Part, Question
1 1, 22 | says (De Consol. iv, 6): "Fate from the ~immutable source
2 1, 23 | ordination, which they called fate, could be frustrated ~by
3 1, 114| corporeal creature; and fate, ~which is ascribed to certain
4 1, 115| 116] Out. Para. 1/1 - ON FATE (FOUR ARTICLES)~We come
5 1, 115| to the consideration of fate. Under this head there are
6 1, 115| Is there such a thing as fate?~(2) Where is it?~(3) Is
7 1, 115| Are all things subject to fate?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116] A[
8 1, 115| there be such a thing as fate?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116] A[
9 1, 115| OBJ 1: It would seem that fate is nothing. For Gregory
10 1, 115| faithful to think that fate is anything real."~Aquin.:
11 1, 115| Further, what happens by fate is not unforeseen, for as
12 1, 115| says (De Civ. Dei v, 4), "fate is understood to be derived
13 1, 115| were said to happen by ~fate, which are "fore-spoken"
14 1, 115| therefore things happen ~by fate, there will be neither luck
15 1, 115| De ~Consol. iv) defines fate thus: "Fate is a disposition
16 1, 115| iv) defines fate thus: "Fate is a disposition inherent
17 1, 115| denied the existence ~of fate and Providence, as Augustine
18 1, 115| bodies. According to these fate is nothing else than "a
19 1, 115| indirectly. Now the cause of fate, since it has the ordering
20 1, 115| of things ~that happen by fate, must of necessity be directly
21 1, 115| can admit the existence of fate: although the holy doctors
22 1, 115| ascribes human affairs to fate, meaning thereby the ~will
23 1, 115| denies the existence of fate: wherefore the first ~objection'
24 1, 115| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether fate is in created things?~Aquin.:
25 1, 115| OBJ 1: It would seem that fate is not in created things.
26 1, 115| will or power is called fate." ~But the Divine will or
27 1, 115| but in God. Therefore ~fate is not in creatures but
28 1, 115| Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 2: Further, fate is compared to things that
29 1, 115| to things that happen by fate, as their ~cause; as the
30 1, 115| above (A[1]). Therefore fate is in God, and not in creatures.~
31 1, 115| 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if fate is in creatures, it is either
32 1, 115| creatures. Since, therefore, fate seems to be one thing only, ~
33 1, 115| thing only, ~it seems that fate is not in creatures, but
34 1, 115| Boethius says (De Consol. iv): "Fate is a disposition ~inherent
35 1, 115| thus ~it has the nature of fate. This is what Boethius says (
36 1, 115| says (De Consol. iv): ~"Fate is worked out when Divine
37 1, 115| or by all, the ~chain of fate is forged." Of each of these
38 1, 115| therefore ~manifest that fate is in the created causes
39 1, 115| has not the nature of fate, ~except as dependent on
40 1, 115| power or will can be ~called fate, as being the cause of fate.
41 1, 115| fate, as being the cause of fate. But essentially fate is
42 1, 115| of fate. But essentially fate is the very ~disposition
43 1, 115| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Fate has the nature of a cause,
44 1, 115| ordering of which is called fate.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116] A[
45 1, 115| 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Fate is called a disposition,
46 1, 115| principle, it is one; and thus fate is one. But if it be ~considered
47 1, 115| the mediate causes, this ~fate is multiple. In this sense
48 1, 115| sense the poet wrote: "Thy fate draws thee."~Aquin.: SMT
49 1, 115| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether fate is unchangeable?~Aquin.:
50 1, 115| 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that fate is not unchangeable. For
51 1, 115| is ~the fickle chain of fate to the unwavering simplicity
52 1, 115| is in us is moved." But fate is a "disposition inherent
53 1, 115| De Consol. iv). Therefore fate is ~changeable.~Aquin.:
54 1, 115| 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if fate is unchangeable, what is
55 1, 115| unchangeable, what is subject to fate happens ~unchangeably and
56 1, 115| But things ascribed to fate seem ~principally to be
57 1, 115| says (De Consol. iv) that fate is an ~unchangeable disposition.~
58 1, 115| second causes which we call fate, can ~be considered in two
59 1, 115| the other hand, held that fate is changeable, even as ~
60 1, 115| the Egyptians said that fate ~could be changed by certain
61 1, 115| must therefore say that fate, considered in regard to
62 1, 115| having said that the chain of fate is fickle, shortly afterwards ~
63 1, 115| all things are subject to fate?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116] A[
64 1, 115| all things are subject to fate. For Boethius says ~(De
65 1, 115| Consol. iv): "The chain of fate moves the heaven and the
66 1, 115| reciprocal ~transformation. By fate all things that are born
67 1, 115| excluded from the domain of fate.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116] A[
68 1, 115| De Civ. Dei v, 1) that fate is something ~real, as referred
69 1, 115| all things are subject to fate.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116] A[
70 1, 115| says (De Consol. iv) that fate "is a ~disposition inherent
71 1, 115| Q[9], ~A[2]). Therefore fate is in all things.~Aquin.:
72 1, 115| are above the ordering of fate."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[116]
73 1, 115| As stated above (A[2]), fate is the ordering of second ~
74 1, 115| causes, is subject also to fate. But whatever is done immediately ~
75 1, 115| neither is it subject ~to fate; such are creation, the
76 1, 115| the changeable order of fate." Hence it is clear that "
77 1, 115| involved in the chain of ~fate"; since so much the more
78 1, 115| contained in the order ~of fate. But it is not the same
79 1, 115| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Fate is to be referred to the
80 1, 115| power, is subject also to fate, as already ~stated.~Aquin.:
81 1, 115| therefore, are not subject to fate, as stated above.~
82 3, 36 | connected the stars with man's fate at the ~time of his birth
|