Part, Question
1 2, 139 | and so are continence and ~incontinence, perseverance, and effeminacy,"
2 2, 146 | That is, any kind of ~incontinence that has reference to lust."~
3 2, 153 | consider ~continence and incontinence. With regard to continence
4 2, 153 | 4) that "continence ~and incontinence are about the same things
5 2, 153 | Therefore continence ~and incontinence are also about that same
6 2, 153 | Therefore ~continence and incontinence refer properly to desires
7 2, 153 | speak of continence and incontinence in ~reference to venereal
8 2, 153 | thing" [*Categ. ~viii]. But incontinence is in the concupiscible,
9 2, 153 | says [*De Affectibus] that "incontinence is the ~evil inclination
10 2, 153 | to its first mover, and incontinence to ~the concupiscible power:
11 2, 154 | 156] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF INCONTINENCE (FOUR ARTICLES)~We must
12 2, 154 | ARTICLES)~We must now consider incontinence: and under this head there
13 2, 154 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether incontinence pertains to the soul or
14 2, 154 | to the body?~(2) Whether incontinence is a sin?~(3) The comparison
15 2, 154 | The comparison between incontinence and intemperance;~(4) Which
16 2, 154 | 4) Which is the worse, incontinence in anger, or incontinence
17 2, 154 | incontinence in anger, or incontinence in desire?~Aquin.: SMT SS
18 2, 154 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether incontinence pertains to the soul or
19 2, 154 | OBJ 1: It would seem that incontinence pertains not to the soul
20 2, 154 | diversity causes diversity of incontinence: for the ~Philosopher says (
21 2, 154 | as incontinent. Therefore incontinence pertains not to the ~soul
22 2, 154 | temperament of the body. But incontinence results from the bodily ~
23 2, 154 | atrabilious temper whose ~incontinence is one of unbridled desire."
24 2, 154 | unbridled desire." Therefore incontinence regards ~the body.~Aquin.:
25 2, 154 | overcomes it. Therefore incontinence pertains to the ~flesh rather
26 2, 154 | respect of continence and incontinence, for we ascribe ~neither
27 2, 154 | neither continence nor incontinence to the beasts, as the Philosopher ~
28 2, 154 | Ethic. vii, 3). Therefore incontinence is chiefly on the part of ~
29 2, 154 | merely an occasional cause of incontinence; since it is owing to ~a
30 2, 154 | the sufficient cause of incontinence, ~but are merely the occasion
31 2, 154 | conditions of continence or ~incontinence cease, because such people
32 2, 154 | that the direct cause of incontinence is on the part ~of the soul,
33 2, 154 | this is called "unbridled incontinence" or "impetuosity": secondly, ~
34 2, 154 | wherefore this kind of incontinence is ~called "weakness." Hence
35 2, 154 | Hence it is manifest that incontinence pertains ~chiefly to the
36 2, 154 | not a sufficient cause of incontinence, as stated above.~Aquin.:
37 2, 154 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether incontinence is a sin?~Aquin.: SMT SS
38 2, 154 | OBJ 1: It would seem that incontinence is not a sin. For as Augustine ~
39 2, 154 | man can by himself avoid incontinence, according to Wis. 8:21, "
40 2, 154 | God gave it." ~Therefore incontinence is not a sin.~Aquin.: SMT
41 2, 154 | incontinent man. Therefore ~incontinence is not a sin.~Aquin.: SMT
42 2, 154 | iv) that "Paul, through incontinence of divine love, ~exclaimed:
43 2, 154 | Gal. 2:20). Therefore incontinence is not ~a sin.~Aquin.: SMT
44 2, 154 | unmerciful," etc. ~Therefore incontinence is a sin.~Aquin.: SMT SS
45 2, 154 | Para. 1/2~I answer that, Incontinence about a matter may be considered
46 2, 154 | properly and simply: and thus ~incontinence is about concupiscences
47 2, 154 | 155], A[2]~). In this way incontinence is a sin for two reasons:
48 2, 154 | says (Ethic. vii, 4) that "incontinence is censurable not ~only
49 2, 154 | evil desires. Secondly, ~incontinence about a matter is considered,
50 2, 154 | About such things there is ~incontinence, not simply but relatively,
51 2, 154 | A[2], ad 3). In this way incontinence is ~a sin, not from the
52 2, 154 | Body Para. 2/2~Thirdly, incontinence is said to be about a matter,
53 2, 154 | with reason. Such like ~incontinence is no sin, but pertains
54 2, 154 | continent, does not show ~incontinence to be no sin, for, as stated
55 2, 154 | OBJ 3: This argument takes incontinence metaphorically and not ~
56 2, 154 | unpardonable. Now the sin of incontinence would appear to ~be more
57 2, 154 | grievous, apparently is incontinence: wherefore the ~Philosopher
58 2, 154 | Ethic. ii. 3]. Therefore incontinence of desire is ~less grievous
59 2, 154 | desire is ~less grievous than incontinence of anger.~Aquin.: SMT SS
60 2, 154 | more grievous it is. Now ~incontinence of anger would seem to be
61 2, 154 | than ~adultery, to which incontinence of desire leads. Therefore
62 2, 154 | desire leads. Therefore incontinence ~of anger is graver than
63 2, 154 | of anger is graver than incontinence of desire.~Aquin.: SMT SS
64 2, 154 | says (Ethic. vii, 6) that "incontinence ~of anger is less disgraceful
65 2, 154 | is less disgraceful than incontinence of desire."~Aquin.: SMT
66 2, 154 | answer that, The sin of incontinence may be considered in two
67 2, 154 | of reason. ~In this way incontinence of desire is worse than
68 2, 154 | of desire is worse than incontinence of anger, ~because the movement
69 2, 154 | 2/2~Secondly, the sin of incontinence may be considered with regard
70 2, 154 | forsaking reason; and thus incontinence ~of anger is, for the most
71 2, 154 | This argument considers incontinence with regard to its ~result.~
72 Suppl, 66| gives ~more evidence of incontinence than one who has several
|