Part, Question
1 1, 14 | reason has to do with ~universals, sense with singular things."
2 1, 16 | always, is eternal. But universals are ~always and everywhere;
3 1, 16 | form. In this manner ~all universals are said to be everywhere
4 1, 16 | and always, in so far as ~universals are independent of place
5 1, 17 | because true ~and good are universals, and convertible with being.
6 1, 44 | is not necessary that the universals should ~exist outside the
7 1, 46 | whence it is said that universals are everywhere and always.
8 1, 57 | singulars, but the intellect, universals." Now, in the angels there
9 1, 57 | of things, apprehending universals ~and immaterial things by
10 1, 59 | while reason judges of universals. Therefore there must be
11 1, 64 | the intellect considers universals. ~Now the angel's apprehension
12 1, 76 | understand immaterial things ~and universals, it is sufficient that the
13 1, 76 | the intellect which knows universals.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[
14 1, 76 | of ~universal causes to universals is like the relation of
15 1, 76 | exclude the understanding of universals; ~otherwise, since separate
16 1, 76 | they could not understand universals. But the ~materiality of
17 1, 76 | intellectual soul as comprehending universals, has a ~power extending
18 1, 77 | accident as one of the five universals, in this sense there is
19 1, 45 | is not necessary that the universals should ~exist outside the
20 1, 47 | whence it is said that universals are everywhere and always.
21 1, 58 | singulars, but the intellect, universals." Now, in the angels there
22 1, 58 | of things, apprehending universals ~and immaterial things by
23 1, 60 | while reason judges of universals. Therefore there must be
24 1, 65 | the intellect considers universals. ~Now the angel's apprehension
25 1, 75 | understand immaterial things ~and universals, it is sufficient that the
26 1, 75 | the intellect which knows universals.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[
27 1, 75 | of ~universal causes to universals is like the relation of
28 1, 75 | exclude the understanding of universals; ~otherwise, since separate
29 1, 75 | they could not understand universals. But the ~materiality of
30 1, 75 | intellectual soul as comprehending universals, has a ~power extending
31 1, 76 | accident as one of the five universals, in this sense there is
32 1, 79 | intellectual knowledge is of universals; and so it is ~distinct
33 1, 84 | relation to ourselves. But ~universals come first as regards their
34 1, 84 | Categor. ix). ~Therefore the universals are secondarily known as
35 1, 84 | in relation to us. ~But universals are the more simple. Therefore
36 1, 84 | of "man." Therefore the universals are ~secondarily known by
37 1, 84 | principles by their effects. But ~universals are principles. Therefore
38 1, 84 | are principles. Therefore universals are secondarily known by ~
39 1, 84 | to Plato, who held that universals are ~subsistent, the universal
40 1, 84 | participations of ~the subsistent universals which he called ideas.~Aquin.:
41 1, 102| heavenly things and all universals; the ~second providence
42 2, 50 | sciences: since science is of universals, which the sensitive powers ~
43 2, 19 | and the intellect is about universals, while the appetite is ~
44 2, 45 | But ~"reason deals with universals," according to Phys. i,
45 2, 45 | take cognizance except of universals.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[47] A[
46 2, 45 | prudence ~does not deal with universals only, but needs to take
47 2, 45 | chiefly is concerned with universals, and ~yet it is able to
48 2, 45 | includes knowledge both ~of universals, and of the singular matters
49 2, 45 | regards the knowledge ~of universals, the same is to be said
50 2, 45 | which takes cognizance of universals, and consequently extends
51 2, 45 | prudence without knowledge of universals. ~But knowledge of universals
52 2, 45 | universals. ~But knowledge of universals can be lost through forgetfulness.
53 2, 45 | not in the knowledge of ~universals, but in applying them to
54 2, 45 | forgetting the knowledge of universals does not destroy the ~principal
55 2, 47 | The one is cognizant of universals, and this ~belongs to the
56 2, 47 | that he may ~rightly apply universals to particulars, which latter
|