|    Part, Question1   2, 34  |        says in his commentary on Matthew [*Origen, Hom. vi in Num.]
 2   2, 61  |         fifteenth ~homily on St. Matthew, where he says: "The gentle,
 3   2, 69  |       the ~beatitudes recited by Matthew (v 3, seqq.) to the gifts
 4   2, 69  |      seven or eight mentioned in Matthew 5 are too many.~Aquin.:
 5   2, 87  |          the chapter quoted from Matthew (verse 32) we ~read: "Fill
 6   2, 106 |         in the ~last chapters of Matthew and Mark. Therefore the
 7   2, 81  |          it was ~superfluous for Matthew to mention seven.~Aquin.:
 8   2, 81  |           thus ~in the Gospel of Matthew we read, "supersubstantial,"
 9   2, 81  |      last petition ~mentioned by Matthew, "Deliver us from evil,"
10   2, 85  |        quoted are from Lk. 10:7: Matthew has 'meat' ~instead of '
11   2, 96  |         Opus Imperfectum on St. ~Matthew, falsely ascribed to St.
12   2, 170 |        says in his commentary on Matthew ~[*The quotation is from
13   2, 184 |    Consensu Ev. ii, 17) that "as Matthew and ~Mark relate, Peter
14   2, 187 |       Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Matthew the publican who was not
15   2, 187 |        youth but also the sinner Matthew. Yet Matthew obeyed His
16   2, 187 |          the sinner Matthew. Yet Matthew obeyed His call, ~and the
17   2, 187 |   commentary on this passage of ~Matthew, the reference is to the
18   3, 31  |          the seed of ~David. For Matthew, in tracing the genealogy
19   3, 31  |       the family of David, since Matthew ~traces the genealogy from
20   3, 31  |    conceived of ~Joseph, in whom Matthew's genealogy terminates.
21   3, 31  |   possibly have two fathers. But Matthew ~says that "Jacob begot
22   3, 31  |          on several ~points. For Matthew, at the commencement of
23   3, 31  |         by his son ~Joathan. But Matthew says that Joram begot Ozias.
24   3, 31  |       Now in ~Christ's genealogy Matthew mentions only three mothers -
25   3, 31  |        Christ's Godhead. Whereas Matthew relates the generation of
26   3, 31  |          will not stand: because Matthew mentions one of David's ~
27   3, 31  |       Wherefore others said that Matthew gave the true genealogy
28   3, 31  |         again have supposed that Matthew gave the forefathers according ~
29   3, 31  |       the son of Heli. Wherefore Matthew ~says "Jacob begot Joseph":
30   3, 31  |         patriarchs enumerated by Matthew, who is said to have set
31   3, 31  |          De Consensu Evang. ii) "Matthew ~purposed to delineate the
32   3, 31  |          personality: so that in Matthew's genealogy is signified
33   3, 31  |     sacrifice. "For which reason Matthew traces the generations downwards, ~
34   3, 31  |         For the same reason too "Matthew descends from David ~through
35   3, 31  |        it is also that, because "Matthew wished to signify ~that
36   3, 31  |         reigns in us. And ~thus "Matthew, putting forward the royal
37   3, 31  |         they were omitted by St. Matthew] was continuous."~Aquin.:
38   3, 38  |   Chrysostom says, commenting on Matthew (Hom. x in Matth.), "it
39   3, 40  |       Matth. 5:1], commenting on Matthew, says: ~"We read that our
40   3, 41  |       time that ~followed: since Matthew says that "after He had
41   3, 41  |         clear from the ~words of Matthew (4:11): "Then the devil
42   3, 41  | temptations which are related by Matthew and ~Luke, and occurred
43   3, 41  |       says (Ep. ccxi). Therefore Matthew ~unfittingly gives the last
44   3, 41  |       the ~Baptist, according to Matthew (3:4); or He could have
45   3, 44  |         heaven," He ~refused, as Matthew relates (12,16). Therefore
46   3, 46  |          9] R.O. 1 Para. 2/5~But Matthew's account (26:17) seems
47   3, 46  |    natural ~distinction of days, Matthew calls the first day of the
48   3, 46  |         iii): We can ~understand Matthew "as putting the plural for
49   3, 50  |        when ~Christ died. For as Matthew relates (27:46), when our
50   3, 51  |        cloth," as is related by ~Matthew (27:59), "but not with gold
51   3, 53  |    Jerome ~also in commenting on Matthew (27:52,53) says: "As Lazarus
52   3, 55  |         of Galilee, according to Matthew; ~the ninth occasion is
53   3, 55  |         Evangelists. ~Because in Matthew's account the angel is described
54   3, 55  |        women, according to both ~Matthew and Mark, if we take them
55   3, 55  |      back from the monument, as ~Matthew says; and that this is Mark'
56   3, 66  | concerning Baptism as related by Matthew ~(28:19): and on Whitsun-eve,
57   3, 78  |          and 1 Cor. 11:25, while Matthew says in chapter 26:28: "
58   3, 80  |       terms in his commentary on Matthew (Epist. xxviii, among ~St.
59 Suppl, 41|        says in his commentary on Matthew: "Although marriage brings ~
 
 |