Part, Question
1 1, 7 | does not agree with the totality of magnitude; yet it agrees
2 1, 7 | yet it agrees with the ~totality of time and movement: for
3 1, 8 | is whole in any place by totality of quantity, ~cannot be
4 1, 8 | and hence there is no ~totality of quantity without totality
5 1, 8 | totality of quantity without totality of place. But totality of
6 1, 8 | without totality of place. But totality of essence ~is not commensurate
7 1, 8 | not commensurate to the totality of place. Hence it is not
8 1, 8 | for that which is whole by totality of essence in a thing, not
9 1, 8 | surface if we speak of its totality of essence; because according
10 1, 8 | the ~surface. But if its totality be considered according
11 1, 8 | incorporeal substances have no totality either of ~themselves or
12 1, 66 | being in act, unless in its totality it be act ~and form, or
13 1, 66 | it follows that in its ~totality it is form and act. But
14 1, 66 | was created at once in its totality. But time, as ~not being
15 1, 76 | there are three kinds ~of totality, corresponding to three
16 1, 76 | parts. The first kind of ~totality does not apply to forms,
17 1, 76 | therefore quantitative ~totality cannot be attributed to
18 1, 76 | But the second kind of totality, which depends on logical ~
19 1, 76 | and likewise the virtual totality, because a form is the principle
20 1, 76 | If we ~mean quantitative totality which whiteness has accidentally,
21 1, 76 | The same is to be ~said of totality of power: since the whiteness
22 1, 76 | thereof. But if we mean totality of species and essence,
23 1, 76 | soul has not quantitative totality, neither ~essentially, nor
24 1, 76 | each part of the body, by totality of perfection and ~of essence,
25 1, 76 | of essence, but not by totality of power. For it is not
26 1, 67 | being in act, unless in its totality it be act ~and form, or
27 1, 67 | it follows that in its ~totality it is form and act. But
28 1, 67 | was created at once in its totality. But time, as ~not being
29 1, 75 | there are three kinds ~of totality, corresponding to three
30 1, 75 | parts. The first kind of ~totality does not apply to forms,
31 1, 75 | therefore quantitative ~totality cannot be attributed to
32 1, 75 | But the second kind of totality, which depends on logical ~
33 1, 75 | and likewise the virtual totality, because a form is the principle
34 1, 75 | If we ~mean quantitative totality which whiteness has accidentally,
35 1, 75 | The same is to be ~said of totality of power: since the whiteness
36 1, 75 | thereof. But if we mean totality of species and essence,
37 1, 75 | soul has not quantitative totality, neither ~essentially, nor
38 1, 75 | each part of the body, by totality of perfection and ~of essence,
39 1, 75 | of essence, but not by totality of power. For it is not
40 2, 25 | aforesaid good resides in totality.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[26] A[
41 2, 42 | Therefore some kind of ~totality was to be indicated in connection
42 2, 48 | and particularity, or of totality and partiality, diversify ~
43 2, 182 | absolute, ~and answers to a totality not only on the part of
44 2, 182 | perfection answers to an absolute totality on the part of the ~lover,
45 2, 182 | perfection answers to a totality neither on the part of the ~
46 3, 7 | wholly and perfectly. Now ~totality and perfection can be taken
47 3, 46 | argument holds good of the totality of the soul with ~regard
48 3, 50 | His death; but that the ~totality of the assumed nature was
49 3, 76 | quantity. But the proper totality of substance is ~contained
50 Suppl, 77| Further, the body derives its totality from the same cause as it ~
51 Suppl, 77| it is divided. Therefore totality is ascribed to the body
52 Suppl, 77| all, if we consider the totality of matter; because all the
53 Suppl, 77| again, if we speak of the totality of the ~species which is
54 Suppl, 77| again if we speak of the totality of ~matter. The second and
55 Suppl, 77| again even if we speak of totality ~of matter: while they differ
56 Suppl, 77| again, if we speak of the totality of the species, but not
57 Suppl, 77| if we ~speak of material totality, so is it with the hair.
58 Suppl, 77| another part, if we speak of totality of species, since it ~occupies
59 Suppl, 77| part if we consider the totality of matter. The same ~applies
|