ~according to each
17 1, 44 | cause. But in mathematics demonstration is not made by the efficient ~
18 1, 46 | it cannot be ~proved by demonstration.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[46] A[
19 1, 46 | alone do we hold, and by no demonstration can it ~be proved, that
20 1, 46 | itself. For the principle of demonstration is the essence of a thing.
21 1, 46 | object of ~faith, but not of demonstration or science. And it is useful
22 1, 47 | speculative things the medium of demonstration, which ~demonstrates the
23 1, 53 | all, because Aristotle's demonstration deals with what is ~indivisible
24 1, 53 | Secondly, because Aristotle's demonstration deals with movement which
25 1, 53 | continuous, Aristotle's demonstration does not hold good. But
26 1, 58 | as when, by ~division and demonstration, we seek out the truth of
27 1, 76 | of the body. This is the demonstration ~used by Aristotle (De Anima
28 1, 39 | persons cannot be proved by demonstration, as was above ~expounded (
29 1, 42 | intellect, as the principle of demonstration; and ~according to each
30 1, 45 | cause. But in mathematics demonstration is not made by the efficient ~
31 1, 47 | it cannot be ~proved by demonstration.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[46] A[
32 1, 47 | alone do we hold, and by no demonstration can it ~be proved, that
33 1, 47 | itself. For the principle of demonstration is the essence of a thing.
34 1, 47 | object of ~faith, but not of demonstration or science. And it is useful
35 1, 48 | speculative things the medium of demonstration, which ~demonstrates the
36 1, 54 | all, because Aristotle's demonstration deals with what is ~indivisible
37 1, 54 | Secondly, because Aristotle's demonstration deals with movement which
38 1, 54 | continuous, Aristotle's demonstration does not hold good. But
39 1, 59 | as when, by ~division and demonstration, we seek out the truth of
40 1, 75 | of the body. This is the demonstration ~used by Aristotle (De Anima
41 1, 81 | necessity until through the ~demonstration it recognizes the necessity
42 1, 83 | science), and likewise all demonstration through moving and ~material
43 1, 93 | such as the medium in a demonstration. God was seen without this
44 1, 93 | the knowledge of God by demonstration drawn ~from an effect, such
45 1, 116 | says (Poster. i, 2) that "a demonstration is a ~syllogism that causes
46 2, 13 | hinders the principle of ~one demonstration or of one science, from
47 2, 13 | the conclusion of ~another demonstration or science; while the first
48 2, 13 | be the conclusion of any demonstration or science; so ~too that
49 2, 14 | is the ~principle of one demonstration, is the conclusion of another:
50 2, 51 | caused by one act. For ~demonstration is an act of reason. But
51 2, 51 | conclusion, is caused by one demonstration. Therefore habit can be
52 2, 54 | Now the whole force of a ~demonstration, which is "a syllogism producing
53 2, 54 | science, he who acquires, by demonstration, ~scientific knowledge of
54 2, 54 | And when he obtains, by demonstration, the scientific ~knowledge
55 2, 57 | Now the principle of a demonstration is the ~formal aspect under
56 2, 57 | hand, the principles of a demonstration can be ~considered apart,
57 2, 94 | principles to matters of ~demonstration. But there are several first
58 2, 1 | science is ~the mean of demonstration, through which the conclusions
59 2, 1 | save through ~the mean of demonstration. Now it has been stated (
60 2, 1 | conclusion through its ~demonstration]?~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[1] A[
61 2, 1 | object of science, ~since a "demonstration is a syllogism that produces
62 2, 1 | he does not ~know it by demonstration.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[1] A[5]
63 2, 1 | hand, know them, not as by ~demonstration, but by the light of faith
64 2, 1 | Things which can be proved by demonstration are reckoned ~among the
65 2, 1 | who do not known them by demonstration must know them first of ~
66 2, 1 | manner, one may know by ~demonstration the unity of the Godhead,
67 2, 1 | things, which can be known by demonstration, do not ~belong to faith
68 2, 1 | Now it can be known by demonstration that there is one God; hence
69 2, 2 | demonstrated conclusion through its demonstration.], or understands. ~If,
70 2, 2 | demonstrated conclusion through its demonstration] would ~seem to come under
71 2, 2 | conclusion through its ~demonstration.]. Now the considerations
72 2, 2 | to assent by force of the demonstration, wherefore ~scientific assent
73 2, 2 | although he may have reasons in demonstration of some of them, ~e.g. of
74 2, 5 | their respective ~means of demonstration, one of which may be known
75 2, 9 | Poster. i, 2) that a ~"demonstration is a syllogism which produces
76 2, 46 | attaining ~of science by demonstration, which belongs to "physics" (
77 2, 47 | reasoning of prudence is not a ~demonstration since it deals with contingencies.
78 2, 49 | common principles; while demonstration which ~tends to judgment,
79 2, 58 | indeed ~the certainty of a demonstration, but such as is befitting
80 2, 169 | way what one man knows by ~demonstration may be revealed to another
81 2, 187 | it requires no further demonstration," as a gloss says on 1 ~
82 3, 9 | knowledge, which is acquired by demonstration, yet, when this has been ~
83 3, 60 | science is the effect of a ~demonstration. Therefore not every sign
84 3, 78 | the word "this" implies ~demonstration as conceived, and not as
85 Suppl, 72| things one does not come by a demonstration of ~reason to know non-natural
86 Suppl, 89| thus in one principle of demonstration one who is quick of ~intelligence
|