Part, Question
1 1, 6 | alone. For as "one" is convertible with "being," so is "good";
2 1, 6 | good. And because good is ~convertible with being, as one is also;
3 1, 11 | thinking that the "one" convertible with "being" is ~the same
4 1, 11 | seeing that the "one" ~convertible with "being" did not add
5 1, 11 | thought that the "one" convertible with "being" added a ~reality
6 1, 11 | that the "one" which is ~convertible with "being," does not add
7 1, 11 | x. But the "one" which convertible with "being" ~is opposed
8 1, 11 | one and to good, which are convertible ~with being, for the privation
9 1, 11 | neither can ~"one" which is convertible with "being" be predicated
10 1, 11 | idea. But "one" which is convertible with ~being is a metaphysical
11 1, 13 | less universal, or, if convertible with it, add something above
12 1, 14 | truth" and "being" are ~convertible terms. Therefore the knowledge
13 1, 16 | Whether the true and being are convertible terms?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
14 1, 16 | the true and being are not convertible terms. For ~the true resides
15 1, 16 | Therefore they are not convertible.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[16] A[
16 1, 16 | being and not-being is not ~convertible with being. But the true
17 1, 16 | true and being are not convertible.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[16] A[
18 1, 16 | posteriority seem not to be convertible. But the true appears to
19 1, 16 | Therefore it seems they are not convertible.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[16] A[
20 1, 16 | And ~therefore, as good is convertible with being, so is the true.
21 1, 16 | true that is in things is convertible with being ~as to substance;
22 1, 16 | that is in the intellect is convertible ~with being, as the manifestation
23 1, 16 | the good and the true are convertible with ~being, as to suppositum,
24 1, 16 | The true and being are convertible terms. Hence just as ~being
25 1, 17 | good are universals, and convertible with being. Hence, as every ~
26 1, 30 | is predicated, as "one" convertible with "being" is ~related
27 1, 48 | being" and "thing" are convertible. If therefore evil ~is a
28 1, 48 | and in that sense it is ~convertible with thing, and thus no
29 1, 51 | involves the taking of food convertible into the substance ~of the
30 1, 54 | good"; each of which is convertible with being; ~and so, to
31 1, 59 | and the true are really convertible, it ~follows that the good
32 1, 49 | being" and "thing" are convertible. If therefore evil ~is a
33 1, 49 | and in that sense it is ~convertible with thing, and thus no
34 1, 52 | involves the taking of food convertible into the substance ~of the
35 1, 55 | good"; each of which is convertible with being; ~and so, to
36 1, 60 | and the true are really convertible, it ~follows that the good
37 2, 8 | Further, good and being are convertible. But volition is directed ~
38 2, 18 | since ~good and being are convertible, as was stated in the FP,
39 2, 18 | Since good and being are convertible; according as being ~is
40 2, 26 | being; so, because good is convertible with being, ~the good, which
41 2, 29 | good, true, ~and being are convertible. But a man cannot hate good.
42 2, 54 | OBJ 2: Further, good is convertible with being; so that, since
43 2, 55 | than quality, since ~it is convertible with being. Therefore "good"
44 2, 55 | and as good, which are convertible with being. ~Wherefore we
45 2, 55 | good ~in general which is convertible with being, and which extends
46 2, 9 | Logic. For in the genus of convertible terms, ~that which signifies "
47 2, 9 | of ~"definition," but the convertible terms which fall short of
48 2, 48 | prudence, even ~as in logic a convertible term which does not denote
49 2, 107 | the true and the ~good are convertible. Now goodness is not a special
50 2, 107 | The true and the good are convertible as to subject, since ~every
51 2, 142 | honest and the virtuous are convertible according to Tully (De Offic.
52 2, 187 | one by the other is ~not convertible" [*Categor. ix], since whoever
53 3, 10 | since being and truth are ~convertible. Now a thing is said to
54 3, 17 | one, for one and being are convertible. Therefore, if there were
55 3, 60 | contrary, A definition is convertible with the thing defined.
56 Suppl, 42| thing defined should be convertible. Now ~causality of grace
|