Part, Question
1 1, 2 | ignorant of, such as being and non-being, whole and part, and such ~
2 1, 3 | distinct from being; for ~non-being cannot be a difference.
3 1, 5 | privation, said that ~matter was non-being, goodness is more extensively
4 1, 5 | since it is ~presumed to be non-being. Therefore Dionysius says
5 1, 5 | 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Non-being is desirable, not of itself,
6 1, 5 | can only be ~removed by non-being, is desirable. Now the removal
7 1, 5 | desirable of itself; and non-being only relatively, ~inasmuch
8 1, 5 | be ~deprived; thus even non-being can be spoken of as relatively
9 1, 5 | matter ~may be said to be a non-being on account of the privation
10 1, 9 | them is consistent ~with non-being. Hence, in the inferior
11 1, 11 | is some good thing, and non-being ~is some kind of being.
12 1, 11 | being (as a potentiality) is non-being absolutely, i.e. ~actually;
13 1, 11 | the genus of substance is ~non-being relatively as regards some
14 1, 13 | relations ~between "being" and "non-being" formed by reason, apprehending ~"
15 1, 13 | by reason, apprehending ~"non-being" as an extreme. The same
16 1, 17 | that are is found a certain non-being, so in things ~that are
17 1, 25 | the idea of being except non-being. Therefore, ~that which
18 1, 25 | which implies being and non-being at the same time is repugnant
19 1, 48 | whereas good is a being. But ~"non-being" does not require being
20 1, 49 | whereas good is a being. But ~"non-being" does not require being
21 2, 18 | called a being simply, and a non-being ~in a certain respect, as
22 2, 18 | is a privation, it is a non-being. But ~non-being cannot be
23 2, 18 | it is a non-being. But ~non-being cannot be a difference,
24 2, 54 | it is a privation ~and a non-being, cannot differentiate any
25 2, 64 | the other we have simply "non-being"; yet if we refer them to
26 2, 66 | the meaning of being and non-being, of whole ~and part, and
27 2, 72 | species nor ~difference of non-being," as the Philosopher states (
28 2, 76 | cause of sin: because a ~non-being is not the cause of anything.
29 2, 76 | anything. Now ignorance is a non-being, ~since it is a privation
30 2, 76 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Non-being cannot be the direct cause
31 2, 1 | can stand, as neither can non-being stand under ~being, nor
32 2, 18 | between a perfect being and a non-being, as stated in Metaph. ii,
33 2, 18 | differs ~altogether from non-being.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[19] A[
34 3, 50 | is change from being to non-being. Therefore, Christ's body, ~
35 3, 72 | consists in change from non-being to being. But this sacrament
36 3, 75 | which it is not said that non-being is converted into being.
37 3, 75 | creation there is being after non-being; in this sacrament, Christ'
38 3, 75 | and air into fire; whereas non-being is not converted ~into being.
39 3, 75 | tense: for ~we do not say, "Non-being is being" or, "Bread is
40 3, 75 | that "being is ~made out of non-being," and "out of bread, the
41 3, 75 | creation, so as to say that "non-being is converted into ~being":
42 3, 75 | be the other, as that ~"non-being can be being," or that "
43 3, 75 | being is made of ~[de] non-being," or that "the body of Christ
44 3, 75 | granted in creation that ~"non-being will be being," or that "
45 3, 75 | will be being," or that "non-being may become being," because ~
46 3, 77 | movement from being into non-being" ~(Aristotle, Phys. v).
47 3, 79 | transition from ~spiritual non-being into spiritual being, and
48 Suppl, 66| consequent upon being. Since then non-being does not cause plurality, ~
49 Suppl, 66| in being, the other in ~non-being, does not thereby become
|