Part, Question
1 1, 13 | all these ideas are vain ~notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[13] A[
2 1, 29 | have appeared necessary notions concerning the ~processions
3 1, 32 | natural reason?~(2) Whether notions are to be attributed to
4 1, 32 | persons?~(3) The number of the notions?~(4) Whether we may lawfully
5 1, 32 | contrary opinions of these ~notions?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
6 1, 32 | Para. 1/1~Whether there are notions in God?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
7 1, 32 | that in God there are no notions. For Dionysius says (Div.
8 1, 32 | say ~anything concerning notions. Therefore there are none
9 1, 32 | of the persons. But the notions do not concern the unity ~
10 1, 32 | essence be predicated of the notions: for instance, we do ~not
11 1, 32 | Therefore there do not exist ~notions in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
12 1, 32 | presuppose any abstract notions as ~principles of knowing
13 1, 32 | we are not to suppose any notions in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
14 1, 32 | must ~admit properties and notions in God.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
15 1, 32 | there were no properties or notions, and wherever there ~were
16 1, 32 | these ~are the properties or notions signified by an abstract
17 1, 32 | mean by ~properties and notions. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
18 1, 32 | Reply OBJ 1: Although the notions are not mentioned in Holy
19 1, 32 | comprising the idea of notions, as the ~abstract is contained
20 1, 32 | Reply OBJ 2: In God the notions have their significance
21 1, 32 | known; although in God these notions or relations are real, as
22 1, 32 | cannot be applied to the notions; forasmuch as this is ~against
23 1, 32 | can be predicated of the notions; for we can say ~that paternity
24 1, 32 | can be predicated of the notions; for we can say that paternity
25 1, 32 | 1~Whether there are five notions?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
26 1, 32 | that there are not five notions. For the notions ~proper
27 1, 32 | not five notions. For the notions ~proper to the persons are
28 1, 32 | A[4]). ~Therefore the notions are only four in number.~
29 1, 32 | if in God there are five notions, He may be called ~quinary;
30 1, 32 | Further, if there are five notions for the three persons in
31 1, 32 | some one person two or more notions, as in the person of ~the
32 1, 32 | spiration. ~Either these three notions really differ, or not. If
33 1, 32 | Therefore there are ~not five notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
34 1, 32 | Therefore, there are Five notions in God: "innascibility," "
35 1, 32 | persons. Three ~are personal notions - i.e. constituting persons, "
36 1, 32 | innascibility" are ~called notions of Persons, but not personal
37 1, 32 | Persons, but not personal notions, as we shall explain ~further
38 1, 32 | as realities; whereas the notions are signified ~as ideas
39 1, 32 | not ~quinary by the five notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
40 1, 32 | various contrary opinions of notions?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
41 1, 32 | contrary ~opinions of the notions. For Augustine says (De
42 1, 32 | to which mystery the ~notions assuredly belong. But contrary
43 1, 32 | contrary opinions of the ~notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
44 1, 32 | persons are known by the notions. But no contrary ~opinion
45 1, 32 | can ~there be about the notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[32] A[
46 1, 32 | 1/1~On the contrary, The notions are not articles of faith.
47 1, 32 | different opinions of the notions are permissible.~Aquin.:
48 1, 32 | contrary opinions about the ~notions, if he does not mean to
49 1, 32 | entertain a false opinion of the notions, ~knowing or thinking that
50 1, 41 | called notional; because the notions of the ~persons are the
51 1, 41 | are the relations, or the notions. ~Nevertheless we cannot
52 1, 42 | nor any of the persons, or notions. Therefore there is no order ~
53 1, 42 | relation or notion, several notions are included. Therefore,
54 1, 42 | Father there are three notions, while in the Son there
55 1, 43 | to them all, ~except the notions and persons. But mission
56 1, 43 | since there are only five notions, as stated above ~(Q[32],
57 1, 43 | is common to two of the notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[
58 1, 49 | also arose other ~strange notions of the ancients; namely,
59 1, 75 | without contrariety; ~for the notions even of contraries are not
60 1, 76 | from the various logical notions or intentions, which flow ~
61 1, 76 | to certain fixed natural notions, or even to certain fixed
62 1, 41 | called notional; because the notions of the ~persons are the
63 1, 41 | are the relations, or the notions. ~Nevertheless we cannot
64 1, 42 | nor any of the persons, or notions. Therefore there is no order ~
65 1, 42 | relation or notion, several notions are included. Therefore,
66 1, 42 | Father there are three notions, while in the Son there
67 1, 43 | to them all, ~except the notions and persons. But mission
68 1, 43 | since there are only five notions, as stated above ~(Q[32],
69 1, 43 | is common to two of the notions.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[
70 1, 50 | also arose other ~strange notions of the ancients; namely,
71 1, 74 | without contrariety; ~for the notions even of contraries are not
72 1, 75 | from the various logical notions or intentions, which flow ~
73 1, 75 | to certain fixed natural notions, or even to certain fixed
74 1, 78 | OBJ 3: Those unchangeable notions are the first practical ~
75 1, 81 | differentiated by the different ~notions of particular good: for
76 1, 86 | the arts; but by certain notions." Now it does not seem ~
77 1, 86 | be in the soul any other notions of things but either the ~
78 1, 86 | in the memory by certain notions.~
79 1, 92 | conditions subsequent to general notions of ~being, such as simplicity
80 2, 5 | lower angel, as to certain notions of the Divine works: but
81 2, 60 | respect of various special notions. The ~reason for this is
82 2, 94 | which are called common notions. But in matters of action, ~
83 2, 106| However, these foolish notions ~are refuted by the statement (
84 2, 2 | either about universal notions, which belongs to the intellectual ~
85 3, 66 | Church some have had false notions ~concerning the Trinity,
|