Part, Question
1 2, 18 | species, as ~liberality and prodigality. Therefore also good and
2 2, 32 | more connatural to man than prodigality." Now it is a mark of ~prodigality
3 2, 32 | prodigality." Now it is a mark of ~prodigality to do good to others; while
4 2, 32 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Prodigality is an excessive spending,
5 2, 32 | is unnatural: ~wherefore prodigality is said to be contrary to
6 2, 72 | a sin of deficiency, and prodigality, by ~excess. Therefore excess
7 2, 86 | committing a mortal sin of prodigality, ~is so changed as to fall
8 2, 105| opposed to liberality than prodigality is. Now a vice may be opposed
9 2, 115| namely, ~covetousness and prodigality.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[117] Out.
10 2, 116| and (1) ~covetousness; (2) prodigality.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[118] Out.
11 2, 116| liberality has the vice ~of prodigality opposed to it.~Aquin.: SMT
12 2, 116| liberality as the mean, and to prodigality as ~extreme. But neither
13 2, 116| a principal virtue, nor prodigality a ~capital vice. Therefore
14 2, 116| 2/2~On the other hand, prodigality is not directed to an end
15 2, 117| 119] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF PRODIGALITY (THREE ARTICLES)~We must
16 2, 117| ARTICLES)~We must now consider prodigality, under which head there
17 2, 117| of inquiry:~(1) Whether prodigality is opposite to covetousness?~(
18 2, 117| covetousness?~(2) Whether prodigality is a sin? ~(3) Whether it
19 2, 117| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether prodigality is opposite to covetousness?~
20 2, 117| 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that prodigality is not opposite to covetousness.
21 2, 117| and covetous. Therefore prodigality is not opposite to ~covetousness.~
22 2, 117| affected towards money: whereas prodigality does not seem to relate
23 2, 117| else of the kind. Therefore prodigality is not opposite to ~covetousness.~
24 2, 117| above (FS, Q[62], A[3]). Now prodigality seems always to be directed
25 2, 117| Therefore it seems that prodigality is opposed to temperance ~
26 2, 117| Ethic. ii, 7; iv, 1) that ~prodigality is opposed to liberality,
27 2, 117| deficiency. Now covetousness and prodigality ~differ variously in respect
28 2, 117| regards external action, prodigality implies excess ~in giving,
29 2, 117| Hence it is evident that prodigality is opposed to ~covetousness.~
30 2, 117| so, too, covetousness and prodigality regard principally ~giving.
31 2, 117| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Prodigality regards passions in respect
32 2, 117| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether prodigality is a sin?~Aquin.: SMT SS
33 2, 117| 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that prodigality is not a sin. For the Apostle
34 2, 117| But it is not the root of prodigality, since this is opposed to ~
35 2, 117| opposed to ~it. Therefore prodigality is not a sin.~Aquin.: SMT
36 2, 117| prodigal persons do. Therefore prodigality is not a sin.~Aquin.: SMT
37 2, 117| Further, it belongs to prodigality to exceed in giving and
38 2, 117| to the poor." Therefore prodigality is not a sin.~Aquin.: SMT
39 2, 117| is held to blame for his prodigality.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[119] A[
40 2, 117| the opposition between ~prodigality and covetousness is one
41 2, 117| virtue. Hence it follows that prodigality ~is a sin.~Aquin.: SMT SS
42 2, 117| also it is evident ~that prodigality arises from covetousness;
43 2, 117| covetousness. Wherefore prodigality sometimes is born of ~covetousness,
44 2, 117| Reply OBJ 3: The excess in prodigality consists chiefly, not in
45 2, 117| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether prodigality is a more grievous sin than
46 2, 117| 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that prodigality is a more grievous sin than ~
47 2, 117| goods to him, whereas by prodigality a man injures ~himself,
48 2, 117| he be good?" ~Therefore prodigality is a more grievous sin than
49 2, 117| whereas the disorder of prodigality is accompanied by a ~circumstance
50 2, 117| inasmuch as we ascribe prodigality to ~those who are intemperate,
51 2, 117| Ethic. iv, 1). ~Therefore prodigality is a more grievous sin than
52 2, 117| Q[61], A[2], ad 1). Now prodigality is more ~opposed to prudence
53 2, 117| receive nothing." Therefore prodigality is a more grievous sin than ~
54 2, 117| Para. 1/1~I answer that, Prodigality considered in itself is
55 2, 117| iv, 6. ~Thirdly, because prodigality is easily cured. For not
56 2, 117| age, which is opposed to prodigality, but he ~is easily reduced
57 2, 117| exceed in giving. Moreover, ~prodigality is easily turned into virtue
58 2, 117| natures: thus, with regard to prodigality we note ~that it consumes
|