Part, Question

 1   1, 37|       exception of the words ~"dilection" and "love," which express
 2   1, 37|       by the words "love" and "dilection": just as if ~we were to
 3   1, 60|     Para. 1/2 - OF THE LOVE OR DILECTION OF THE ANGELS (FIVE ARTICLES)~
 4   1, 60|     the will which is ~love or dilection; because every act of the
 5   1, 60|       there is natural love or dilection in an angel?~Aquin.: SMT
 6   1, 60|    there is no natural love or dilection in the ~angels. For, natural
 7   1, 37|       exception of the words ~"dilection" and "love," which express
 8   1, 37|       by the words "love" and "dilection": just as if ~we were to
 9   1, 61|     Para. 1/2 - OF THE LOVE OR DILECTION OF THE ANGELS (FIVE ARTICLES)~
10   1, 61|     the will which is ~love or dilection; because every act of the
11   1, 61|       there is natural love or dilection in an angel?~Aquin.: SMT
12   1, 61|    there is no natural love or dilection in the ~angels. For, natural
13   1, 92| thought; and by will, love, or dilection I mean that which ~unites
14   2, 26|    Whether love is the same as dilection?~(4) Whether love is properly
15   2, 26|    Whether love is the same as dilection?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[26] A[
16   2, 26|       that love is the same as dilection. For Dionysius ~says (Div.
17   2, 26|       Nom. iv) that love is to dilection, "as four is to twice two, ~
18   2, 26|    meaning. Therefore love and dilection denote the same ~thing.~
19   2, 26|    objects. But the objects of dilection and love are the same. Therefore ~
20   2, 26|         1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if dilection and love differ, it seems
21   2, 26|      chiefly in the fact that "dilection refers to good things, love
22   2, 26|     things. Therefore love and dilection do not differ: thus ~indeed
23   2, 26|        and another to speak of dilection."~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[26] A[
24   2, 26|    something more Godlike than dilection does."~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
25   2, 26|        same thing: ~viz. love, dilection, charity and friendship.
26   2, 26|    habit," whereas "love" and "dilection" are expressed by way of ~
27   2, 26|        the others, since every dilection or charity is love, ~but
28   2, 26|        not vice versa. Because dilection implies, in addition to
29   2, 26|        denotes: and ~therefore dilection is not in the concupiscible
30   2, 26|        is speaking of love and dilection, in so far as ~they are
31   2, 26|      thus love is the same as ~dilection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[26] A[
32   2, 26|    general than the object of ~dilection: because love extends to
33   2, 26|      love extends to more than dilection does, as stated ~above.~
34   2, 26|        1~Reply OBJ 3: Love and dilection differ, not in respect of
35   2, 26|   faculty love is the same as ~dilection. And it is in this sense
36   2, 26|  something more Godlike than ~"dilection," was because love denotes
37   2, 26|    sensitive appetite; whereas dilection presupposes the ~judgment
38   2, 26|      pertains to the nature of dilection, ~as stated above. And consequently
39   2, 26|      love is more Godlike than dilection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[26] A[
40   2, 23|        is for all an object of dilection and love." ~Therefore charity
41   2, 26|    includes goodwill, but such dilection or love adds union of ~affections,
42   2, 32|      is an object of love and ~dilection to all." But God is goodness
43   2, 42|    since good is the object of dilection and ~love, and since good
44   3, 66|    highest degree of fervor of dilection and love, according to Jn.