|    Part, Question1   1, 4   |             we see in non-univocal agents. For since every agent reproduces
 2   1, 8   |           the most powerful of all agents. Therefore His action ~can
 3   1, 13  |            there are some univocal agents which agree with their ~
 4   1, 13  |           man; and there are some ~agents which are equivocal, as
 5   1, 13  |           agent to which all other agents are reduced, is an univocal
 6   1, 15  |           in two ways. For in some agents the form of the thing to
 7   1, 15  |            fire. Whereas in ~other agents (the form of the thing to
 8   1, 15  |         result of a ~succession of agents, as has been supposed by
 9   1, 17  |           in the case of voluntary agents only, who have it in their
10   1, 19  |           is first in the order of agents, He must act by ~intellect
11   1, 37  |        actions that ~remain in the agents, as stated above (Q[14],
12   1, 42  |        differently as regards free agents and ~natural agents. In
13   1, 42  |           free agents and ~natural agents. In free agents, on account
14   1, 42  |            natural agents. In free agents, on account of the choice
15   1, 42  |            its effect. ~In natural agents, however, the same happens
16   1, 44  |          time: these are imperfect agents, and to these it ~belongs
17   1, 46  |        principle of action. But in agents ~acting by will, what is
18   1, 47  | distinction of things to secondary agents, as ~did Avicenna, who said
19   1, 56  |      principle of action in other ~agents: for, as heat is the formal
20   1, 76  |   instrument and several principal agents, we might say that there
21   1, 76  |         say that there are several agents, but one act; for example,
22   1, 37  |        actions that ~remain in the agents, as stated above (Q[14],
23   1, 42  |        differently as regards free agents and ~natural agents. In
24   1, 42  |           free agents and ~natural agents. In free agents, on account
25   1, 42  |            natural agents. In free agents, on account of the choice
26   1, 42  |            its effect. ~In natural agents, however, the same happens
27   1, 45  |          time: these are imperfect agents, and to these it ~belongs
28   1, 47  |        principle of action. But in agents ~acting by will, what is
29   1, 48  | distinction of things to secondary agents, as ~did Avicenna, who said
30   1, 57  |      principle of action in other ~agents: for, as heat is the formal
31   1, 75  |   instrument and several principal agents, we might say that there
32   1, 75  |         say that there are several agents, but one act; for example,
33   1, 78  |           are not in the nature of agents in regard to the passivity ~
34   1, 103 |         may be seen clearly in all agents which do not produce an
35   1, 103 |           the action of corrupting agents, and for that ~reason are
36   1, 104 |           where there ~are several agents in order, the second always
37   1, 104 |        second to act. And thus all agents ~act in virtue of God Himself:
38   1, 104 |          but He also gives created agents their forms and ~preserves
39   1, 104 |         the operation of secondary agents is ~superfluous.~Aquin.:
40   1, 104 |          does not proceed from two agents of the same ~order. But
41   1, 105 |       others. Hence also corporeal agents give ~their likeness to
42   1, 109 |           only ~over the universal agents, the heavenly bodies. Avicenna
43   1, 109 |          power of their principal ~agents, and which cannot be due
44   1, 109 |     intellect"; and that corporeal agents only dispose [matter] for ~
45   1, 109 |             way than can corporeal agents, that is by moving the corporeal
46   1, 109 |            by moving the corporeal agents ~themselves, as being the
47   1, 109 |       which the power of corporeal agents would not ~suffice. This,
48   1, 109 |             by employing corporeal agents ~to produce these effects,
49   1, 109 |     outside the order of corporeal agents; which is to work ~miracles.~
50   1, 114 |        extent, held that corporeal agents act through ~their accidental
51   1, 114 |            and there are ~contrary agents - heat and cold, and the
52   1, 114 |   impressions produced by heavenly agents. ~Wherefore it seems that
53   1, 116 |         way they held that natural agents only ~dispose (matter) to
54   1, 116 |            by employing corporeal ~agents for the production of certain
55   1, 116 |       rather than natural contrary agents. Therefore when the soul
56   1, 117 |    existence by certain ~corporeal agents that reduce the matter from
57   1, 117 |       holds in the case of diverse agents not ~ordered to one another.
58   1, 117 |           But where there are many agents ordered to one ~another,
59   1, 117 |         the powers of the inferior agents extend only to ~some disposition
60   1, 118 |   continuous ~action, because such agents are also patient. Therefore
61   2, 1   |           the end; thus in natural agents the form of the ~thing generated
62   2, 22  |        suffer much even from petty agents. Therefore ~although the
63   2, 23  |           as if they were ~natural agents. For every mover, in a fashion,
64   2, 32  |        from habits existing in the agents. ~Therefore the actions
65   2, 32  |         pleasing to us, but to the agents ~themselves.~Aquin.: SMT
66   2, 36  |            1~Reply OBJ 3: External agents can be the causes of appetitive
67   2, 51  |            can be caused in ~their agents; not indeed with regard
68   2, 60  |         happens with ~all univocal agents, so that if the agent be
69   2, 74  |         compared to reason as free agents, because ~they both act
70   2, 109 |          according to the order of agents or movers, man must ~be
71   2, 56  |          though they were so many ~agents: so that metaphorically
72   3, 19  |          several mutually ordained agents, the inferior is ~moved
73   3, 46  |           nature never employs two agents where one will suffice. ~
74   3, 63  |       pertains to the sacramental ~agents: for it is by this sacrament
75   3, 65  |       actions we must consider the agents, the ~recipients and the
76   3, 65  |    recipients and the actions. The agents are the ministers of the
77   3, 66  |     according to the number of the agents, if it be done ~perfectly
78   3, 67  |           argument avails in those agents that act by their own ~power.
79   3, 81  |     suffering body with the active agents. But Christ's body, ~according
80   3, 85  |            operating as ~principal agents, but not without our co-operating
81 Suppl, 17|            every ordered series of agents, the last end belongs ~to
82 Suppl, 17|        instrumental or ministerial agents.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[17] A[
83 Suppl, 55|         instanced in all equivocal agents. The first kind of ~procession,
84 Suppl, 83|            and all other secondary agents act in virtue thereof and
85 Suppl, 83|        thus it is in all univocal ~agents, for instance a thing that
86 Suppl, 83|            it ~is in all equivocal agents. In these it happens sometimes
 
 |