1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-7000 | 7001-7500 | 7501-7588
Part, Question
2001 3, 16 | Although the human nature in Christ is something new, yet ~the
2002 3, 16 | there are two ~supposita in Christ [*Cf. Q[2], AA[3],6].~Aquin.:
2003 3, 16 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether Christ can be called a lordly man?~[*
2004 3, 16 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ can be called a lordly man.
2005 3, 16 | and he is speaking of Christ. ~Therefore it seems that
2006 3, 16 | Therefore it seems that Christ was a lordly man.~Aquin.:
2007 3, 16 | as lordship belongs to Christ by reason of His Divine ~
2008 3, 16 | Dionysius (Eccl. Hier. iv) calls Christ the "most ~Divine Jesus."
2009 3, 16 | Therefore with like reason may Christ be called a lordly ~man.~
2010 3, 16 | may rightly call Jesus Christ a lordly man, since He is
2011 3, 16 | when we say "the Man ~Christ Jesus," we signify the eternal
2012 3, 16 | if, when we say "the Man Christ Jesus," ~we mean a created
2013 3, 16 | assert two supposita in ~Christ, this man might be called
2014 3, 16 | have said this," viz. that Christ Jesus is a lordly man, "
2015 3, 16 | possession." And hence the man Christ, Who is our Lord, cannot
2016 3, 16 | divide words ~predicated of Christ, in this way, viz. that
2017 3, 16 | pertained ~to both natures, as "Christ" or "Lord." Hence they granted
2018 3, 16 | Hence they granted that Christ ~was born of a Virgin, and
2019 3, 16 | words which are said of ~Christ either in His Divine or
2020 3, 16 | Scriptures, or have been ~said of Christ by the Saints, or by Himself
2021 3, 16 | distinguish things predicated of Christ, yet we ~distinguish that
2022 3, 16 | Nature are predicated of Christ in His ~Divine Nature, and
2023 3, 16 | nature are predicated ~of Christ in His human nature. Hence
2024 3, 16 | contraries are predicated of ~Christ, not in the same, but in
2025 3, 16 | Divine Nature belongs to Christ's ~human nature; such as
2026 3, 16 | one nature, as the word "Christ," by which is signified "
2027 3, 16 | from what substance we name Christ; ~because since the unity
2028 3, 16 | property of flesh. Now in Christ each nature is united to
2029 3, 16 | Further, man as predicated of Christ stands for the Person of
2030 3, 16 | according to the flesh." Now Christ, as man, is of the seed
2031 3, 16 | Person or hypostasis in Christ are the same as the ~suppositum
2032 3, 16 | 1~Whether this is true: "Christ is a creature"?~Aquin.:
2033 3, 16 | seem that this is true: "Christ is a creature." For Pope ~
2034 3, 16 | Now we may ~predicate of Christ whatever the Son of God
2035 3, 16 | Therefore this is true; Christ is a creature.~Aquin.: SMT
2036 3, 16 | Hence both may be said of Christ, viz. that He is a creature
2037 3, 16 | rather than the ~body. But Christ, by reason of the body which
2038 3, 16 | says (De Trin. i): "Was Christ made by a word? ~Was Christ
2039 3, 16 | Christ made by a word? ~Was Christ created by a command?" as
2040 3, 16 | must not be granted that "Christ is a creature."~Aquin.:
2041 3, 16 | Arian heretics said that Christ was a creature and less
2042 3, 16 | not say absolutely that Christ is a "creature" or "less
2043 3, 16 | be predicated simply of Christ by reason of His human nature; ~
2044 3, 16 | thus we say simply that Christ suffered, died and was buried:
2045 3, 16 | the word "creature" of Christ, without any qualifying
2046 3, 16 | be predicated equally of Christ. Hence Damascene says (De ~
2047 3, 16 | Fide Orth. iii, 4) that "Christ Who God and Man, is called
2048 3, 16 | one hypostasis," i.e. of Christ, "is uncreated in its Godhead
2049 3, 16 | without ~qualification, "Christ is incorporeal" or "impassible";
2050 3, 16 | of Manes, who held that Christ had not a true body, nor
2051 3, 16 | with a qualification, that Christ was ~incorporeal and impassible "
2052 3, 16 | 1~Whether this Man, i.e. Christ, began to be?~Aquin.: SMT
2053 3, 16 | seem that this Man, i.e. Christ, began to be. For ~Augustine
2054 3, 16 | and men - the Man Jesus Christ." But ~what was not always,
2055 3, 16 | Therefore this Man, i.e. Christ, ~began to be.~Aquin.: SMT
2056 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Christ began to be Man. But to
2057 3, 16 | suppositum of human nature. But Christ ~was not always a suppositum
2058 3, 16 | written (Heb. 13:8): "Jesus Christ yesterday and ~today: and
2059 3, 16 | this Man" - pointing to ~Christ - "began to be," unless
2060 3, 16 | Faith, which affirms that in Christ there is one suppositum ~
2061 3, 16 | this Man," pointing to Christ, the eternal suppositum
2062 3, 16 | say that ~the Man Jesus Christ was not, before the world
2063 3, 16 | this does ~not follow: "Christ began to be Man - therefore
2064 3, 16 | Man," as it is taken for Christ, although it ~signifies
2065 3, 16 | this is false: "The Man Christ began ~to be": but this
2066 3, 16 | be": but this is true: "Christ began to be Man."~~Aquin.:
2067 3, 16 | 1~Whether this is true: "Christ as Man is a creature"?~Aquin.:
2068 3, 16 | seem that this is false: "Christ as Man is a creature," ~
2069 3, 16 | began to be." For nothing in Christ is created except the human ~
2070 3, 16 | nature. But this is false: "Christ as Man is the human nature."
2071 3, 16 | Therefore ~this is also false; Christ as Man is a creature.~Aquin.:
2072 3, 16 | absolutely grant that "the ~Man Christ is a creature"; nor consequently
2073 3, 16 | nor consequently that "Christ as Man is a ~creature."~
2074 3, 16 | 23. But this is false: "Christ as ~Man is per se and simply
2075 3, 16 | Hence this, too, is false; "Christ ~as Man is a creature."~
2076 3, 16 | creature. But this is ~false: "Christ as Man is Creator." Therefore
2077 3, 16 | Therefore this is true: "Christ as Man ~is a creature."~
2078 3, 16 | answer that, When we say "Christ as Man" this word "man"
2079 3, 16 | suppositum of the human nature in Christ is eternal and uncreated,
2080 3, 16 | uncreated, this ~will be false: "Christ as Man is a creature." But
2081 3, 16 | it is the same to ~say "Christ as Man" and to say "Christ
2082 3, 16 | Christ as Man" and to say "Christ as He is a Man." Hence this
2083 3, 16 | granted rather than denied: "Christ as Man is a creature." But
2084 3, 16 | instance were one to say: "Christ as ~'this' Man is a creature."~
2085 3, 16 | 1~Reply OBJ 1: Although Christ is not the human nature,
2086 3, 16 | yet ~it is granted that "Christ as Man is a creature."~Aquin.:
2087 3, 16 | a creature ~simply. But Christ is a suppositum not merely
2088 3, 16 | 1~Whether this is true: "Christ as Man is God"?~Aquin.:
2089 3, 16 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ, as Man, is God. For Christ
2090 3, 16 | Christ, as Man, is God. For Christ is God by ~the grace of
2091 3, 16 | the grace of union. But Christ, as Man, has the grace of
2092 3, 16 | grace of union. Therefore ~Christ as Man is God.~Aquin.: SMT
2093 3, 16 | iniquities for My own sake." But Christ ~as Man forgives sin, according
2094 3, 16 | forgive sins," etc. Therefore ~Christ as Man is God.~Aquin.: SMT
2095 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Christ is not Man in common, but
2096 3, 16 | this particular Man. ~Now Christ, as this Man, is God, since
2097 3, 16 | God naturally. Therefore Christ as Man is God.~Aquin.: SMT
2098 3, 16 | contrary, Whatever belongs to Christ as Man belongs to every
2099 3, 16 | belongs to every man. ~Now, if Christ as Man is God, it follows
2100 3, 16 | way it ~is not true that Christ as Man is God, because the
2101 3, 16 | suppositum of the human nature in Christ is the Person of the Son
2102 3, 16 | be God, it is true that Christ, as Man, ~is God. Nevertheless
2103 3, 16 | denied rather than granted: "Christ as Man is God."~Aquin.:
2104 3, 16 | same, that it belongs to ~Christ to be ordained to be God
2105 3, 16 | Nature. Hence this is true: "Christ as Man has the grace of ~
2106 3, 16 | union"; yet not this: "Christ as Man is God."~Aquin.:
2107 3, 16 | the suppositum; and hence "Christ as this Man, is God, ~is
2108 3, 16 | a truer proposition than Christ as Man is God."~Aquin.:
2109 3, 16 | 1~Whether this is true: "Christ as Man is a hypostasis or
2110 3, 16 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ as Man is a hypostasis or
2111 3, 16 | to every man belongs to Christ as Man, since He is like ~
2112 3, 16 | man is a person. Therefore Christ as Man is a person.~Aquin.:
2113 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Christ as Man is a substance of
2114 3, 16 | De Duab. Nat.). Therefore Christ as Man is a ~person.~Aquin.:
2115 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Christ as Man is a being of human
2116 3, 16 | nature is a person. Therefore Christ as Man ~is a person.~Aquin.:
2117 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Christ as Man is not an eternal
2118 3, 16 | eternal person. Therefore if ~Christ as Man is a person it would
2119 3, 16 | it would follow that in Christ there are two ~persons -
2120 3, 16 | Hence ~when it is said: "Christ as Man is a person," if
2121 3, 16 | suppositum, it is clear that Christ as Man is a person, since
2122 3, 16 | it may be taken that in ~Christ a proper personality, caused
2123 3, 16 | nature; and in this way Christ as Man is not ~a person,
2124 3, 16 | this is proper to ~the Man Christ that the Person subsisting
2125 3, 16 | can the human nature in Christ, ~although it may be called
2126 3, 16 | in ~which we deny that "Christ as Man is a person" we must
2127 3, 17 | 17] Out. Para. 1/3 - OF CHRIST'S UNITY OF BEING (TWO ARTICLES)~
2128 3, 17 | consider what pertains to Christ's unity in common. For,
2129 3, 17 | not only one knowledge ~in Christ, and it will be concluded
2130 3, 17 | not only one nativity in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] Out.
2131 3, 17 | 3~Hence we must consider Christ's unity (1) of being; (2)
2132 3, 17 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether Christ is one or two?~(2) Whether
2133 3, 17 | there is only one being in Christ?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
2134 3, 17 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether Christ is one or two?~Aquin.: SMT
2135 3, 17 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ is not one, but two. For
2136 3, 17 | there are two. ~Therefore Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2137 3, 17 | another there are two. Now ~Christ is one thing and another;
2138 3, 17 | other as man." ~Therefore Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2139 3, 17 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Christ is not only man; for, if
2140 3, 17 | else than man, and thus in ~Christ there is one thing and another.
2141 3, 17 | thing and another. Therefore Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2142 3, 17 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, Christ is something that the Father
2143 3, 17 | Father is not. Therefore Christ is one thing and another. ~
2144 3, 17 | and another. ~Therefore Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2145 3, 17 | notwithstanding the unity ~of Person, Christ is two on account of the
2146 3, 17 | predicated denominatively. Now Christ has a duality of ~nature.
2147 3, 17 | duality of ~nature. Therefore Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2148 3, 17 | says ~(Praedic.). Now in Christ there are two substantial
2149 3, 17 | and the Divine. Therefore Christ is one thing and another.
2150 3, 17 | and another. Therefore ~Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2151 3, 17 | one." But we confess that Christ is. Therefore Christ is
2152 3, 17 | that Christ is. Therefore Christ is one.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2153 3, 17 | 29], A[4], ad 1. But in Christ, since there are two natures, ~
2154 3, 17 | is signified by the word Christ, is the Divine ~Nature and
2155 3, 17 | cannot be predicated of Christ in ~the abstract, but only
2156 3, 17 | we cannot truly say that "Christ is human nature," ~because
2157 3, 17 | suppositum. But ~we say that Christ is a man, even as Christ
2158 3, 17 | Christ is a man, even as Christ is God. Now God signifies
2159 3, 17 | dual number is placed in Christ with regard to the ~natures.
2160 3, 17 | predicated in the abstract of ~Christ, it would follow that Christ
2161 3, 17 | Christ, it would follow that Christ is two. But because the
2162 3, 17 | natures ~are not predicated of Christ, except as they are signified
2163 3, 17 | two" be ~predicated of Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
2164 3, 17 | placed two supposita in Christ, and one Person, which,
2165 3, 17 | placed two supposita in Christ, they said ~that God is
2166 3, 17 | Person, ~they said that Christ is one, in the masculine,
2167 3, 17 | asserted two Persons in Christ, said that Christ is two ~
2168 3, 17 | Persons in Christ, said that Christ is two ~not only in the
2169 3, 17 | person and one suppositum in Christ, as is clear from Q[2],
2170 3, 17 | follows that we say that Christ is one not merely in the
2171 3, 17 | predicate, so as to mean that Christ is both; but it ~refers
2172 3, 17 | 2: When it is said that "Christ is one thing and another," ~
2173 3, 17 | Reply OBJ 3: This is false, "Christ is only man"; because it
2174 3, 17 | proposition - for instance, ~"Christ is only that which is man."
2175 3, 17 | OBJ 4: When it is said, "Christ is something that the Father
2176 3, 17 | Son. But when it is said: "Christ is something ~that is not
2177 3, 17 | it does not follow ~that Christ is one thing and another,
2178 3, 17 | suppositum of the human nature in Christ, which is the Person of
2179 3, 17 | predicated in the abstract of Christ; ~hence it cannot be said
2180 3, 17 | cannot be said simply that Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2181 3, 17 | is implied by the word "Christ." Hence, although ~Christ
2182 3, 17 | Christ." Hence, although ~Christ has duality of nature, yet,
2183 3, 17 | it cannot be said that Christ is two.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2184 3, 17 | there is only one being in Christ?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
2185 3, 17 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there is not merely one
2186 3, 17 | the ~nature is doubled in Christ. But being follows the nature,
2187 3, 17 | from the form. Hence in Christ there are two beings.~Aquin.:
2188 3, 17 | whereas the being of the Man Christ is not the Divine ~Nature,
2189 3, 17 | is not only one being in ~Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
2190 3, 17 | is only one being. But in Christ ~there are two natures,
2191 3, 17 | one Person. Therefore in Christ ~there is not only one being.~
2192 3, 17 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, in Christ the soul gives some being
2193 3, 17 | uncreated. Therefore in Christ there is another being besides
2194 3, 17 | Divine ~being; and thus in Christ there is not only one being.~
2195 3, 17 | there were two ~beings in Christ, and not one only, Christ
2196 3, 17 | Christ, and not one only, Christ would be two, and not one.~
2197 3, 17 | answer that, Because in Christ there are two natures and
2198 3, 17 | belonging to the nature in Christ must ~be two; and that those
2199 3, 17 | belonging to the hypostasis in Christ must be only ~one. Now being
2200 3, 17 | to assert two beings in Christ - one, inasmuch as He ~is
2201 3, 17 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: In Christ the soul gives being to
2202 3, 18 | 18] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF CHRIST'S UNITY OF WILL (SIX ARTICLES)~
2203 3, 18 | the human are distinct in Christ?~(2) Whether in Christ's
2204 3, 18 | in Christ?~(2) Whether in Christ's human nature the will
2205 3, 18 | there were several wills in Christ?~(4) Whether there was free-will
2206 3, 18 | Whether there was free-will in Christ?~(5) Whether Christ's human
2207 3, 18 | free-will in Christ?~(5) Whether Christ's human will was always
2208 3, 18 | contrariety of wills in Christ?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2209 3, 18 | Whether there are two wills in Christ?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2210 3, 18 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there are not two wills,
2211 3, 18 | in ~whoever wills. But in Christ the first mover and commander
2212 3, 18 | the ~Divine will, since in Christ everything human was moved
2213 3, 18 | Hence it seems that in Christ there was only one will,
2214 3, 18 | Now the human nature of Christ was the instrument of ~His
2215 3, 18 | Hence the human nature of Christ was not moved by its own ~
2216 3, 18 | that alone is multiplied in Christ which belongs to the ~nature.
2217 3, 18 | there is but one will in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2218 3, 18 | belongs to the person. But in Christ there ~was and is but one
2219 3, 18 | one person. Therefore in Christ there is only one will.~
2220 3, 18 | placed only one will in Christ; but they seem to ~have
2221 3, 18 | an intellectual soul in Christ, but maintained that the
2222 3, 18 | 9), it followed ~that in Christ there was no human will;
2223 3, 18 | one composite nature in Christ ~were forced to place one
2224 3, 18 | held only one ~will in Christ. But later on, Macarius,
2225 3, 18 | that there is one will in Christ, although they held that
2226 3, 18 | although they held that in Christ ~there are two natures united
2227 3, 18 | because they believed that ~Christ's human nature never moved
2228 3, 18 | that there are two wills in Christ, in the ~following passage: "
2229 3, 18 | old taught us ~concerning Christ, and as He taught us Himself,
2230 3, 18 | there are two wills in ~Christ, i.e. one human, the other
2231 3, 18 | was in the human nature of Christ was moved at the ~bidding
2232 3, 18 | does not follow that in Christ there ~was no movement of
2233 3, 18 | 105], A[4]. And thus, too, Christ by His ~human will followed
2234 3, 18 | that the human nature of ~Christ was the instrument of the
2235 3, 18 | is necessary to place in Christ a human will, not merely
2236 3, 18 | Hence the human will of ~Christ had a determinate mode from
2237 3, 18 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether in Christ there was a will of sensuality
2238 3, 18 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there was no will of sensuality ~
2239 3, 18 | sensitive appetite. Hence in Christ there was no will of sensuality.~
2240 3, 18 | nothing ~serpent-like in Christ; for He had the likeness
2241 3, 18 | Remiss. i, 32). ~Hence in Christ there was no will of sensuality.~
2242 3, 18 | was said (A[1]). But ~in Christ there was only one nature
2243 3, 18 | besides the Divine. Hence in Christ ~there was only one human
2244 3, 18 | pertains to the human will of Christ. Now ~sorrow pertains to
2245 3, 18 | Therefore, seemingly, in Christ there is a will of ~sensuality
2246 3, 18 | must be allowed that in Christ there was a sensual appetite,
2247 3, 18 | of the sensuality, which Christ assumed, but as regards
2248 3, 18 | fomes," which was not in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2249 3, 18 | be but one human will in Christ, even as ~there is but one
2250 3, 18 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether in Christ there were two wills as
2251 3, 18 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there were two wills as
2252 3, 18 | is called {boulesis}. Now Christ in His human nature ~had
2253 3, 18 | foregoing wills were in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2254 3, 18 | both of ~which were in Christ. Therefore there was a double
2255 3, 18 | Victor, De Quat. Volunt. Christ.] ~ascribe to Christ "a
2256 3, 18 | Volunt. Christ.] ~ascribe to Christ "a will of piety," which
2257 3, 18 | of ~reason. Therefore in Christ on the part of reason there
2258 3, 18 | the will of reason. But ~Christ is one man. Therefore in
2259 3, 18 | is one man. Therefore in Christ there is only one human
2260 3, 18 | of acts of ~the will in Christ on the part of the reason.
2261 3, 18 | the power of the will, in Christ there is but one human will,
2262 3, 18 | we thus distinguish in Christ a will as nature, which
2263 3, 18 | Whether there was free-will in Christ?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2264 3, 18 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there was no free-will.
2265 3, 18 | there was no choice in Christ and consequently no free-will,
2266 3, 18 | does not appear to ~be in Christ, because we do not take
2267 3, 18 | we ~are certain of. But Christ was certain of everything.
2268 3, 18 | consequently no free-will in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2269 3, 18 | free-will is indifferent. But Christ's will was ~determined to
2270 3, 18 | there was no free-will in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2271 3, 18 | Therefore there was free-will in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2272 3, 18 | twofold act of the ~will in Christ; one whereby He was drawn
2273 3, 18 | as reason" is placed in Christ, we must also place ~choice,
2274 3, 18 | Damascene excludes choice from Christ, in so far as he ~considers
2275 3, 18 | Reply OBJ 3: The will of Christ, though determined to good,
2276 3, 18 | good. Hence it pertains to Christ, even as to ~the blessed,
2277 3, 18 | Whether the human will of Christ was altogether conformed
2278 3, 18 | seem that the human will in Christ did not will anything ~except
2279 3, 18 | 39:9) in the person of ~Christ: "That I should do Thy will:
2280 3, 18 | wills. Hence it ~seems that Christ's human will willed nothing
2281 3, 18 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, Christ's soul had most perfect
2282 3, 18 | 3:19, ~"the charity of Christ, which surpasseth all knowledge."
2283 3, 18 | Therefore ~the human will in Christ willed nothing else than
2284 3, 18 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, Christ was a true comprehensor.
2285 3, 18 | Hence in His human will Christ wills ~nothing else than
2286 3, 18 | Contra Maxim. ii, 20): "When Christ ~says 'Not what I will,
2287 3, 18 | As was said (AA[2],3), in Christ according to His human ~
2288 3, 18 | was the will of God that Christ should undergo pain, suffering,
2289 3, 18 | will considered as nature, Christ could will what God did ~
2290 3, 18 | 1: By His rational will Christ willed the Divine will to
2291 3, 18 | 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Christ was at once comprehensor
2292 3, 18 | contrariety of wills in Christ? ~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2293 3, 18 | contrariety of wills in Christ. For ~contrariety of wills
2294 3, 18 | v, text. 49, seq.). Now Christ in His different wills ~
2295 3, 18 | against Apollinarius]: "When Christ says ~'Father, if it be
2296 3, 18 | contrariety of wills in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2297 3, 18 | wills. But this was in Christ; for by the will of charity
2298 3, 18 | was contrariety of will in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
2299 3, 18 | and the sensitive ~will in Christ wished what the Divine will
2300 3, 18 | will of the human reason in Christ wished the passion. For
2301 3, 18 | For the ~absolute will of Christ wished the salvation of
2302 3, 18 | nor the will of reason in Christ was ~impeded or retarded
2303 3, 18 | nor the will of ~reason in Christ shrank from or retarded
2304 3, 18 | movement of the sensuality in Christ. For it pleased ~Christ,
2305 3, 18 | Christ. For it pleased ~Christ, in His Divine will, and
2306 3, 18 | Hence it is clear that in Christ there was no opposition
2307 3, 18 | The fact of any will in Christ willing something else than ~
2308 3, 18 | permission ~the human nature in Christ was moved by its proper
2309 3, 18 | flesh: this did not occur in Christ. Hence in Christ ~there
2310 3, 18 | occur in Christ. Hence in Christ ~there was no contrariety
2311 3, 18 | Reply OBJ 3: The agony in Christ was not in the rational
2312 3, 18 | Now this did not occur in Christ, since by His reason He
2313 3, 18 | there was an agony in ~Christ as regards the sensitive
2314 3, 19 | Para. 1/1 - OF THE UNITY OF CHRIST'S OPERATION (FOUR ARTICLES)~
2315 3, 19 | now consider the unity of Christ's operation; and under this ~
2316 3, 19 | inquiry: ~(1) Whether in Christ there was one or several
2317 3, 19 | Manhood?~(2) Whether in Christ there were several operations
2318 3, 19 | human nature?~(3) Whether Christ by His human operation merited
2319 3, 19 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether in Christ there is only one operation
2320 3, 19 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there is but one operation
2321 3, 19 | composite operation in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19] A[
2322 3, 19 | Now the human nature in Christ was the instrument of ~the
2323 3, 19 | Divine and human natures in ~Christ are the same.~Aquin.: SMT
2324 3, 19 | OBJ 3: Further, since in Christ there are two natures in
2325 3, 19 | belong to singulars. Hence in Christ ~there is only one operation
2326 3, 19 | there is one operation in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19] A[
2327 3, 19 | Hence ~it seems that in Christ there is but one operation
2328 3, 19 | who placed one will in Christ placed one operation in
2329 3, 19 | placed one operation in Christ. Now in ~order better to
2330 3, 19 | appetite, so in the Lord Jesus Christ the human ~nature is moved
2331 3, 19 | inasmuch as the Godhead of Christ did one thing ~by Itself,
2332 3, 19 | and wrought by the one ~Christ, differ greatly; for some
2333 3, 19 | Body Para. 3/4~Therefore in Christ the human nature has its
2334 3, 19 | and the human ~nature in Christ) "do what is proper to each
2335 3, 19 | Godhead and manhood in ~Christ, it would be necessary to
2336 3, 19 | it would follow that in Christ there was only the Divine ~
2337 3, 19 | first the human nature in Christ is supposed to be imperfect;
2338 3, 19 | operations in the same Lord Jesus Christ our ~true God"; i.e. the
2339 3, 19 | OBJ 1: Dionysius places in Christ a theandric, i.e. a God-manlike ~
2340 3, 19 | walk; ~yet both were in Christ supernaturally. So, too,
2341 3, 19 | understood two operations in Christ, one of the Divine and ~
2342 3, 19 | Ghost in their ~mercy wished Christ to do and to suffer human
2343 3, 19 | Hence the operation of Christ's human nature, as the instrument
2344 3, 19 | wherewith the manhood of Christ saves us and that wherewith
2345 3, 19 | nevertheless, the human nature in ~Christ, inasmuch as it is a certain
2346 3, 19 | numerically one. ~So, likewise, in Christ there are necessarily two
2347 3, 19 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether in Christ there are several human
2348 3, 19 | 1: It would seem that in Christ there are several human
2349 3, 19 | several human operations. ~For Christ as man communicates with
2350 3, 19 | are different. Therefore Christ as man has several ~operations.~
2351 3, 19 | distinguished by their acts. Now ~in Christ's soul there were divers
2352 3, 19 | operations. Therefore in Christ there are ~divers operations
2353 3, 19 | upon the nature." But in Christ there is only one human ~
2354 3, 19 | human ~nature. Therefore in Christ there is only one human
2355 3, 19 | plurality of operations in Christ.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19] A[
2356 3, 19 | above. But in the ~Man Jesus Christ there was no motion of the
2357 3, 19 | is there one operation in Christ, than in any other ~man
2358 3, 19 | as stated above; yet in Christ these operations were more ~
2359 3, 19 | diversity of operations from Christ's humanity, ~nor that which
2360 3, 19 | Whether the human action of Christ could be meritorious to
2361 3, 19 | that the human action of Christ could not be ~meritorious
2362 3, 19 | Him. For before His death Christ was a comprehensor even ~
2363 3, 19 | not the same. Therefore Christ before His passion did not ~
2364 3, 19 | due to him. But because Christ is ~the Son of God by nature,
2365 3, 19 | by their works. And hence Christ Who, from the beginning, ~
2366 3, 19 | from its possession. But Christ has the glory of the soul,
2367 3, 19 | was brought about that ~in Christ the glory of the soul should
2368 3, 19 | overflow to the body. Hence ~Christ did not merit the glory
2369 3, 19 | Further, the manifestation of Christ's excellence is a good,
2370 3, 19 | excellence is a good, not ~of Christ Himself, but of those who
2371 3, 19 | reward to such as love Christ that He will be manifested
2372 3, 19 | Myself to him." Therefore Christ ~did not merit the manifestation
2373 3, 19 | greatness must be attributed to Christ, ~consequently He must have
2374 3, 19 | want would detract from Christ's dignity and ~perfection
2375 3, 19 | would be necessary that Christ should have been without
2376 3, 19 | them would have diminished Christ's dignity more ~than His
2377 3, 19 | Hence we must say that Christ had, by merit, the glory ~
2378 3, 19 | glory ~of the soul, which Christ did not merit. Hence if
2379 3, 19 | OBJ 2: Because by nature Christ is God and the Son of God,
2380 3, 19 | thus it could fall under Christ's merit.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2381 3, 19 | 4: The manifestation of Christ's excellence is His good
2382 3, 19 | even this is referred to Christ ~inasmuch as they are His
2383 3, 19 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether Christ could merit for others?~
2384 3, 19 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ could not merit for others.
2385 3, 19 | it is not possible that Christ merited for others.~Aquin.:
2386 3, 19 | Further, of the fulness of Christ's grace we all receive,
2387 3, 19 | 16. Now other men having Christ's grace cannot merit for ~
2388 3, 19 | by ~their justice." Hence Christ could not merit anything
2389 3, 19 | from Rm. 4:4. ~Therefore if Christ merited our salvation it
2390 3, 19 | He does not save, since Christ's merit extends to all.~
2391 3, 19 | therefore, does the merit of Christ ~reach others.~Aquin.: SMT
2392 3, 19 | AA[1],5), grace was in Christ not ~merely as in an individual,
2393 3, 19 | person. And hence it is that Christ's merit extends to others
2394 3, 19 | So, too, the ~merit of Christ, Who has been appointed
2395 3, 19 | OBJ 2: Others receive of Christ's fulness not indeed the
2396 3, 19 | men merit ~for others, as Christ did.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19]
2397 3, 19 | generation, so, too, the merit of Christ reaches others only by spiritual ~
2398 3, 19 | we are incorporated ~with Christ, according to Gal. 3:27, "
2399 3, 19 | as have been ~baptized in Christ, have put on Christ"; and
2400 3, 19 | baptized in Christ, have put on Christ"; and it is by grace that
2401 3, 19 | to be incorporated with Christ. And thus man's salvation ~
2402 3, 20 | 20] Out. Para. 1/3 - OF CHRIST'S SUBJECTION TO THE FATHER (
2403 3, 20 | such things as belong to Christ in relation to the ~Father.
2404 3, 20 | Hence we must consider (1) Christ's subjection to the Father; (
2405 3, 20 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether Christ is subject to the Father?~(
2406 3, 20 | Whether we may say that Christ is subject to the Father?~
2407 3, 20 | that we may not say that Christ was subject to the ~Father.
2408 3, 20 | we cannot say simply that Christ is a creature, as was ~stated
2409 3, 20 | we cannot say simply that Christ is ~subject to God the Father.~
2410 3, 20 | to the ~human nature of Christ; for Damascene says (De
2411 3, 20 | we may not call it" (i.e. Christ's human nature) ~"a servant;
2412 3, 20 | and ~'filiation.'" Hence Christ in His human nature is not
2413 3, 20 | in the form ~of a servant Christ is subject to the Father.~
2414 3, 20 | triple subjection to God Christ professes of ~Himself. The
2415 3, 20 | said to be ~greater than Christ in His human nature. The
2416 3, 20 | subjection is ~attributed to Christ, inasmuch as all that befell
2417 3, 20 | inasmuch as all that befell Christ is believed to ~have happened
2418 3, 20 | says (Coel. Hier. ~iv) that Christ "is subject to the ordinance
2419 3, 20 | are not to understand that Christ is a creature ~simply, but
2420 3, 20 | are to understand that ~Christ is subject to the Father
2421 3, 20 | this way nothing ~prevents Christ being subject or servant
2422 3, 20 | Augustine says (De Trin. i, 8): "Christ will give the ~kingdom to
2423 3, 20 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether Christ is subject to Himself?~Aquin.:
2424 3, 20 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ is not subject to Himself.
2425 3, 20 | I, ch. xxvi) ~received: "Christ is neither servant nor master
2426 3, 20 | iii, 21): "The one Being, Christ, cannot be the ~servant
2427 3, 20 | master of Himself." Now Christ is said to be the servant
2428 3, 20 | is subject to Him. Hence Christ is not subject ~to Himself.~
2429 3, 20 | or equal to itself. Hence Christ cannot be said to be the
2430 3, 20 | so God and ~man are one Christ," as Athanasius says (Symb.
2431 3, 20 | to his soul. Therefore, Christ is not said to ~be subject
2432 3, 20 | the Father is greater than Christ in human nature) ~"that
2433 3, 20 | OTC Para. 3/3~Further, Christ in His human nature is the
2434 3, 20 | belong to the Son. Therefore Christ is His own servant and is ~
2435 3, 20 | Hence when ~it is said that Christ is the master or servant
2436 3, 20 | is the Master of the Man Christ, this may be understood
2437 3, 20 | Father is the God or Lord of Christ, and does ~not rather confess
2438 3, 20 | must it be denied that Christ is less than Himself or
2439 3, 20 | mind that since this name "Christ" is the name ~of a Person,
2440 3, 20 | essentially and absolutely of Christ which belong to Him by reason
2441 3, 20 | qualification; so that we say that Christ is simply greatest, ~Lord,
2442 3, 20 | and Damascene deny that Christ is the head of Himself ~
2443 3, 21 | 21] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF CHRIST'S PRAYER (FOUR ARTICLES)~
2444 3, 21 | ARTICLES)~We must now consider Christ's prayer; and under this
2445 3, 21 | Whether it is becoming that Christ should pray?~(2) Whether
2446 3, 21 | Whether it is becoming of Christ to pray?~Aquin.: SMT TP
2447 3, 21 | would seem unbecoming that Christ should pray. For, as ~Damascene
2448 3, 21 | things from God." But since Christ could do all things, it
2449 3, 21 | does ~not seem fitting that Christ should pray.~Aquin.: SMT
2450 3, 21 | knows will not ~happen. But Christ in all things knew what
2451 3, 21 | of the mind to God." Now Christ's mind needed no uplifting ~
2452 3, 21 | it was not ~fitting that Christ should pray.~Aquin.: SMT
2453 3, 21 | had been but one will in Christ, viz. the Divine, it would
2454 3, 21 | human wills are ~distinct in Christ, and the human will of itself
2455 3, 21 | hence to pray ~belongs to Christ as man and as having a human
2456 3, 21 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Christ as God and not as man was
2457 3, 21 | 24), "the human mind of ~Christ did not need to rise to
2458 3, 21 | this sense the ~mind of Christ was always raised up to
2459 3, 21 | 1~Whether it pertains to Christ to pray according to His
2460 3, 21 | seem that it pertains to Christ to pray according to His ~
2461 3, 21 | 83:3) in the person of Christ: "My ~heart and My flesh
2462 3, 21 | appetite of the flesh. Hence Christ's sensuality could ascend ~
2463 3, 21 | desires what ~is besought. Now Christ besought something that
2464 3, 21 | pass from Me." Therefore ~Christ's sensuality prayed.~Aquin.:
2465 3, 21 | Therefore, neither did Christ pray ~according to His sensuality.~
2466 3, 21 | sensuality; and in ~this sense Christ did not pray with His sensuality,
2467 3, 21 | same nature and species in Christ as in us. Now in us the ~
2468 3, 21 | sensuality; and in this ~sense Christ prayed with His sensuality
2469 3, 21 | Enchiridion (Serm. 1 ~in Ps. 32): "Christ acting as a man, shows the
2470 3, 21 | Whether it was fitting that Christ should pray for Himself?~
2471 3, 21 | it was not fitting that Christ should pray for ~Himself.
2472 3, 21 | faith." Hence ~it seems that Christ prayed not for Himself but
2473 3, 21 | that He may fulfil ~it. Now Christ wished to suffer what He
2474 3, 21 | and thirsts. But He" (i.e. Christ) "did all these things,
2475 3, 21 | for ourselves alone." Now ~Christ did what He taught, according
2476 3, 21 | and ~to teach." Therefore Christ never prayed for Himself
2477 3, 21 | Para. 1/1~I answer that, Christ prayed for Himself in two
2478 3, 21 | said above (A[1], ad 1) Christ ~wished to pray to His Father
2479 3, 21 | much more the mere ~will of Christ has the force of a prayer
2480 3, 21 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Christ wished indeed to suffer
2481 3, 21 | 3: This very glory which Christ, while praying, besought
2482 3, 21 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether Christ's prayer was always heard?~
2483 3, 21 | OBJ 1: It would seem that Christ's prayer was not always
2484 3, 21 | 21:3) in the person of Christ: "I shall ~cry by day, and
2485 3, 21 | according to the will of reason, Christ willed nothing but what
2486 3, 21 | Wherefore every absolute will of Christ, even human, ~was fulfilled,
2487 3, 22 | 1 - OF THE PRIESTHOOD OF CHRIST (SIX ARTICLES)~We have now
2488 3, 22 | consider the Priesthood of Christ; and under this head ~there
2489 3, 22 | Whether it is fitting that Christ should be a priest?~(2)
2490 3, 22 | Whether it is fitting that Christ should be a priest?~Aquin.:
2491 3, 22 | would seem unfitting that Christ should be a priest. For
2492 3, 22 | angel of the Lord." But ~Christ is greater than the angels,
2493 3, 22 | Therefore it is unfitting that Christ should be a priest.~Aquin.:
2494 3, 22 | Testament were figures of ~Christ, according to Col. 2:17: "
2495 3, 22 | to come, ~but the body is Christ's." But Christ was not descended
2496 3, 22 | the body is Christ's." But Christ was not descended from the
2497 3, 22 | Therefore it is not fitting that Christ should be a priest.~Aquin.:
2498 3, 22 | Law, which is a figure of Christ, the ~lawgivers and the
2499 3, 22 | the priest's office." But ~Christ is the giver of the New
2500 3, 22 | Therefore it is unfitting that Christ should be ~a priest.~Aquin.:
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-7000 | 7001-7500 | 7501-7588 |