1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-6754
Part, Question
4501 3, 2 | Nestorius held that the human nature was assumed by the ~Word
4502 3, 2 | Damascene held that the human nature in Christ is an instrument ~
4503 3, 2 | the union of the Divine nature and the human is anything
4504 3, 2 | Himself is ~united to human nature. Therefore it seems that
4505 3, 2 | the Divine and the human nature, inasmuch as they come ~
4506 3, 2 | thinking; but in the human nature, which is a ~creature, it
4507 3, 2 | Reply OBJ 2: The specific nature of a relation, as of motion,
4508 3, 2 | nowhere save in a created ~nature, as was said above, it follows
4509 3, 2 | the contrary, The Divine Nature is said to be united, not
4510 3, 2 | relation of the Divine Nature and the human, according
4511 3, 2 | assumed. For the ~human nature is taken to be in the terminus
4512 3, 2 | of God, Who assumes human nature unto Himself, is man. But
4513 3, 2 | Himself, is man. But human nature, ~considered in itself,
4514 3, 2 | the Son of God is human nature. From this same follows
4515 3, 2 | indifferently that the human nature is united with the Divine,
4516 3, 2 | conversely. But the Divine Nature is not said to be assumed
4517 3, 2 | conversely, because the human nature is joined to the Divine ~
4518 3, 2 | Person subsists in human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[2] A[8]
4519 3, 2 | Father united the human nature to the Son, but not to Himself;
4520 3, 2 | identical, for the Divine Nature is said to be ~united, but
4521 3, 2 | which is ~flesh or human nature. And thus assumption differs
4522 3, 2 | what is one in person and nature; whereas ~from the union
4523 3, 2 | of the Divine and human nature there results what is one ~
4524 3, 2 | whatever ~pertains to the nature of unity; and therefore
4525 3, 2 | not compatible with ~the nature of a part, as in numerical
4526 3, 2 | not by reason of the human nature, ~which is not the unity
4527 3, 2 | the unity of ~person and nature in us; and hence the union
4528 3, 2 | Augustine that the human nature is not more in the Son of ~
4529 3, 2 | But the union of the human nature to the Divine did not take
4530 3, 2 | by union with the Divine Nature. Therefore this union was
4531 3, 2 | free gift of God. Now human nature stands in need of the ~gratuitous
4532 3, 2 | capability. Moreover, human nature is lifted up to God ~in
4533 3, 2 | to Christ, ~in Whom human nature is assumed so as to be in
4534 3, 2 | a habit, whereas that a nature has being in its own ~suppositum
4535 3, 2 | the fact that the human nature is ~united to the Divine
4536 3, 2 | by the Incarnation human nature is not ~said to have participated
4537 3, 2 | a likeness of the Divine nature, but is said to ~be united
4538 3, 2 | be united to the Divine Nature itself in the Person of
4539 3, 2 | belongs to the ~whole human nature, which is composed of soul
4540 3, 2 | Christ because ~the Divine Nature is united not merely to
4541 3, 2 | reformation ~of the entire human nature, and therefore it does not
4542 3, 2 | of the good of the entire nature. Yet the holy Fathers merited ~
4543 3, 2 | and grace and the ~very nature of man. And again, the mystery
4544 3, 2 | did not take place in the ~nature, but in the Person, as was
4545 3, 2 | grace is divided against nature, even as gratuitous ~things,
4546 3, 2 | that which is according to nature. But the ~grace of union
4547 3, 2 | in regard to the Divine Nature, ~otherwise it would belong
4548 3, 2 | according to the human nature, otherwise it would belong
4549 3, 2 | since they are of the same nature as He. Therefore it would
4550 3, 2 | the assumption of ~human nature, grace itself became somewhat
4551 3, 2 | Philosopher (Metaph. v, 5), nature ~designates, in one way,
4552 3, 2 | to Eph. 2:3: "We were by nature children of wrath"; and
4553 3, 2 | principles of the human nature of ~Christ, although it
4554 3, 2 | if coming to the human ~nature of Christ by the causality
4555 3, 2 | causality of His Divine Nature. But these two ~kinds of
4556 3, 2 | His conception the human ~nature was united to the Divine
4557 3, 2 | did not take place in the nature, yet it ~was caused by the
4558 3, 2 | the power of the Divine Nature, which is truly the nature ~
4559 3, 2 | Nature, which is truly the nature ~of Christ, and it, moreover,
4560 3, 2 | the power of the Divine Nature it ~was in the humanity
4561 3, 2 | according to ~His human nature, as if it were caused by
4562 3, 2 | principles of the human ~nature, and hence it need not belong
4563 3, 2 | Him in regard to the human nature on account of the "property" ~
4564 3, 2 | in ~regard to the Divine Nature, inasmuch as the Divine
4565 3, 2 | inasmuch as the Divine Nature is the active ~principle
4566 3, 3 | befitting to the Divine Nature?~(3) Whether the Nature
4567 3, 3 | Nature?~(3) Whether the Nature abstracted from the Personality
4568 3, 3 | can assume one individual nature?~(7) Whether one Person
4569 3, 3 | of God to ~assume human nature than for another Divine
4570 3, 3 | Person to ~assume a created nature. For a Divine Person signifies
4571 3, 3 | Person to assume a created nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[1]
4572 3, 3 | dignity. But it is of the nature of a person to ~be incommunicable,
4573 3, 3 | person is constituted by nature. But it is repugnant ~that
4574 3, 3 | to a Person ~to assume a nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[1]
4575 3, 3 | took the form," i.e. the nature, ~"of a servant to His own
4576 3, 3 | to take, i.e. to assume a nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[1]
4577 3, 3 | the Person, and not in the nature. Hence it ~is plain that
4578 3, 3 | is plain that to assume a nature is most properly befitting
4579 3, 3 | is not contrary to the ~nature of person to be communicated
4580 3, 3 | Q[2], A[1]), the human nature ~constitutes a Divine Person,
4581 3, 3 | denominated from such a nature. For human nature does not
4582 3, 3 | such a nature. For human nature does not make the Son of ~
4583 3, 3 | man. It is ~by the Divine Nature that a Divine Person is
4584 3, 3 | said to assume the Divine Nature, but to assume ~the human
4585 3, 3 | but to assume ~the human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[2]
4586 3, 3 | befitting to the Divine Nature to assume?~Aquin.: SMT TP
4587 3, 3 | befitting to the Divine Nature to ~assume. Because, as
4588 3, 3 | oneself. But the Divine Nature did not take to Itself human
4589 3, 3 | not take to Itself human nature, for ~the union did not
4590 3, 3 | did not take place in the nature, as was said above (Q[2], ~
4591 3, 3 | befitting to the Divine Nature to assume human ~nature.~
4592 3, 3 | Nature to assume human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[2]
4593 3, 3 | OBJ 2: Further, the Divine Nature is common to the three Persons.
4594 3, 3 | befitting to the Divine Nature to assume, it ~consequently
4595 3, 3 | the Father ~assumed human nature even as the Son, which is
4596 3, 3 | befits a person, not a ~nature, which is rather taken to
4597 3, 3 | is not befitting to the nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[2]
4598 3, 3 | Fide ad Petrum ii): ~"That nature which remains eternally
4599 3, 3 | eternal generation) "took our nature free ~of sin from His Mother."~
4600 3, 3 | assumption belongs to the Divine Nature in ~itself, because the
4601 3, 3 | not belong to the Divine Nature in itself, ~but by reason
4602 3, 3 | said ~secondarily that the Nature assumed a nature to Its
4603 3, 3 | that the Nature assumed a nature to Its Person. And after
4604 3, 3 | after the ~same manner the Nature is also said to be incarnate,
4605 3, 3 | but that it assumed the nature of flesh. Hence ~Damascene
4606 3, 3 | and Cyril we say that the Nature of God is incarnate."~Aquin.:
4607 3, 3 | suppositum. ~But the Divine Nature is not a distinct suppositum
4608 3, 3 | inasmuch as the Divine Nature took human nature to the ~
4609 3, 3 | Divine Nature took human nature to the ~Person of the Word,
4610 3, 3 | the ~Father takes human nature to the Person of the Word,
4611 3, 3 | the Father assumes human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[2]
4612 3, 3 | befitting to the Divine Nature in Itself is ~befitting
4613 3, 3 | being. Hence the Divine Nature is ~both that whereby God
4614 3, 3 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Nature abstracted from the Personality
4615 3, 3 | Personality by our mind, ~the Nature cannot assume. For it was
4616 3, 3 | that it belongs to ~the Nature to assume by reason of the
4617 3, 3 | mentally abstracted, the Nature cannot assume.~Aquin.: SMT
4618 3, 3 | cannot take place in the nature, but only in the ~Person.
4619 3, 3 | be abstracted, the Divine Nature ~cannot assume.~Aquin.:
4620 3, 3 | abstracted, ~the Divine Nature cannot assume.~Aquin.: SMT
4621 3, 3 | be ~removed, the Divine Nature can still assume.~Aquin.:
4622 3, 3 | may still ~understand the Nature assuming.~Aquin.: SMT TP
4623 3, 3 | since it is an ~intellectual nature. Hence just as we now say
4624 3, 3 | our thought the Divine ~Nature as subsisting and as a Person.
4625 3, 3 | understood to assume human nature by reason of Its subsistence
4626 3, 3 | another can assume a created nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[4]
4627 3, 3 | cannot assume a created nature ~without another assuming
4628 3, 3 | incarnate, so ~also did the Nature; for "the whole Divine Nature
4629 3, 3 | Nature; for "the whole Divine Nature became incarnate in one ~
4630 3, 3 | Orth. iii, 6). But the ~Nature is common to the three Persons.
4631 3, 3 | 3: Further, as the human nature in Christ is assumed by
4632 3, 3 | but what pertains to the nature of term belongs to one ~
4633 3, 3 | Persons caused the human nature to be united to the one
4634 3, 3 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The Nature is said to be incarnate,
4635 3, 3 | Now "the whole Divine ~Nature is" said to be "incarnate";
4636 3, 3 | perfection of the ~Divine Nature of the Person incarnate,
4637 3, 3 | participation of the Divine Nature, by an ~assimilation to
4638 3, 3 | partakers of the Divine Nature"; and hence this assumption
4639 3, 3 | could have assumed human nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[5]
4640 3, 3 | could have assumed ~human nature except the Person of the
4641 3, 3 | Persons. Moreover, the nature of Personality is common
4642 3, 3 | could have united human nature to the Person of the Father
4643 3, 3 | would not suffice for the nature ~of mission.~Aquin.: SMT
4644 3, 3 | and the same individual ~nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[6]
4645 3, 3 | and the ~same individual nature. For, this being granted,
4646 3, 3 | for just as one Divine Nature in ~several Persons does
4647 3, 3 | several gods, so one human nature in ~several persons does
4648 3, 3 | Persons can take one human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[6]
4649 3, 3 | cannot assume one human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[6]
4650 3, 3 | were to assume one human ~nature, it would follow that whatever
4651 3, 3 | should assume one human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[6]
4652 3, 3 | can subsist in one Divine Nature. Therefore they can also ~
4653 3, 3 | also ~subsist in one human nature in such a way that the human
4654 3, 3 | such a way that the human nature be ~assumed by the three
4655 3, 3 | hypostasis, but one human nature is assumed to the Divine
4656 3, 3 | the power of the human ~nature, but by the power of the
4657 3, 3 | communicating in the same nature, but only in the same Person. ~
4658 3, 3 | the quality of the human nature ~assumed. Therefore it is
4659 3, 3 | should assume one human nature, but it would be impossible
4660 3, 3 | Persons assume one human ~nature, it would be true to say
4661 3, 3 | because of the one human nature. For just as it is now true
4662 3, 3 | account of the one Divine Nature, so it ~would be true to
4663 3, 3 | account of the one human nature. ~Nor would "one" imply
4664 3, 3 | person, but unity in human nature; for it ~could not be argued
4665 3, 3 | the spirit of man are by nature different, ~but by inherence
4666 3, 3 | this supposition the human nature would be assumed to ~the
4667 3, 3 | that even as the Divine Nature has a natural unity with
4668 3, 3 | Person, so ~also the human nature would have a unity with
4669 3, 3 | properties belonging to the nature, because whatever ~belongs
4670 3, 3 | whatever ~belongs to the nature can be predicated of the
4671 3, 3 | Person subsisting in that ~nature, no matter to which of the
4672 3, 3 | what belongs to ~the human nature and what belongs to the
4673 3, 3 | human ~natures. For the nature assumed in the mystery of
4674 3, 3 | contradiction, for the nature of one species is only multiplied
4675 3, 3 | would not have one human ~nature; neither could it be said
4676 3, 3 | Incarnation the whole Divine ~Nature is united to the whole nature
4677 3, 3 | Nature is united to the whole nature assumed, i.e. to every part
4678 3, 3 | can still assume a human nature ~distinct from that which
4679 3, 3 | can assume another ~human nature distinct from the one He
4680 3, 3 | Person so assumed one human nature as to be unable to assume
4681 3, 3 | Personality of the Divine ~Nature was so comprehended by one
4682 3, 3 | comprehended by one human nature as to be unable to assume ~
4683 3, 3 | over and ~beyond the human nature which He has assumed, can
4684 3, 3 | another distinct ~human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[7]
4685 3, 3 | 1~Reply OBJ 1: A created nature is completed in its essentials
4686 3, 3 | consequence is that the nature is multiplied by the multiplication
4687 3, 3 | multitude on the ~part of the nature, on account of the division
4688 3, 3 | on ~account of the one nature assumed, as was said above (
4689 3, 3 | qualities." Now the assumed nature is, as it were, a ~garment,
4690 3, 3 | assume one singular human nature, they would be said to be
4691 3, 3 | Divine Person, but the Divine Nature is related first of all ~
4692 3, 3 | and afterwards the ~human nature is related to the Divine
4693 3, 3 | time, not indeed that the nature is the Person, ~but that
4694 3, 3 | of God subsists in human nature. For the Son of God ~is
4695 3, 3 | in order that the ~human nature may be assumed by the Divine
4696 3, 3 | Divine Person, the Divine Nature must ~be united by a personal
4697 3, 3 | personal union with the whole nature assumed, i.e. in all ~its
4698 3, 3 | Person should assume human nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[8]
4699 3, 3 | of the Son in His human nature, as Arius, who held an inequality ~
4700 3, 3 | second creation of human nature, according to Gal. 6:15: "
4701 3, 3 | particular agreement with human nature, since the Word ~is a concept
4702 3, 3 | personally united to human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[8]
4703 3, 3 | not able to restore human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[8]
4704 3, 4 | ON THE PART OF THE HUMAN NATURE (SIX ARTICLES)~We must now
4705 3, 4 | Son of God assumed human nature and its parts. Hence a threefold ~
4706 3, 4 | First, with regard to the nature; secondly, with ~regard
4707 3, 4 | inquiry:~(1) Whether human nature was more capable of being
4708 3, 4 | assumed than any ~other nature?~(2) Whether He assumed
4709 3, 4 | that He should assume human nature ~abstracted from all individuals? ~(
4710 3, 4 | that He should assume human nature in all ~its individuals?~(
4711 3, 4 | that He should assume human nature in any ~man begotten of
4712 3, 4 | Para. 1/1~Whether human nature was more assumable by the
4713 3, 4 | Son of God than any other ~nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[1]
4714 3, 4 | It would seem that human nature is not more capable of being ~
4715 3, 4 | Son of God than any other nature. For Augustine says (Ep. ~
4716 3, 4 | is not limited to one ~nature, since the power of God
4717 3, 4 | infinite. Therefore human nature is not ~more capable of
4718 3, 4 | capable of assumption as human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[1]
4719 3, 4 | Further, in the angelic nature we find a more perfect likeness ~
4720 3, 4 | likeness ~than in human nature, as Gregory says: (Hom.
4721 3, 4 | Therefore the angelic ~nature was as capable of assumption
4722 3, 4 | capable of assumption as the nature of man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
4723 3, 4 | amongst which is human nature. Therefore the ~whole universe
4724 3, 4 | being assumed than human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[1]
4725 3, 4 | the Son of God with human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[1]
4726 3, 4 | Now this fitness in human ~nature may be taken from two things,
4727 3, 4 | its dignity, because human nature, as ~being rational and
4728 3, 4 | two things belong to human nature alone. ~For in the irrational
4729 3, 4 | wanting, and in ~the angelic nature the aforesaid fitness of
4730 3, 4 | follows that only human nature was assumable.~Aquin.: SMT
4731 3, 4 | image is found in human nature, forasmuch ~as it is capable
4732 3, 4 | incorruptibility of ~their nature nor the goodness of the
4733 3, 4 | the fitness of the angelic nature for being ~assumed. For
4734 3, 4 | producing a new angelic nature could join it to ~Himself
4735 3, 4 | because, although the angelic nature in some is the subject of
4736 3, 4 | follows that only human nature is capable of being assumed.~
4737 3, 4 | Son of God "assumed human nature ~'in atomo,'" i.e. in an
4738 3, 4 | an individual in rational nature ~is a person, as is plain
4739 3, 4 | what He had sown in our nature." But He sowed our ~personality
4740 3, 4 | that "God assumed the nature, not the person, of man."~
4741 3, 4 | Now a ~person in human nature is not presupposed to assumption;
4742 3, 4 | Son of God assumed human nature "in atomo," i.e. in an ~
4743 3, 4 | personality is not wanting to the nature assumed ~through the loss
4744 3, 4 | perfection of the human ~nature but through the addition
4745 3, 4 | something which is above human nature, ~viz. the union with a
4746 3, 4 | been. For if ~the human nature had not been assumed by
4747 3, 4 | Divine Person, the human ~nature would have had its own personality;
4748 3, 4 | union hindered the human nature from having its ~personality.~
4749 3, 4 | man" signifies a human nature. But the Son of ~God assumed
4750 3, 4 | of ~God assumed a human nature. Therefore He assumed a
4751 3, 4 | individual to Whom the human nature is ~assumed is none other
4752 3, 4 | word "man" signifies human nature, as it is in a ~suppositum,
4753 3, 4 | signifies Him Who has human nature. And hence it cannot properly ~
4754 3, 4 | assumed, inasmuch as his nature was assumed; and ~because
4755 3, 4 | word "man" signifies human nature in the concrete, ~inasmuch
4756 3, 4 | assumed, but the man ~whose nature He assumed.~Aquin.: SMT
4757 3, 4 | ought to have assumed human nature abstracted from ~all individuals?~
4758 3, 4 | ought to have assumed human ~nature abstracted from all individuals.
4759 3, 4 | the assumption of human ~nature took place for the common
4760 3, 4 | especially of ~the faithful." But nature as it is in individuals
4761 3, 4 | ought to have assumed human nature ~as it is abstracted from
4762 3, 4 | to ~Platonists, is human nature abstracted from its individuals.
4763 3, 4 | 1~OBJ 3: Further, human nature was not assumed by the Son
4764 3, 4 | this way it signifies human nature as it is in individuals,
4765 3, 4 | Son of God assumed ~human nature as it is separated from
4766 3, 4 | Incarnate did not assume a nature which exists in pure thought;
4767 3, 4 | Incarnation." ~But human nature as it is separated or abstracted
4768 3, 4 | God did not ~assume human nature, as it is separated from
4769 3, 4 | 1/2~I answer that, The nature of man or of any other sensible
4770 3, 4 | belongs to the specific nature of ~sensible things, and
4771 3, 4 | definition of man. Hence human nature cannot be without sensible ~
4772 3, 4 | Nevertheless, if human nature were subsistent in this
4773 3, 4 | and it is contrary to ~the nature of a common form to be thus
4774 3, 4 | Secondly, because to a common nature can only be attributed common
4775 3, 4 | God, having assumed our nature, might merit for us. Thirdly,
4776 3, 4 | us. Thirdly, because a ~nature so existing would not be
4777 3, 4 | Son ~of God assumed human nature in order to show Himself
4778 3, 4 | Likewise, neither could human nature have been assumed by the
4779 3, 4 | none other than ~the Divine Nature; and, according to this,
4780 3, 4 | according to this, human nature would be in the ~Son of
4781 3, 4 | Son of God assumed ~human nature as it is in a human intellect,
4782 3, 4 | understood to assume a human nature; and thus if He ~did not
4783 3, 4 | assumption of the human nature be anything but a fictitious ~
4784 3, 4 | as is attributed to the nature ~separated from the individuals,
4785 3, 4 | man is not to be found in nature in ~such a way as to be
4786 3, 4 | Reply OBJ 3: Although human nature was not assumed in the concrete,
4787 3, 4 | ought to have assumed human nature in all ~individuals?~Aquin.:
4788 3, 4 | ought to have assumed human ~nature in all individuals. For
4789 3, 4 | and by itself is ~human nature. But what belongs essentially
4790 3, 4 | belongs essentially to a nature belongs to all who ~exist
4791 3, 4 | to all who ~exist in the nature. Therefore it was fitting
4792 3, 4 | it was fitting that human nature should be ~assumed by the
4793 3, 4 | Son of God to assume human nature in all its ~supposita.~Aquin.:
4794 3, 4 | 2:10). Therefore ~human nature ought to have been assumed
4795 3, 4 | God "did not assume human nature as a species, nor did He
4796 3, 4 | was unfitting for human nature to be assumed by the ~Word
4797 3, 4 | multitude of supposita of ~human nature, which are natural to it,
4798 3, 4 | suppositum in the assumed nature, except ~the Person assuming,
4799 3, 4 | if there was no human ~nature except what was assumed,
4800 3, 4 | one ~suppositum of human nature, which is the Person assuming.
4801 3, 4 | according to the ~human nature, even as He is the First-born
4802 3, 4 | should ~assume one human nature, so that on both sides unity
4803 3, 4 | assumed belongs to the human nature of itself, ~because it does
4804 3, 4 | it belongs to ~the Divine Nature to assume by reason of the
4805 3, 4 | the ~assumption of human nature, but especially in what
4806 3, 4 | what He suffered in human ~nature for other men, according
4807 3, 4 | place had He assumed human nature in ~all its supposita.~Aquin.:
4808 3, 4 | Son of God to assume human nature of the ~stock of Adam?~Aquin.:
4809 3, 4 | of God to ~assume human nature of the stock of Adam, for
4810 3, 4 | had He not assumed human nature of the stock of Adam, a ~
4811 3, 4 | not to have assumed human nature of ~the stock of Adam.~Aquin.:
4812 3, 4 | He wished to assume human nature, He ought to ~have assumed
4813 3, 4 | on Gal. 2:15: "For we by nature are Jews, and not of the ~
4814 3, 4 | He wished to assume human nature from ~sinners, He ought
4815 3, 4 | was able to ~assume human nature elsewhere than from the
4816 3, 4 | better to assume ~human nature from the vanquished race,
4817 3, 4 | and hence ~that from the nature which he had corrupted should
4818 3, 4 | to be made for the whole nature. Secondly, it ~pertains
4819 3, 4 | a corrupt and weakened ~nature, He assumed that which was
4820 3, 4 | overthrow, and not as regards nature which He came to ~save,
4821 3, 4 | mass tainted by ~sin, His nature was endowed with such purity.~
4822 3, 4 | that He should assume human nature in Adam himself.~Aquin.:
4823 3, 5 | OF THE PARTS OF HUMAN NATURE WHICH WERE ASSUMED (FOUR
4824 3, 5 | assumption of the parts of human nature; and ~under this head there
4825 3, 5 | did not absorb the lesser nature, nor did the assumption ~
4826 3, 5 | from the essence of human ~nature to which it pertains to
4827 3, 5 | of God to ~assume human nature, He must consequently have
4828 3, 5 | indicates the truth of the human nature in ~Christ - just as all
4829 3, 5 | that truly exist in human nature are said to be like ~in
4830 3, 5 | body to the unity of the nature, which is ~impossible, as
4831 3, 5 | as the truth of the human nature of Christ ~would not have
4832 3, 5 | First, as regards His Divine Nature; not indeed that the Divine
4833 3, 5 | not indeed that the Divine Nature ~ceased to be in heaven,
4834 3, 5 | way, viz. by His assumed. nature, according to Jn. 3:13: "
4835 3, 5 | was present. But "God and nature do ~nothing uselessly,"
4836 3, 5 | constituted the common ~nature, which is the human species.
4837 3, 5 | soul and body one human ~nature is constituted. But this
4838 3, 5 | that in ~Christ there was a nature which was constituted by
4839 3, 5 | the assumption of human nature by the Word of God is ~called
4840 3, 6 | Whether the whole human nature was assumed through the
4841 3, 6 | God is united to ~human nature and its parts, is more perfect
4842 3, 6 | of time; the other, of nature. But in the mystery of ~
4843 3, 6 | God united the whole human nature to Himself at the same ~
4844 3, 6 | 30], A[3]). An order of nature between things may ~be taken
4845 3, 6 | Q[4], A[1]) that human nature was assumable before ~all
4846 3, 6 | the assumption of human nature by the Word of God, Who
4847 3, 6 | constituted ~simply by human nature, it would follow that the
4848 3, 6 | would be nearer the human nature. But ~because the hypostasis
4849 3, 6 | exalted than the ~human nature, the more exalted any part
4850 3, 6 | exalted any part of the human nature is, the ~nearer it is to
4851 3, 6 | this way that it has the nature of a medium.~Aquin.: SMT
4852 3, 6 | seem to ~be of the same nature as ours, which are created
4853 3, 6 | flesh was not of a different nature to ours, nor was a ~different
4854 3, 6 | the Word, in the order of ~nature; but it does not follow
4855 3, 6 | soul is a part of human nature, so is the body. ~But the
4856 3, 6 | inasmuch as it is against the nature of the soul to be ~before
4857 3, 6 | it would be against ~the nature of a form to exist before
4858 3, 6 | exist before the specific nature. And therefore ~the dissimilarity
4859 3, 6 | precedes the perfection of the nature, viz. that we are ~conceived
4860 3, 6 | bespeak a ~diversity of nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[6] A[4]
4861 3, 6 | before," not in time, but in ~nature; for the flesh is understood
4862 3, 6 | found only in the rational nature~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[6] A[5]
4863 3, 6 | Whether the whole human nature was assumed through the
4864 3, 6 | assumed the whole human nature ~through the medium of its
4865 3, 6 | But the parts of ~human nature, since they are simpler
4866 3, 6 | to constitute the human nature of the Word. But it is order
4867 3, 6 | Word. But it is order of nature ~that is signified. Hence
4868 3, 6 | Hence by what is prior in nature, that is assumed ~which
4869 3, 6 | assumed ~which is posterior in nature. Now a thing is prior in
4870 3, 6 | Now a thing is prior in nature in two ways: ~First on the
4871 3, 6 | assumed the parts ~of human nature, through the medium of the
4872 3, 6 | their relation to human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[6] A[5]
4873 3, 6 | assuming the parts of human nature, assumed the whole human ~
4874 3, 6 | assumed the whole human ~nature. And thus the assumption
4875 3, 6 | whereas the assumption of the nature is prior if we consider
4876 3, 6 | terminated, not a union of nature, which springs from a conjunction
4877 3, 6 | Para. 1/1~Whether the human nature was assumed through the
4878 3, 6 | Son of God assumed human nature through ~the medium of grace.
4879 3, 6 | united to God. But the human ~nature in Christ was most closely
4880 3, 6 | by grace. But the human nature was fitted for the ~assumption
4881 3, 6 | union of the Word with human nature took ~place in the subsistence,
4882 3, 6 | 6]). Therefore the human nature was not assumed by means
4883 3, 6 | assumption ~of the human nature, whether we speak of the
4884 3, 6 | from above to the human nature in the Person of the Word, ~
4885 3, 6 | the union of the human ~nature with the Word of God is
4886 3, 6 | on ~any habit, but on the nature itself.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
4887 3, 7 | the Son of God in ~human nature; and first what belongs
4888 3, 7 | partakers of the ~Divine Nature." Now Christ is God not
4889 3, 7 | well. Therefore His human nature needed no further grace ~
4890 3, 7 | principal agent. Now ~the human nature in Christ was "as the instrument
4891 3, 7 | is ~necessary for human nature to be raised by grace. Thirdly,
4892 3, 7 | God in Divine Person and Nature. Yet ~because together with
4893 3, 7 | as to act. And hence the nature of the action demanded ~
4894 3, 7 | in ~Him, since in their nature they imply no defect with
4895 3, 7 | answer that, As it is of the nature of faith that one assents
4896 3, 7 | sees not, so is it of the nature of hope that one expects
4897 3, 7 | perfect in the order of its nature needs to be ~helped by something
4898 3, 7 | by something of a higher nature; as man, however perfect,
4899 3, 7 | never ~quitted the human nature of Christ, from Whose Divine
4900 3, 7 | Christ, from Whose Divine nature He ~proceedeth."~Aquin.:
4901 3, 7 | since it pertains to the ~nature of virtue to render acts
4902 3, 7 | Ethic. ii, 6. And hence ~the nature of the gift of fear regards
4903 3, 7 | pertains to Him in His human nature to have grace.~Aquin.: SMT
4904 3, 7 | and vision, belongs to the nature of prophecy; but the ~comparison
4905 3, 7 | bestowed gratis on the human nature; and it ~is clear that this
4906 3, 7 | viewed in its specific ~nature of grace; and thus the grace
4907 3, 7 | whatsoever can pertain to the nature ~of grace, and what pertains
4908 3, 7 | and what pertains to the nature of grace is not bestowed
4909 3, 7 | bestowing grace on human nature, according to ~Eph. 1:5,
4910 3, 7 | indeed in being, but in the ~nature of light, as having whatever
4911 3, 7 | whatever can pertain to the nature of light.~Aquin.: SMT TP
4912 3, 7 | the Son, viz. the Divine Nature, which is an infinite ~gift.
4913 3, 7 | which ~is given the human nature, to be united to the Divine
4914 3, 7 | full and perfect to ~human nature." Thirdly, it may be referred
4915 3, 7 | heat which can exist in the nature of air, although there ~
4916 3, 7 | which this form can have by nature, ~e.g. if we say the heat
4917 3, 7 | a disposition in ~human nature for the personal union.
4918 3, 7 | the ~assumption of human nature to the unity of the Person
4919 3, 7 | The union of the human nature with the Divine Person, ~
4920 3, 7 | in order of time, but ~by nature and in thought; and this
4921 3, 7 | of the Son assuming human nature, Who is said to ~be sent
4922 3, 7 | inasmuch as He assumed human nature; but the ~principle of habitual
4923 3, 7 | is prior, in the order of nature, to ~the mission of the
4924 3, 7 | even as in the order of nature the Holy ~Ghost proceeds
4925 3, 7 | is prior in ~the order of nature to habitual grace, according
4926 3, 7 | is by the union of human ~nature with the Divine Person.
4927 3, 7 | not ~exist in the human nature before the union, as is
4928 3, 7 | existing fire. Now the human ~nature in Christ is united to the
4929 3, 8 | the Head in His visible ~nature in which man is set over
4930 3, 8 | head and members are of one nature. But Christ as man is not
4931 3, 8 | man is not of ~the same nature with the angels, but only
4932 3, 8 | agree with angels in generic nature, though not in ~specific
4933 3, 8 | though not in ~specific nature. By reason of this agreement
4934 3, 8 | virtue of the ~spiritual nature, i.e. the Divine, can cause
4935 3, 8 | and this belongs to the nature of head. Hence the personal ~
4936 3, 8 | Adam, which is a sin of the nature, is ~derived from his actual
4937 3, 8 | the ~person corrupted the nature; and by means of this corruption
4938 3, 8 | inasmuch as the corrupt nature ~corrupts the person. Now
4939 3, 8 | vouchsafed us by means of human ~nature, but solely by the personal
4940 3, 8 | one corresponding to the ~nature, the other to the person
4941 3, 8 | distinguish the sin of the ~nature and of the person.~Aquin.:
4942 3, 8 | aversion ~from God has the nature of an end, inasmuch as it
4943 3, 9 | the union of the human nature with the Divine took place ~
4944 3, 9 | the ~perfection of human nature in the flesh; He took upon
4945 3, 9 | assumed an entire ~human nature, i.e. not only a body, but
4946 3, 9 | imperfect, but a ~perfect human nature, since the whole human race
4947 3, 9 | knowledge pertains to the nature of the ~human soul, viz.
4948 3, 9 | He took the whole human ~nature, as stated above (Q[5]).
4949 3, 9 | that it belongs to another nature. Therefore, if there had
4950 3, 9 | Divine and as to His human nature; so ~that, by reason of
4951 3, 9 | person only by reason of a ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[9] A[2]
4952 3, 9 | double knowledge - one by nature, one ~above nature. Now
4953 3, 9 | one by nature, one ~above nature. Now the knowledge of the
4954 3, 9 | natural to man, but above his nature. But in Christ ~there was
4955 3, 9 | Person, ~not in essence or nature; yet with the unity of Person
4956 3, 9 | which is a part ~of human nature, through a light participated
4957 3, 9 | participated from the Divine Nature, is ~perfected with the
4958 3, 9 | there should be in the human nature of ~Christ a created beatitude,
4959 3, 9 | in the last ~end of human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[9] A[2]
4960 3, 9 | to some extent above ~the nature of the rational soul, inasmuch
4961 3, 9 | is in accordance with its nature, ~inasmuch as it is capable
4962 3, 9 | as it is capable of it by nature, having been made to the ~
4963 3, 9 | in every ~way above the nature of the human soul.~Aquin.:
4964 3, 9 | fitting that the human ~nature assumed by the Word of God
4965 3, 9 | things in their proper ~nature by intelligible species
4966 3, 9 | species, proportioned to its nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[9] A[4]
4967 3, 9 | that God planted in our ~nature was wanting to the human
4968 3, 9 | was wanting to the human nature assumed by the Word of God.
4969 3, 9 | that God planted in human nature not only a passive, but
4970 3, 9 | in ~other things God and nature make nothing in vain, as
4971 3, 9 | proportioned to ~the angelic nature. But the beatific knowledge,
4972 3, 9 | knowledge is of a different nature, as ~coming down to the
4973 3, 10 | Person is united to the human nature in Christ." ~Therefore much
4974 3, 10 | more is the whole Divine Nature seen by the soul of ~Christ;
4975 3, 10 | Further, what belongs by nature to the Son of God belongs
4976 3, 10 | Divine Essence belongs by nature to the Son of God. ~Therefore
4977 3, 10 | personal being does the human ~nature comprehend the Word of God
4978 3, 10 | Word of God or the Divine Nature, for although it ~was wholly
4979 3, 10 | wholly united to the human nature in the one Person of the
4980 3, 10 | circumscribed by the human nature. ~Hence Augustine says (
4981 3, 10 | Son of God in His ~Divine Nature is also said of the Son
4982 3, 10 | soul, but in His ~Divine Nature; even as we may also say
4983 3, 10 | not merely in the Divine Nature, but also ~in the human,
4984 3, 10 | limited to one specific nature. But what is ~simply infinite
4985 3, 10 | universal - for example, the nature of a ~genus or species,
4986 3, 10 | supreme, than on the order of nature, in which the angelic nature
4987 3, 10 | nature, in which the angelic nature is ~placed before the human.~
4988 3, 11 | Christ's soul is of the same nature as ours. otherwise ~He would
4989 3, 11 | of Christ was of the same nature as our ~souls, yet it had
4990 3, 11 | human soul in the order of nature is below the angelic nature. ~
4991 3, 11 | nature is below the angelic nature. ~Therefore since the knowledge
4992 3, 11 | knowledge by which the angelic nature is perfected.~Aquin.: SMT
4993 3, 11 | pertains to the angelic nature. But as regards the ~second,
4994 3, 11 | exceeding the mode of human nature, as by ~it He saw the Essence
4995 3, 11 | manner proportioned to human nature, i.e. inasmuch as He ~knew
4996 3, 12 | and in comparison to the ~nature; hence it could increase.~
4997 3, 12 | proving the truth of His human nature. Hence Bede ~says (on Lk.
4998 3, 13 | distinction of natures, each nature still retaining ~what belonged
4999 3, 13 | form is either the very ~nature of the thing, as in simple
5000 3, 13 | the constituent of the ~nature of the thing; as in such
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-4000 | 4001-4500 | 4501-5000 | 5001-5500 | 5501-6000 | 6001-6500 | 6501-6754 |