Part, Question
1 1, 10 | word "interminable" is ~a negative one. But negation only belongs
2 1, 13 | Para. 1/4~I answer that, Negative names applied to God, or
3 1, 16 | must be resolved into the negative, as when one says: "the
4 1, 30 | are introduced simply in a negative and removing sense, as plurality ~
5 1, 30 | in God, but have only a negative ~meaning. Others, however,
6 1, 33 | in a privative, or in a ~negative sense. If in a negative
7 1, 33 | negative sense. If in a negative sense, then whatever is
8 1, 33 | of the Father, is not a negative term ~only, but either that
9 1, 33 | is taken sometimes in a negative sense only, ~and in that
10 1, 39 | is false. Wherefore the negative of ~the proposition is true, "
11 1, 39 | proposition ~is true, and the negative is false; so that the meaning
12 1, 39 | proposition is false, and the negative is true. Yet Prepositivus
13 1, 39 | Prepositivus said ~that both the negative and affirmative are false,
14 1, 39 | suppositum"; ~whereas in the negative it denotes both the thing
15 1, 39 | person of the Son; and in the negative sense ~is that "to be God
16 1, 48 | in a privative and in a negative sense. Absence of good,
17 1, 58 | angels use affirmative and negative expressions, which are signs
18 1, 58 | angels use affirmative and negative forms of ~speech, shows
19 1, 39 | is false. Wherefore the negative of ~the proposition is true, "
20 1, 39 | proposition ~is true, and the negative is false; so that the meaning
21 1, 39 | proposition is false, and the negative is true. Yet Prepositivus
22 1, 39 | Prepositivus said ~that both the negative and affirmative are false,
23 1, 39 | suppositum"; ~whereas in the negative it denotes both the thing
24 1, 39 | person of the Son; and in the negative sense ~is that "to be God
25 1, 49 | in a privative and in a negative sense. Absence of good,
26 1, 59 | angels use affirmative and negative expressions, which are signs
27 1, 59 | angels use affirmative and negative forms of ~speech, shows
28 1, 84 | appears in affirmative and negative propositions. Therefore ~
29 2, 72 | are different from the negative precepts, against which ~
30 2, 72 | various affirmative and ~negative precepts, was that men might
31 2, 72 | being induced to this by the negative precepts, ~and afterwards
32 2, 72 | Wherefore the affirmative and negative precepts do not belong ~
33 2, 77 | opinion about a particular negative proposition, or vice ~versa:
34 2, 77 | opinion ~about a particular negative: because an act is directly
35 2, 100 | Law are distinct from ~the negative precepts; e.g. "Honor thy
36 2, 100 | strange gods before Me," is ~negative. Therefore these are two
37 2, 100 | precepts are distinct from the negative, ~when one is not comprised
38 2, 100 | precept is ~included in a negative, or vice versa, we do not
39 2, 100 | vice are forbidden by the negative precepts. But ~according
40 2, 100 | concerning our neighbor, the negative precepts should ~have preceded
41 2, 100 | respect of affirmative and ~negative precepts about the same
42 2, 100 | acts of ~virtue, while the negative precepts withdraw him from
43 2, 100 | been an affirmative and a negative precept. ~Therefore it was
44 2, 100 | framed in ~some matters, and negative precepts in others.~Aquin.:
45 2, 100 | another, which pertains to the negative ~precepts, extends to more
46 2, 31 | however, that while the negative precepts of the Law forbid ~
47 2, 31 | Ethic. ii, 6: wherefore negative ~precepts bind always and
48 2, 42 | to do good, and by ~the negative precepts to avoid evil.
49 2, 42 | only positive, but also negative precepts about charity;
50 2, 42 | precepts virtually include the negative precepts. Nevertheless ~
51 2, 51 | takes imprudence in the negative sense. It ~must be observed
52 2, 60 | affirmative in form, it implies a negative precept forbidding us to ~
53 2, 77 | boundary - and it is a negative precept that fixes the boundary
54 2, 77 | speaking, is to act against a negative precept.~Aquin.: SMT SS
55 2, 77 | aspect of an act ~against a negative precept, it is a special
56 2, 77 | transgression is opposed to negative ~precepts which regard the
57 2, 77 | transgression opposed to negative precepts: wherefore both,
58 2, 77 | infringement of an affirmative or ~negative precept, disposing to the
59 2, 92 | implying an answer in ~the negative. Now offering things to
60 2, 120 | Sabbath Day." Still ~the negative precepts had to be given
61 2, 120 | injury on no one: hence the negative precepts, which forbid the
62 2, 138 | are of greater import than negative ~precepts, since the affirmative
63 2, 138 | affirmative include the negative, but not vice versa. ~Therefore
64 2, 138 | Law to contain none but ~negative precepts in prohibition
65 2, 138 | precepts of ~fortitude are negative rather than affirmative.~
66 2, 138 | not affirmative but only negative, as stated above (A[1], ~
67 2, 138 | perseverance should have ~been negative and not affirmative.~Aquin.:
68 2, 168 | temperance, rather than a negative precept ~forbidding adultery
69 2, 187 | Douay version supplies the negative: 'Treat not . . . nor with . . . '], ~
70 Suppl, 6 | s ~will is contrary to a negative precept, which binds always
71 Suppl, 17| Lombard, and ~replies in the negative. Later in life he altered
72 Suppl, 18| Lombard, and replies in the ~negative. Later in life he altered
73 Suppl, 18| Lombard, and replies in the negative. Later in life he altered
74 Suppl, 18| Lombard, and replies in the negative. ~Later in life he altered
75 Suppl, 89| take the infinite in the negative sense, it indicates the
|