Part, Question

5001   3, 13  |               to say, from the Divine ~Nature. For since the Divine Nature
5002   3, 13  |           Nature. For since the Divine Nature is the very uncircumscribed
5003   3, 13  |           everything that can have the nature of being; and this is to
5004   3, 13  |               as the perfection of its nature extends to; as what is hot
5005   3, 13  |              Christ is a part of human nature, it ~cannot possibly have
5006   3, 13  |              power flows from the very nature of the ~thing, inasmuch
5007   3, 13  |              is received in the ~lower nature from the higher is possessed
5008   3, 13  |               Christ is of an inferior nature to the ~Divine Nature, the
5009   3, 13  |         inferior nature to the ~Divine Nature, the similitudes of things
5010   3, 13  |        strength they had in the Divine Nature. And ~hence it is that the
5011   3, 13  |                  which pertains to the nature of omnipotence; and, amongst
5012   3, 13  |             wonted order and course of nature, as to raise the dead; the
5013   3, 13  |              ways: first in its proper nature and with its power of nature ~
5014   3, 13  |           nature and with its power of nature ~or of grace; secondly,
5015   3, 13  |               of Christ in ~its proper nature and with its power of nature
5016   3, 13  |           nature and with its power of nature or of grace, it had power ~
5017   3, 13  |            Word, but not in its proper nature and power, since some of
5018   3, 13  |                neither in the order of nature nor in ~the order of grace.~
5019   3, 13  |                1~OBJ 2: Further, human nature was more perfect in Christ
5020   3, 13  |              to the condition of human nature. But it belongs to the condition ~
5021   3, 13  |                the condition ~of human nature that the health of the body
5022   3, 13  |             alone Who is the author of nature. Therefore ~they were not
5023   3, 13  |             ways. First, in its proper nature and power; and in this way,
5024   3, 13  |               the course and order ~of nature, so, too, was it incapable
5025   3, 13  |             since the soul, of its own nature, has a determinate ~relation
5026   3, 14  |            Christ assumed in the human nature; and ~first, of the defects
5027   3, 14  |           should have assumed in human nature defects ~of body?~(2) Whether
5028   3, 14  |                the Son of God in human nature ought to have assumed defects
5029   3, 14  |             not to have assumed human ~nature with defects of body. For
5030   3, 14  |                God made ~the soul of a nature so strong that from the
5031   3, 14  |               over even into the lower nature" (i.e. the body), "not indeed ~
5032   3, 14  |               Son of God assumed human nature with infirmities or ~defects
5033   3, 14  |          Incarnation. For ~since human nature is known to men only as
5034   3, 14  |               of God had assumed human nature without these ~defects,
5035   3, 14  |            what belongs to a ~passible nature; thus Damascene says (De
5036   3, 14  |         necessity is contrary to ~both nature and will, since these flow
5037   3, 14  |                the principles of human nature, as ~was said above in this
5038   3, 14  |                repugnant to the bodily nature, thus again was Christ's ~
5039   3, 14  |           considered in its own proper nature and power.~Aquin.: SMT TP
5040   3, 14  |                what we derive with our nature from birth. But Christ, ~
5041   3, 14  |           Christ, ~together with human nature, derived His bodily defects
5042   3, 14  |            caused by the principles of nature is derived ~together with
5043   3, 14  |              is derived ~together with nature, and hence is contracted.
5044   3, 14  |                the principles of human nature. Therefore Christ contracted ~
5045   3, 14  |            such like ~defects in human nature is sin, since "by sin death
5046   3, 14  |               from the height of human nature, which it ~had before the
5047   3, 14  |                  For He received human nature ~without sin, in the purity
5048   3, 14  |               might have assumed human nature without defects. Thus it
5049   3, 14  |             Christ's flesh assumed the nature without sin, and ~He might
5050   3, 14  |              likewise have assumed the nature without its penalties. But
5051   3, 14  |            corporeal defects of human ~nature is twofold: the first is
5052   3, 14  |           satisfy for the sin of human nature, and for this it was ~necessary
5053   3, 14  |                common sin of the whole nature, yet are not incompatible
5054   3, 14  |                from the whole of human nature in common on ~account of
5055   3, 14  |                as ~following all human nature in common; indetractible,
5056   3, 14  |               for the sin of the whole nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[14] A[
5057   3, 15  |                the truth of ~His human nature, and that He might become
5058   3, 15  |                 the truth of His human nature is not proved by sin, ~since
5059   3, 15  |               does not belong to human nature, whereof God is the cause;
5060   3, 15  |            been sown in it against its nature by the devil, as Damascene ~
5061   3, 15  |           Christ did not receive human nature from Adam ~actively, but
5062   3, 15  |              there belongs to the very nature of ~the "fomes" of sin an
5063   3, 15  |                the "fomes" of sin, the nature of which consists in the ~
5064   3, 15  |            belongs to Him in His human nature, although it ~does not belong
5065   3, 15  |            belong to Him in His Divine Nature, as suffering and death.
5066   3, 15  |         belongs to Christ in His human nature; for Damascene says (De ~
5067   3, 15  |               an ignorant and enslaved nature." ~Therefore ignorance was
5068   3, 15  |             Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The nature assumed by Christ may be
5069   3, 15  |                 First, in its specific nature, and thus Damascene calls
5070   3, 15  |              hence he adds: "For man's nature is a slave of Him" (i.e.
5071   3, 15  |             and in this way ~the human nature in Christ was not affected
5072   3, 15  |             Child" (i.e. in His human ~nature) "know to call His father" (
5073   3, 15  |               else pertaining to man's nature. ~Hence Augustine says (
5074   3, 15  |            Only-begotten assumed human nature, not ceasing to be God;
5075   3, 15  |               for by the custom of our nature. Or when He took drink or ~
5076   3, 15  |               the reality of His human nature, He voluntarily assumed
5077   3, 15  |                that "upon the inferior nature, which is the body, there ~
5078   3, 16  |              predicated of the ~Divine Nature, and what belongs to the
5079   3, 16  |                Son of God of the human nature?~(6) Whether this is true: "
5080   3, 16  |              agreement ~than the human nature and the Divine. But in the
5081   3, 16  |               it seems that the ~human nature ought not to be predicated
5082   3, 16  |          belief, that the true Divine ~Nature is united with true human
5083   3, 16  |              is united with true human nature not only in person, but
5084   3, 16  |             word signifying the common nature in the concrete may stand
5085   3, 16  |                contained in the common nature, as this word "man" may
5086   3, 16  |                every suppositum of any nature we may truly ~and properly
5087   3, 16  |       predicate a word signifying that nature in the concrete, as ~"man"
5088   3, 16  |              is a ~suppositum of human nature this word man may be truly
5089   3, 16  |              is a hypostasis of ~human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5090   3, 16  |            Divine Persons agree in one Nature, and are ~distinguished
5091   3, 16  |              abstract. For the ~Divine Nature is not the human nature.
5092   3, 16  |                Nature is not the human nature. But because they agree
5093   3, 16  |                any hypostasis of human nature; and thus it may stand for
5094   3, 16  |               is a hypostasis of human nature. ~Now it is manifest that
5095   3, 16  |                considered in their own nature, because they thought there
5096   3, 16  |                to the man in His human nature, but in the eternal suppositum,
5097   3, 16  |               is a suppositum of human nature, as stated above.~Aquin.:
5098   3, 16  |              OBJ 3: Although the human nature in Christ is something new,
5099   3, 16  |                suppositum of the human nature is not new, but eternal.
5100   3, 16  |                on account of the human nature, ~but by reason of the suppositum,
5101   3, 16  |               by reason of His Divine ~Nature, so does manhood belong
5102   3, 16  |            manhood belong to the human nature. Now God is said to be ~"
5103   3, 16  |                in this ~way, the human nature is not called "divine" by
5104   3, 16  |              converted into the Divine Nature, ~but by its conjunction
5105   3, 16  |            conjunction with the Divine Nature in one hypostasis, as is ~
5106   3, 16  |             man by reason of the human nature, which this ~word "man"
5107   3, 16  |                was first of the Divine Nature, i.e. from eternity. Afterwards ~
5108   3, 16  |             made a suppositum of human nature by the Incarnation. And ~
5109   3, 16  |              but that it assumed human nature. But the converse of this
5110   3, 16  |             that a suppositum of human nature assumed the Divine Nature;
5111   3, 16  |              nature assumed the Divine Nature; hence ~we may not say a "
5112   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature can be predicated of God?~
5113   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature cannot be ~said of God.
5114   3, 16  |                 what ~belongs to human nature is contrary to what is proper
5115   3, 16  |                it belongs to the human nature ~to be created temporal
5116   3, 16  |             what belongs to the human ~nature cannot be said of God.~Aquin.:
5117   3, 16  |            what pertains ~to the human nature contains a kind of defect,
5118   3, 16  |             what pertains to the human nature can ~nowise be said of God.~
5119   3, 16  |          assumed pertains to the human nature; yet it does ~not pertain
5120   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature cannot be ~said of God.~
5121   3, 16  |            such as pertained to human ~nature should not be predicated
5122   3, 16  |               pertained to the ~Divine Nature should not be predicated
5123   3, 16  |             His Divine or in His human nature may be said either of ~God
5124   3, 16  |       signified by ~the name of either nature. Thus whether we say "man"
5125   3, 16  |         hypostasis of Divine and human nature is signified. And hence,
5126   3, 16  |             what belongs to the Divine Nature, as of a hypostasis of the ~
5127   3, 16  |              hypostasis of the ~Divine Nature; and of God may be said
5128   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature, ~as of a hypostasis of
5129   3, 16  |               of a hypostasis of human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5130   3, 16  |              that belong to the Divine Nature are predicated of Christ
5131   3, 16  |               of Christ in His ~Divine Nature, and those that belong to
5132   3, 16  |               that belong to the human nature are predicated ~of Christ
5133   3, 16  |                 of Christ in His human nature. Hence Augustine says (De
5134   3, 16  |       attributed to God ~in His Divine Nature, it would be a blasphemy,
5135   3, 16  |       attributed to Him in His assumed nature. Hence in a discourse of ~
5136   3, 16  |            assumed for us injures that Nature which can be subject ~to
5137   3, 16  |            things Its own, to save our nature. ~Therefore, since these
5138   3, 16  |              do no harm to the ~Divine Nature, but bring about our salvation,
5139   3, 16  |              assumed pertains to human nature, not in its ~suppositum,
5140   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature can be predicated of the
5141   3, 16  |              predicated of the Divine ~Nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5142   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature can be said ~of the Divine
5143   3, 16  |             can be said ~of the Divine Nature. For what belongs to the
5144   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature is predicated ~of the Son
5145   3, 16  |                God. But God is His own Nature. Therefore, what ~belongs
5146   3, 16  |             what ~belongs to the human nature may be predicated of the
5147   3, 16  |               predicated of the Divine Nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5148   3, 16  |                flesh pertains to human nature. But as Damascene ~says (
5149   3, 16  |        Athanasius and ~Cyril, that the Nature of the Word was incarnate."
5150   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature may be said ~of the Divine
5151   3, 16  |             may be said ~of the Divine Nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5152   3, 16  |             what belongs to the Divine Nature belongs to Christ's ~human
5153   3, 16  |             belongs to Christ's ~human nature; such as to know future
5154   3, 16  |              may be said of the Divine Nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5155   3, 16  |              the Godhead is the Divine Nature. Therefore what is ~proper
5156   3, 16  |                is ~proper to the human nature cannot be said of the Divine
5157   3, 16  |           cannot be said of the Divine Nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5158   3, 16  |             hence ~what belongs to one nature cannot be predicated of
5159   3, 16  |             for the hypostasis of the ~nature; and hence of concrete words
5160   3, 16  |                what ~belongs to either nature - whether the word of which
5161   3, 16  |              predicated ~refers to one nature, as the word "Christ," by
5162   3, 16  |            anointed"; or to the Divine Nature ~alone, as this word "God"
5163   3, 16  |              OBJ 1: In God, Person and Nature are really the same; and
5164   3, 16  |               this identity the Divine Nature is predicated of the Son
5165   3, 16  |                not said of the ~Divine Nature; thus we say that the Son
5166   3, 16  |               not say ~that the Divine Nature is born; as was said in
5167   3, 16  |                not say that the Divine Nature suffered.~Aquin.: SMT TP
5168   3, 16  |              flesh. Now in Christ each nature is united to the other in ~
5169   3, 16  |               of this union the Divine Nature is said to be ~incarnate
5170   3, 16  |                incarnate and the human nature deified, as stated above (
5171   3, 16  |             What belongs to the Divine Nature is predicated of the ~human
5172   3, 16  |               predicated of the ~human nature - not, indeed, as it belongs
5173   3, 16  |             essentially to the Divine ~Nature, but as it is participated
5174   3, 16  |              participated by the human nature. Hence, whatever ~cannot
5175   3, 16  |              participated by the human nature (as to be uncreated and ~
5176   3, 16  |                predicated of the human nature. But the Divine ~Nature
5177   3, 16  |                nature. But the Divine ~Nature received nothing by participation
5178   3, 16  |           participation from the human nature; and hence ~what belongs
5179   3, 16  |              what belongs to the human nature can nowise be predicated
5180   3, 16  |              predicated of the Divine ~Nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5181   3, 16  |            time of His assuming human ~nature. Hence, this is true, "God
5182   3, 16  |               all those in whom ~human nature begins to be in a newly
5183   3, 16  |             man, inasmuch as the human nature began to be in an ~eternally
5184   3, 16  |               suppositum of the Divine Nature. And hence for God ~to be
5185   3, 16  |              by ~a change in the human nature, which is assumed to a Divine
5186   3, 16  |               on the part of the human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5187   3, 16  |                as it subsists in human nature. Hence, although this is
5188   3, 16  |               by being united to human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
5189   3, 16  |          uniting is not God, but human nature, which the word "man" ~signifies.
5190   3, 16  |               of the Man in His ~human nature, but in His suppositum.
5191   3, 16  |                the suppositum of human nature, ~of Whom "to be God" is
5192   3, 16  |                formally, i.e. for ~the nature signified. Hence when it
5193   3, 16  |                attributed to the human nature but to the suppositum of ~
5194   3, 16  |               suppositum of ~the human nature, Which is God from eternity,
5195   3, 16  |                terminated in the human nature. Hence, properly ~speaking,
5196   3, 16  |            some word ~signifying human nature in the abstract, it might
5197   3, 16  |               it were said that "human nature ~was made the Son of God'
5198   3, 16  |               is the property of human nature ~to be created, as it is
5199   3, 16  |             the property of the Divine Nature to be Creator. ~Hence both
5200   3, 16  |                simple not a composite ~Nature." Therefore it must not
5201   3, 16  |                  not only in His human nature, but even in His Divine
5202   3, 16  |      qualification, viz. "in His human nature." But such ~things as could
5203   3, 16  |          Christ by reason of His human nature; ~thus we say simply that
5204   3, 16  |                 just as of the Divine ~Nature, may be predicated equally
5205   3, 16  |            which we may ~doubt to what nature they belong, are not to
5206   3, 16  |          implies a suppositum of human nature. But Christ ~was not always
5207   3, 16  |           always a suppositum of human nature. Therefore this Man began
5208   3, 16  |              to be refers to the human nature, which is signified by this
5209   3, 16  |         formally so as to ~signify the nature, but is taken materially
5210   3, 16  |                it ~signifies the human nature, which began to be, nevertheless
5211   3, 16  |             subject, and refers to the nature when ~placed in the predicate,
5212   3, 16  |              created except the human ~nature. But this is false: "Christ
5213   3, 16  |             Christ as Man is the human nature." Therefore ~this is also
5214   3, 16  |        suppositum or by reason of ~the nature. If it be added by reason
5215   3, 16  |                suppositum of the human nature in Christ is eternal and
5216   3, 16  |                by ~reason of the human nature, it is true, since by reason
5217   3, 16  |                by reason of the human ~nature or in the human nature,
5218   3, 16  |                 nature or in the human nature, it belongs to Him to be
5219   3, 16  |            reduplication signifies the nature rather than the suppositum,
5220   3, 16  |                Christ is not the human nature, He has human ~nature. Now
5221   3, 16  |            human nature, He has human ~nature. Now the word "creature"
5222   3, 16  |            reduplication refers to the nature, as was stated above. ~And
5223   3, 16  |                above. ~And because the nature is created and the suppositum
5224   3, 16  |               is a suppositum of human nature ~alone to have his being
5225   3, 16  |                his being only in human nature. Hence of every such ~suppositum
5226   3, 16  |         suppositum not merely of human nature, but also ~of the Divine
5227   3, 16  |                but also ~of the Divine Nature, in which He has an uncreated
5228   3, 16  |              First as referring to the nature; and in this way it ~is
5229   3, 16  |              is God, because the human nature is ~distinct from the Divine
5230   3, 16  |              Divine by a difference of nature. Secondly it may be ~taken
5231   3, 16  |                suppositum of the human nature in Christ is the Person
5232   3, 16  |           reduplication ~signifies the nature rather than the suppositum,
5233   3, 16  |            belongs to Him in His human nature, and the second, in His ~
5234   3, 16  |             the second, in His ~Divine Nature. Hence this is true: "Christ
5235   3, 16  |             not by virtue of the human nature, but by virtue of the Divine
5236   3, 16  |                by virtue of the Divine Nature, in ~which Divine Nature
5237   3, 16  |               Nature, in ~which Divine Nature resides the power of forgiving
5238   3, 16  | authoritatively; ~whereas in the human nature it resides instrumentally
5239   3, 16  |     indivisible union He ~united human nature to the power of the Godhead,
5240   3, 16  |                a substance of rational nature. But He ~is not a universal
5241   3, 16  |      individual substance of rational ~nature; as Boethius says (De Duab.
5242   3, 16  |                Man is a being of human nature, and a ~suppositum and a
5243   3, 16  |               a hypostasis of the same nature. But every hypostasis and ~
5244   3, 16  |          suppositum and being of human nature is a person. Therefore Christ
5245   3, 16  |               the suppositum or to the nature. Hence ~when it is said: "
5246   3, 16  |               the ~suppositum of human nature is nothing else than the
5247   3, 16  |              taken as referring to the nature, it may be understood ~in
5248   3, 16  |               if it belonged to human ~nature to be in a person, and in
5249   3, 16  |            whatever ~subsists in human nature is a person. Secondly it
5250   3, 16  |               principles of the human ~nature, is due to the human nature;
5251   3, 16  |            nature, is due to the human nature; and in this way Christ
5252   3, 16  |                person, since the human nature does not exist of itself
5253   3, 16  |          itself apart from the ~Divine Nature, and yet the notion of person
5254   3, 16  |         everything subsisting in human nature is a person. Now this is
5255   3, 16  |                subsisting in His human nature is not ~caused by the principles
5256   3, 16  |                principles of the human nature, but is eternal. Hence in ~
5257   3, 16  |             same reason, can the human nature in Christ, ~although it
5258   3, 16  |            self-subsisting in rational nature, so a hypostasis, suppositum,
5259   3, 16  |              suppositum, and ~being of nature in the genus of substance,
5260   3, 16  |                itself. Hence, as human nature is not of itself a person ~
5261   3, 16  |               suppositum or a being of nature. Hence in the sense in ~
5262   3, 17  |              are three Persons ~in one Nature, so in the mystery of the
5263   3, 17  |            account of the unity of the Nature, notwithstanding ~the distinction
5264   3, 17  |              account of the duality of nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
5265   3, 17  |               Christ has a duality of ~nature. Therefore Christ is two.~
5266   3, 17  |               Para. 1/2~I answer that, Nature, considered in itself, as
5267   3, 17  |            word Christ, is the Divine ~Nature and is God. But the human
5268   3, 17  |              and is God. But the human nature cannot be predicated of
5269   3, 17  |              say that "Christ is human nature," ~because human nature
5270   3, 17  |                nature," ~because human nature is not naturally predicated
5271   3, 17  |              this sense - "having this nature and ~another." And it is
5272   3, 17  |                suppositum, but another nature, since terms placed in the ~
5273   3, 17  |               Therefore He has another nature."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
5274   3, 17  |        something" signifies the Divine Nature, which is predicated even
5275   3, 17  |               signifies, not the human nature as ~it is in the abstract,
5276   3, 17  |          inasmuch as it underlies ~the nature and not the individuating
5277   3, 17  |                suppositum of the human nature in Christ, which is the
5278   3, 17  |            numerically with the Divine Nature, which is ~predicated of
5279   3, 17  |              Divine Trinity the Divine Nature is ~predicated, even in
5280   3, 17  |        although ~Christ has duality of nature, yet, because He has not
5281   3, 17  |         substance. Now not merely the ~nature, but also the suppositum
5282   3, 17  |                 15. Hence diversity of nature does not suffice for ~anything
5283   3, 17  |           suppositum. But diversity of nature makes "another thing" relatively, ~
5284   3, 17  |            thing" relatively, ~i.e. in nature, if there is no diversity
5285   3, 17  |             that whatever follows the ~nature is doubled in Christ. But
5286   3, 17  |          Christ. But being follows the nature, for being is ~from the
5287   3, 17  |               Son of God is the Divine Nature itself, ~and is eternal:
5288   3, 17  |              Christ is not the Divine ~Nature, but is a temporal being.
5289   3, 17  |                account of the unity of nature there is only one being.
5290   3, 17  |                things belonging to the nature in Christ must ~be two;
5291   3, 17  |             being pertains both to the nature and to the hypostasis; to
5292   3, 17  |           which has being - and to the nature as to that ~whereby it has
5293   3, 17  |              whereby it has being. For nature is taken after the manner
5294   3, 17  |             that if there is a form or nature which does not pertain to
5295   3, 17  |               If, therefore, the human nature accrued to the Son of God,
5296   3, 17  |              And thus, since the human nature is united to the Son of
5297   3, 17  |              follows that by the human nature there accrued to Him ~no
5298   3, 17  |            personal being to the human nature, in such a way that the
5299   3, 17  |          Divine, but also in the human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
5300   3, 17  |               Being is consequent upon nature, not as upon that which
5301   3, 17  |               from the duality of the ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
5302   3, 17  |              God, which is the Divine ~Nature, becomes the being of man,
5303   3, 17  |             man, inasmuch as the human nature is assumed ~by the Son of
5304   3, 17  |              Person is the same as the Nature, there is no ~distinction
5305   3, 17  |           Person and the ~being of the Nature, and, consequently, the
5306   3, 17  |             them from the being of the Nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
5307   3, 17  |              it the complement of its ~nature and species. But if we consider
5308   3, 17  |               has a relation to such a nature, and of this relation the ~
5309   3, 17  |          inasmuch as it perfects human nature by informing the ~body.~
5310   3, 18  |              Whether in Christ's human nature the will of sensuality is
5311   3, 18  |               its mover. Now the human nature of Christ was the instrument
5312   3, 18  |               Godhead. Hence the human nature of Christ was not moved
5313   3, 18  |           Christ which belongs to the ~nature. But the will does not seem
5314   3, 18  |            does not seem to pertain to nature: for natural ~things are
5315   3, 18  |            that way belongs not to our nature but to our intellect," i.e. ~
5316   3, 18  |             all who held one composite nature in Christ ~were forced to
5317   3, 18  |          believed that ~Christ's human nature never moved with its own
5318   3, 18  |                assumed a perfect human nature, as was ~shown above (Q[
5319   3, 18  |               the perfection ~of human nature, being one of its natural
5320   3, 18  |              will, together with human nature. Now by the assumption ~
5321   3, 18  |               the assumption ~of human nature the Son of God suffered
5322   3, 18  |                pertains to ~His Divine Nature, to which it belongs to
5323   3, 18  |              Whatever was in the human nature of Christ was moved at the ~
5324   3, 18  |               the will proper to human nature, for the good wills of ~
5325   3, 18  |       according to the property of its nature. For an ~inanimate instrument,
5326   3, 18  |             this manner that the human nature of ~Christ was the instrument
5327   3, 18  |          necessarily follows ~upon the nature; but the movement or act
5328   3, 18  |               the will pertains to the nature, "to ~will in a certain
5329   3, 18  |            certain way" belongs to the nature, not indeed considered ~
5330   3, 18  |                will is consequent upon nature, as was said (A[1]). But ~
5331   3, 18  |              Christ there was only one nature besides the Divine. Hence
5332   3, 18  |              Son of God assumed human ~nature together with everything
5333   3, 18  |               the perfection of human ~nature. Now in human nature is
5334   3, 18  |            human ~nature. Now in human nature is included animal nature,
5335   3, 18  |              nature is included animal nature, as the genus in ~its species.
5336   3, 18  |               together with the ~human nature whatever belongs to animal
5337   3, 18  |             whatever belongs to animal nature; one of which things is ~
5338   3, 18  |          serpent - not as regards ~the nature of the sensuality, which
5339   3, 18  |                 there is but one human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
5340   3, 18  |                Now Christ in His human nature ~had whatever belongs to
5341   3, 18  |                the perfection of human nature. Hence both the ~foregoing
5342   3, 18  |               by the masters "will as ~nature," is different from the
5343   3, 18  |        distinguish in Christ a will as nature, which is called ~{thelesis},
5344   3, 18  |                the ~will considered as nature, inasmuch as it shrinks
5345   3, 18  |             itself, ~which implies the nature of an end; the other whereby
5346   3, 18  |                 which ~pertains to the nature of means. Now, as the Philosopher
5347   3, 18  |              the same as ~the "will as nature"; but choice is the same
5348   3, 18  |              when it is in an ignorant nature. We may also say the same
5349   3, 18  |             when it is in an ignorant ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[18] A[
5350   3, 18  |                according to His human ~nature there is a twofold will,
5351   3, 18  |        considered ~after the manner of nature, or after the manner of
5352   3, 18  |               like manner, the will as nature turns from what is against
5353   3, 18  |             turns from what is against nature and ~what is evil in itself,
5354   3, 18  |            rational will considered as nature, Christ could will what
5355   3, 18  |              by His will considered as nature ~which regards things absolutely
5356   3, 18  |             would not suffice for the ~nature of contrariety, nor even
5357   3, 18  |          contrariety, nor even for the nature of contradiction, e.g. if ~
5358   3, 18  |       according to the order of ~their nature. Hence it is clear that
5359   3, 18  |            whose permission ~the human nature in Christ was moved by its
5360   3, 19  |                operations of the human nature?~(3) Whether Christ by His
5361   3, 19  |      instrumental agent. Now the human nature in Christ was the instrument
5362   3, 19  |                Jesus Christ the human ~nature is moved and ruled by the
5363   3, 19  |            another ~thing by His human nature, as to walk in body. Hence
5364   3, 19  |             neither was ~this from one nature, and that from another;
5365   3, 19  |          Therefore in Christ the human nature has its proper form and
5366   3, 19  |                Divine. Hence the human nature has its ~proper operation
5367   3, 19  |              Nevertheless, ~the Divine Nature makes use of the operation
5368   3, 19  |             the operation of the human nature, as of ~the operation of
5369   3, 19  |              in the same way the human nature ~shares in the operation
5370   3, 19  |                operation of the Divine Nature, as an instrument shares
5371   3, 19  |              the Divine and the human ~nature in Christ) "do what is proper
5372   3, 19  |              say either that the human nature had not ~its proper form
5373   3, 19  |                 by the first the human nature in Christ is supposed to
5374   3, 19  |              begotten belongs to human nature, and likewise to walk; ~
5375   3, 19  |                 the other of the human nature, is clear from what he says,
5376   3, 19  |            operation of Christ's human nature, as the instrument of ~the
5377   3, 19  |                nevertheless, the human nature in ~Christ, inasmuch as
5378   3, 19  |            inasmuch as it is a certain nature, has a proper operation ~
5379   3, 19  |             however, with the form and nature from which the operation ~
5380   3, 19  |               person by reason of the ~nature; yet in a different manner.
5381   3, 19  |                this respect it has the nature of a ~term; consequently,
5382   3, 19  |                by reason of a ~form or nature. Hence plurality of operations
5383   3, 19  |             one work, inasmuch ~as one nature acts in union with the other.~
5384   3, 19  |                operations in the human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19] A[
5385   3, 19  |                 is consequent upon the nature." But in Christ there is
5386   3, 19  |               there is only one human ~nature. Therefore in Christ there
5387   3, 19  |          reason of some part of ~human nature - sometimes by reason of
5388   3, 19  |             sometimes by reason of the nature of elementary bodies, as ~
5389   3, 19  |          vegetative soul, or from the ~nature of elemental bodies, are
5390   3, 19  |               regards a part of ~human nature. Now it was said (A[1])
5391   3, 19  |           Christ is ~the Son of God by nature, the eternal inheritance
5392   3, 19  |                unless it ~be of such a nature that its want would detract
5393   3, 19  |                Reply OBJ 2: Because by nature Christ is God and the Son
5394   3, 19  |                principle of the whole ~nature, is transmitted to others
5395   3, 20  |             subservience to the ~human nature of Christ; for Damascene
5396   3, 20  |               it" (i.e. Christ's human nature) ~"a servant; for the words '
5397   3, 20  |      domination' are not names ~of the nature, but of relations, as the
5398   3, 20  |              Hence Christ in His human nature is not subject to God the ~
5399   3, 20  |             answer that, Whoever has a nature is competent to have what
5400   3, 20  |                what is proper ~to that nature. Now human nature from its
5401   3, 20  |              to that nature. Now human nature from its beginning has a
5402   3, 20  |                inasmuch as ~the Divine Nature is the very essence of goodness
5403   3, 20  |                Nom. i) while a created nature has a participation of the ~
5404   3, 20  |             goodness. ~Secondly, human nature is subject to God, as regards
5405   3, 20  |              power, ~inasmuch as human nature, even as every creature,
5406   3, 20  |              ordinance. Thirdly, human nature is especially ~subject to
5407   3, 20  |               He Himself, in His human nature, did not ~attain to the
5408   3, 20  |               than Christ in His human nature. The second subjection is ~
5409   3, 20  |          simply, but only in His human nature, whether this qualification
5410   3, 20  |                simply but in His human nature, even ~if this qualification
5411   3, 20  |               is not attributed to the nature as ~agent, but to the person,
5412   3, 20  |            action is attributed to the nature as to that whereby the person
5413   3, 20  |              acts. Hence, although the nature is not properly said to
5414   3, 20  |                serving in this or that nature. And in this way nothing ~
5415   3, 20  |         servant to the Father in human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[20] A[
5416   3, 20  |           greater than Christ in human nature) ~"that the Son is less
5417   3, 20  |          greater than the Son in human nature. Therefore the Son is greater
5418   3, 20  |         greater than ~Himself in human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[20] A[
5419   3, 20  |           Further, Christ in His human nature is the servant of God the
5420   3, 20  |              hypostasis according to a nature. Hence when ~it is said
5421   3, 20  |               Father; and in the other nature, in which He agrees with
5422   3, 20  |           pertains to Him in His human nature is rather to be attributed
5423   3, 20  |            qualification, in His human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[20] A[
5424   3, 20  |              to, Himself in ~His human nature, and not by a diversity
5425   3, 21  |              every other part of human nature. Much more, ~therefore,
5426   3, 21  |            that the Son of God in the ~nature that He assumed was "made
5427   3, 21  |            sensuality ~was of the same nature and species in Christ as
5428   3, 21  |              He had taken a true human nature, with all its natural ~affections:
5429   3, 21  |                every part of the human nature; but the uplifting of ~prayer
5430   3, 21  |           simple will, considered as a nature; as when He prayed that
5431   3, 21  |               procession in the Divine Nature, and of all the good that
5432   3, 21  |                possesses in ~the human nature. Now just as in His human
5433   3, 21  |               Now just as in His human nature He had already received ~
5434   3, 21  |          already received in His human nature, by ~acknowledging Him as
5435   3, 21  |                due to Him in His human nature, such as the glory ~of His
5436   3, 21  |                which is ~considered as nature is willed not absolutely
5437   3, 22  |               partakers of ~the Divine Nature." Moreover, He reconciled
5438   3, 22  |           Hence in so far as His human nature ~operated by virtue of the
5439   3, 23  |               OBJ 1: Considered in his nature man is not a stranger in
5440   3, 23  |             which is by grace, not ~by nature; wherefore it is written (
5441   3, 23  |                of the oneness of their Nature: ~since, where there is
5442   3, 23  |              since, where there is one nature, there must needs be one
5443   3, 23  |              are not of one individual nature, so ~that there need be
5444   3, 23  |              is proper to the rational nature to be adopted?~Aquin.: SMT
5445   3, 23  |             not proper to the rational nature to be ~adopted. For God
5446   3, 23  |                whatever is proper to a nature, belongs to all that have ~
5447   3, 23  |         belongs to all that have ~that nature: just as risibility belongs
5448   3, 23  |               belong to every rational nature. Therefore it is not proper
5449   3, 23  |                is not proper to ~human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[23] A[
5450   3, 23  |               to none but the rational nature. ~Therefore it is proper
5451   3, 23  |              is proper to the rational nature to be adopted.~Aquin.: SMT
5452   3, 23  |       Intellectual Word, in oneness of nature ~with the Father. To this
5453   3, 23  |         rational creature, even in its nature, is likened to the ~Word
5454   3, 23  |            property resulting not from nature, but from ~grace, of which
5455   3, 23  |           grace, of which the rational nature is capable. Therefore it
5456   3, 23  |               belong to every rational nature: but every rational creature
5457   3, 23  |      hypostasis or person, not ~to the nature; whence in the FP, Q[32],
5458   3, 23  |      hypostasis, to Whom it belongs by nature to be ~the Son. But it has
5459   3, 23  |             not properly belong to the nature, so ~neither does adoption.
5460   3, 23  |             signify the union of human nature to the Person of the Son.~
5461   3, 23  |               the person, but also the nature: but this cannot be ~said
5462   3, 24  |            things in Christ: His human nature ~and His person. But it
5463   3, 24  |                by ~reason of His human nature; for this proposition is
5464   3, 24  |     proposition is false - "The human ~nature is Son of God." In like
5465   3, 24  |              God, not by grace, but by nature: whereas ~predestination
5466   3, 24  |         predestination to refer to the nature ~and not to the Person -
5467   3, 24  |               is to say, that on human nature was bestowed ~the grace
5468   3, 24  |               not speak of a person's ~nature, but of his person, as being
5469   3, 24  |              is not befitting to human nature; for ~this proposition is
5470   3, 24  |       proposition is false: "The human nature is the Son of God": unless ~
5471   3, 24  |          predestinated that the Human ~nature should be united to the
5472   3, 24  |               subsisting in the Divine Nature, but as ~subsisting in the
5473   3, 24  |                subsisting in the human nature. Wherefore the Apostle,
5474   3, 24  |                considered in the human nature, in ~respect of which this
5475   3, 24  |             but by reason of the human nature: since, although that Person ~
5476   3, 24  |               one ~subsisting in human nature was the Son of God. Hence
5477   3, 24  |              the subject of a ~form or nature in reality, can be apprehended
5478   3, 24  |          apprehended to exist in human nature, because at one time ~it
5479   3, 24  |             that one existing in human nature was the Son of God; ~therefore
5480   3, 24  |                by reason ~of His human nature alone: for human nature
5481   3, 24  |                nature alone: for human nature was not always united to
5482   3, 24  |       Consequently, by reason of human nature alone can predestination
5483   3, 24  |               Sanct. xv): ~"This human nature of ours was predestinated
5484   3, 24  |                him ~by reason of human nature. Consequently, we must say
5485   3, 24  |                be referred to the very nature of the action itself: ~that
5486   3, 24  |                by reason of His human ~nature, as stated above. And in
5487   3, 24  |                man by reason of human ~nature, in two ways. First, so
5488   3, 24  |             ways. First, so that human nature be the cause thereof: ~thus
5489   3, 24  |            Socrates by reason of human nature, being ~caused by its principles.
5490   3, 24  |                man, by reason of human nature. This is ~the sense of the
5491   3, 24  |            someone ~by reason of human nature, because human nature is
5492   3, 24  |            human nature, because human nature is susceptible of it. And ~
5493   3, 24  |      predestinated by reason of human ~nature; because predestination
5494   3, 24  |                the exaltation of human nature ~in Him, as stated above.~
5495   3, 24  |               of God Who assumed human nature." Consequently, since this ~
5496   3, 24  |              man, but rather on ~human nature, that it might be united
5497   3, 24  |             seems to be of a different nature from ours: because we ~are
5498   3, 24  |               seems to pertain to ~the nature of an exemplar. Therefore
5499   3, 24  |              in Christ; because ~human nature in Him, without any antecedent
5500   3, 25  |               the action of the Divine Nature is distinct ~from that of