|    Part, Question1   1, 1 |           but as regards the precise formality under which it is an object.
 2   1, 1 |             agree in the one precise formality of being ~colored; and color
 3   1, 1 |           things precisely under the formality of being ~divinely revealed,
 4   1, 1 |           possesses the one ~precise formality of the object of this science;
 5   1, 1 |        object in its ~more universal formality, as the object of the "common
 6   1, 4 |           cause: either in the same ~formality, if it is a univocal agent -
 7   1, 4 |          form ~according to the same formality, and according to the same
 8   1, 4 |           form according to the same formality, though not according ~to
 9   1, 4 |            not according to the same formality; as ~we see in non-univocal
10   1, 4 |          made, according to the same formality of the species; as man reproduces ~
11   1, 4 |             but not according to the formality of ~the same species; as
12   1, 4 |            same ~specific or generic formality, but only according to some
13   1, 4 |             in form according to the formality of the same genus or ~species,
14   1, 5 |          matter does not contain the formality of goodness. Therefore not
15   1, 5 |           thirdly, there follows the formality of goodness which is the
16   1, 5 |             according to its ~proper formality.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[5] A[6]
17   1, 5 |        pleasing which have no other ~formality under which they are desirable
18   1, 54| understanding according to the same ~formality. On this account it does
19   1, 55|        according to their own proper formality - because the angel's essence,
20   1, 55|             distinguished by its own formality from other ~things - but
21   1, 55|             according to some common formality. Yet all things are ~perfectly
22   1, 55|           and according to their own formality in God's essence, as in ~
23   1, 77|            regards a more universal ~formality of the object than the lower
24   1, 77|              are combined in the one formality of the object, which the
25   1, 55| understanding according to the same ~formality. On this account it does
26   1, 56|        according to their own proper formality - because the angel's essence,
27   1, 56|             distinguished by its own formality from other ~things - but
28   1, 56|             according to some common formality. Yet all things are ~perfectly
29   1, 56|           and according to their own formality in God's essence, as in ~
30   1, 76|            regards a more universal ~formality of the object than the lower
31   1, 76|              are combined in the one formality of the object, which the
32   1, 77|            on ~account of the common formality of its object: we must say
33   1, 77|             by reason of a different formality of ~immutation. For touch
34   1, 77|             otherwise. And ~the very formality of the past, which memory
35   2, 11|               but also the universal formality of the end and the ~good;
36   2, 31|           formal ~difference, if the formality of pleasurableness be different.
37   2, 93|            of ~divination. Where the formality of sin is the same, there
38   2, 93|             of sin. Now there is one formality of sin in ~all divinations,
39   2, 93|         divination takes its general formality. But the various ~species
40   3, 11|           knew everything under one ~formality, i.e. by a divinely infused
41   3, 11|          infused light is the common formality for ~understanding what
42   3, 46|           forgive sin, which has the formality of fault in that it is committed ~
43   3, 57|             first container has ~the formality of first place, and such
44   3, 57|             but not according to its formality of ~union.~Aquin.: SMT TP
45   3, 83|             to ~the memory under the formality of the past (De Mem. et
 
 |