Part, Question

 1   2, 20  |        ensue, he does not ~contract irregularity: but he would if death were
 2   2, 20  |             argument would prove if irregularity were the result ~of the
 3   2, 103 |          was nothing but a kind of ~irregularity. From this uncleanness,
 4   2, 103 |            away the uncleanness of ~irregularity. They do say, however, that
 5   2, 107 |            a certain uncleanness of irregularity, as also by ~touching the
 6   2, 62  |            3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Irregularity results from the act though
 7   2, 183 |         unable to dispense from an ~irregularity; wherefore a subject, if
 8   2, 183 |           be old or ~infirm), or of irregularity arising, for instance, from
 9   3, 37  |            uncleanness of a certain irregularity, as stated in the FS, ~Q[
10   3, 89  |         committed a sin to which an irregularity is attached; ~wherefore
11   3, 89  |      consequence not of sin, but of irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[89] A[
12 Suppl, 8 |            was in expiation of the ~irregularity incurred, from which all
13 Suppl, 20|         attached to it a ~defect of irregularity or a sentence of excommunication,
14 Suppl, 20|            is when he finds that an irregularity has ~been contracted, for
15 Suppl, 39|            incur the punishment of ~irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[39] A[
16 Suppl, 39|            2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Irregularity is incurred not only on
17 Suppl, 39|        homicide, nor does he ~incur irregularity (unless he was occupying
18 Suppl, 39|             is not in fault, ~since irregularity is incurred even without
19 Suppl, 39|            1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Irregularity is not a punishment due
20 Suppl, 60|          remitted, as evidenced by ~irregularity. For repentance does not
21 Suppl, 63|       person ~incurs the penalty of irregularity on account of being married
22 Suppl, 63|            4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Irregularity is not always incurred on
23 Suppl, 63|              OTC Para. 2/2~Further, irregularity is not contracted through
24 Suppl, 63|            such as fornication. Yet irregularity is ~contracted through a
25 Suppl, 66|            1 - OF BIGAMY AND OF THE IRREGULARITY CONTRACTED THEREBY (FIVE
26 Suppl, 66|             consider bigamy and the irregularity ~contracted thereby. Under
27 Suppl, 66|             of inquiry:~(1) Whether irregularity attaches to the bigamy that
28 Suppl, 66|       successive wives?~(2) Whether irregularity is contracted by one who
29 Suppl, 66|          wives at once?~(3) Whether irregularity is contracted by marrying
30 Suppl, 66|             Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether irregularity attaches to bigamy?~Aquin.:
31 Suppl, 66|           OBJ 1: It would seem that irregularity is not attached to the bigamy ~
32 Suppl, 66|           Further, if bigamy causes irregularity, this is either because
33 Suppl, 66|     Therefore bigamy ~nowise causes irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
34 Suppl, 66|         does away with this, causes irregularity. And there are four kinds ~
35 Suppl, 66|       marries a widow. Accordingly ~irregularity attaches to all of these.~
36 Suppl, 66|         stated above, bigamy causes irregularity, because it ~destroys the
37 Suppl, 66|         same time in order to cause irregularity. Hence the decree of Innocent ~
38 Suppl, 66|             is sufficient to cause ~irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
39 Suppl, 66|             Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether irregularity results from bigamy, when
40 Suppl, 66|           OBJ 1: It would seem that irregularity does not result from bigamy
41 Suppl, 66|             Church. Therefore since irregularity does not result from bigamy ~
42 Suppl, 66|              it would seem that no ~irregularity attaches to bigamy of this
43 Suppl, 66|            several women. Therefore irregularity is not contracted by reason
44 Suppl, 66|            Para. 1/1~I answer that, Irregularity is contracted in the two
45 Suppl, 66|           principal kind in causing irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
46 Suppl, 66|             forthwith, because the ~irregularity is the result not of the
47 Suppl, 66|             Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether irregularity is contracted by marrying
48 Suppl, 66|           OBJ 1: It would seem that irregularity is not contracted by marrying
49 Suppl, 66|            of bigamy does not cause irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
50 Suppl, 66|         kind does not always ~cause irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
51 Suppl, 66|            of bigamy does not cause irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
52 Suppl, 66|            must say otherwise that ~irregularity is caused by a defect in
53 Suppl, 66|            3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Irregularity is not the infliction of
54 Suppl, 66|         voluntary in order to cause irregularity. Hence a man who marries
55 Suppl, 66|             is a greater thing than irregularity. Therefore ~it removes irregularity.~
56 Suppl, 66| irregularity. Therefore ~it removes irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
57 Suppl, 66|            an act. ~Now such is the irregularity of bigamy. Therefore, etc.~
58 Suppl, 66|              Christ. Therefore this irregularity is removed.~Aquin.: SMT
59 Suppl, 66|           the New ~Law, removes the irregularity consequent upon bigamy.~
60 Suppl, 66|          marriage. ~Wherefore since irregularity results from marriage, it
61 Suppl, 66|      directed to the removal of an ~irregularity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[
62 Suppl, 66|            Para. 1/1~I answer that, Irregularity attaches to bigamy not by
63 Suppl, 66|             altogether from such an irregularity; but a bishop, only as ~
64 Suppl, 66|             this is not ~removed by irregularity. [*Leonine edition reads "
65 Suppl, 67|              but of a certain legal irregularity. Wherefore a priest could