Part, Question
1 1, 29| own; for they are called "hypostases," or first substances.~Aquin.:
2 1, 29| genera and species are not hypostases or persons, these are not
3 1, 29| so the Greeks say "three hypostases." But because the word ~"
4 1, 29| as they ~profess several hypostases, inasmuch as the word "substance,"
5 1, 30| persons," they say "Three hypostases." We are not, however, accustomed
6 1, 31| Hence he says ~that the hypostases do not differ from each
7 1, 32| recognize ~difference of hypostases [i.e. of persons], in the
8 1, 39| subjects," "supposita," or ~"hypostases." So the divine persons
9 1, 39| are named "supposita" or ~"hypostases," but not as if there really
10 1, 39| the Greeks said "three ~hypostases," so also in Hebrew "Elohim"
11 1, 40| the persons leaves ~the hypostases distinct?~(4) Whether the
12 1, 40| substance. Therefore the ~hypostases cannot be distinguished
13 1, 40| have said that ~the divine hypostases are distinguished by origin,
14 1, 40| the distinctions of the hypostases or persons as ~resulting
15 1, 40| distinguish or constitute the hypostases or ~persons, inasmuch as
16 1, 40| say that the persons or hypostases are ~distinguished rather
17 1, 40| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the hypostases remain if the relations
18 1, 40| It would seem that the hypostases remain if the properties
19 1, 40| removed, then the idea of the hypostases and ~persons remains; as,
20 1, 40| understood as added to the divine hypostases, as a form is added to a ~
21 1, 40| distinguishes ~and constitutes the hypostases, as above explained (A[2]),
22 1, 40| mentally abstracted, the hypostases no ~longer remain. Some,
23 1, 40| noted, that the divine ~hypostases are not distinguished by
24 1, 40| distinguish and constitute the hypostases, as shown above (A[2]); ~
25 1, 40| distinguish and constitute the hypostases in God, but only manifest
26 1, 40| and constitute the divine hypostases. For ~origin has in God
27 1, 39| subjects," "supposita," or ~"hypostases." So the divine persons
28 1, 39| are named "supposita" or ~"hypostases," but not as if there really
29 1, 39| the Greeks said "three ~hypostases," so also in Hebrew "Elohim"
30 1, 40| the persons leaves ~the hypostases distinct?~(4) Whether the
31 1, 40| substance. Therefore the ~hypostases cannot be distinguished
32 1, 40| have said that ~the divine hypostases are distinguished by origin,
33 1, 40| the distinctions of the hypostases or persons as ~resulting
34 1, 40| distinguish or constitute the hypostases or ~persons, inasmuch as
35 1, 40| say that the persons or hypostases are ~distinguished rather
36 1, 40| Para. 1/1 ~Whether the hypostases remain if the relations
37 1, 40| It would seem that the hypostases remain if the properties
38 1, 40| removed, then the idea of the hypostases and ~persons remains; as,
39 1, 40| understood as added to the divine hypostases, as a form is added to a ~
40 1, 40| distinguishes ~and constitutes the hypostases, as above explained (A[2]),
41 1, 40| mentally abstracted, the hypostases no ~longer remain. Some,
42 1, 40| noted, that the divine ~hypostases are not distinguished by
43 1, 40| distinguish and constitute the hypostases, as shown above (A[2]); ~
44 1, 40| distinguish and constitute the hypostases in God, but only manifest
45 1, 40| and constitute the divine hypostases. For ~origin has in God
46 3, 2 | in Christ there are two ~hypostases, or two supposita, or that
47 3, 2 | Christ, but ~maintained two hypostases, or two supposita, saying
48 3, 2 | because to maintain two hypostases or supposita in Christ is
49 3, 2 | opinion which holds two ~hypostases, and the third which holds
50 3, 3 | incarnate in one ~of Its hypostases," as Damascene says (De
51 3, 4 | hold that there are two hypostases or two supposita in Christ, ~
52 3, 4 | nor did He assume all its ~hypostases."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[
53 3, 16| suppose two supposita or ~hypostases in Christ, since it is impossible
54 3, 16| persons or substances," i.e. hypostases, "such ~words as are in
55 3, 23| suppose two persons or two hypostases or two ~supposita in Christ,
56 3, 25| there are several persons or hypostases in ~Christ, it would follow
57 3, 50| the Word of God was two hypostases during such time as Christ
|