Part, Question

 1   1, 36|   act through another, this ~preposition "through" points out, in
 2   1, 36|      which is covered by the preposition ~"through" is the cause
 3   1, 36|     which is covered by this preposition ~"through" is the cause
 4   1, 36|     sometimes said that this preposition "through" sometimes denotes
 5   1, 36|      the king, although this preposition ~"through" denotes a medium,
 6   1, 39|   Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: The preposition "from" or "out of" does
 7   1, 39|       and in Whom." For this preposition "from" [ex] sometimes implies
 8   1, 39|   the same way as power. The preposition "by" [per] sometimes ~designates
 9   1, 39|    expression "by Whom." The preposition "in" ~strictly denotes the
10   1, 41|     born of the Father, the ~preposition "of" designates a consubstantial
11   1, 41|       by ~observing that the preposition "of" [de] always denotes ~
12   1, 41| distinction signified by the preposition, so there is no ~parity
13   1, 43|      1 ~OBJ 2: Further, this preposition, "according to," denotes
14   1, 45|      1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the preposition "from" [ex] imports relation
15   1, 45|     made from nothing, this ~preposition "from" [ex] does not signify
16   1, 45|    must understand that this preposition "from" [ex] can ~comprise
17   1, 45|    the negation includes the preposition, then the order is denied, ~
18   1, 45|   But in the first way this ~preposition "from" [ex] implies order,
19   1, 45|      from ~another; for this preposition "through" usually denotes
20   1, 58|      of ~things, so that the preposition "in" denotes the form of
21   1, 39|   Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: The preposition "from" or "out of" does
22   1, 39|       and in Whom." For this preposition "from" [ex] sometimes implies
23   1, 39|   the same way as power. The preposition "by" [per] sometimes designates
24   1, 39|    expression "by Whom." The preposition "in" ~strictly denotes the
25   1, 41|     born of the Father, the ~preposition "of" designates a consubstantial
26   1, 41|       by ~observing that the preposition "of" [de] always denotes ~
27   1, 41| distinction signified by the preposition, so there is no ~parity
28   1, 43|      1 ~OBJ 2: Further, this preposition, "according to," denotes
29   1, 46|      1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the preposition "from" [ex] imports relation
30   1, 46|     made from nothing, this ~preposition "from" [ex] does not signify
31   1, 46|    must understand that this preposition "from" [ex] can ~comprise
32   1, 46|    the negation includes the preposition, then the order is denied, ~
33   1, 46|   But in the first way this ~preposition "from" [ex] implies order,
34   1, 46|      from ~another; for this preposition "through" usually denotes
35   1, 59|      of ~things, so that the preposition "in" denotes the form of
36   1, 92|      God's likeness; for the preposition "to" signifies a certain ~
37   1, 92|   ways: first, so that this ~preposition "to" points to the term
38   1, 92|     in him." Secondly, ~this preposition 'to' may point to the exemplar
39   2, 1 |    of his action; since this preposition ~"for" indicates a relation
40   2, 2 |   for anything else, if the ~preposition "for" denote the final cause.
41   2, 79|    to the souls of men," the preposition "to" ~does not denote causality
42   2, 26|       1/1~I answer that, The preposition "for" denotes a relation
43   3, 32|   efficient ~cause. And this preposition of [de] signifies both habitudes:
44   3, 58|     Father; yet so that this preposition "at," which is a transitive
45   3, 58|    and royal power. Now this preposition "at" signifies a kind ~of
46   3, 75|   all of them we can use the preposition "ex" [out of], ~which denotes
47   3, 75|     of bread," because ~this preposition "of" [de] denotes a consubstantial