Part, Question
1 1, 14| either as regards truth and falsity, for example, if when either ~
2 1, 14| either ~as regards truth and falsity, for example, if when a
3 1, 16| intellect changes from truth to falsity, for thus forms may be called ~
4 1, 17| Para. 1/1 - CONCERNING FALSITY (FOUR ARTICLES)~We next
5 1, 17| ARTICLES)~We next consider falsity. About this four points
6 1, 17| inquiry arise:~(1) Whether falsity exists in things?~(2) Whether
7 1, 17| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether falsity exists in things?~Aquin.:
8 1, 17| 1~OBJ 1: It appears that falsity does not exist in things.
9 1, 17| true without admixture ~of falsity; and thus nothing is false.~
10 1, 17| Therefore ~in all things falsity exists.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
11 1, 17| thing, we must needs seek falsity, where ~primarily we find
12 1, 17| things, neither truth nor falsity exists, except in relation
13 1, 17| For they give occasion to falsity, by the likeness they bear
14 1, 17| not involve the idea of falsity except in so far as ~it
15 1, 17| Para. 1/1~Whether there is falsity in the senses?~Aquin.: SMT
16 1, 17| 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that falsity is not in the senses. For
17 1, 17| senses; and therefore that falsity ~is not in them.~Aquin.:
18 1, 17| says (Metaph. iv, 24) that falsity is ~not proper to the senses,
19 1, 17| in the senses there is no falsity.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[17] A[
20 1, 17| Para. 1/3~I answer that, Falsity is not to be sought in the
21 1, 17| and hence it happens that falsity exists ~in the senses through
22 1, 17| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Falsity is said not to be proper
23 1, 17| object, is never false." ~Falsity is attributed to the imagination,
24 1, 17| it were the thing itself, falsity results from ~such an apprehension;
25 1, 17| Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether falsity is in the intellect?~Aquin.:
26 1, 17| 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that falsity is not in the intellect.
27 1, 17| which he is deceived." But falsity is said to exist in any
28 1, 17| deceived therein. Therefore falsity does not exist in ~the intellect.~
29 1, 17| right. Therefore there is no falsity in the intellect.~Aquin.:
30 1, 17| truth (Q[16], A[2]), that falsity can exist in ~the intellect
31 1, 17| truth; whereas in sense falsity does not ~exist as known,
32 1, 17| Body Para. 2/2~But because falsity of the intellect is concerned
33 1, 17| composition of the intellect, falsity occurs also accidentally
34 1, 17| demonstrations, in which there is no falsity. In this sense Augustine'
35 1, 17| is not in the other. But falsity ~is in truth, because, as
36 1, 17| De Civ. Dei xii, 2). But ~falsity is opposed to God, for an
37 1, 17| blackness is a species of color. Falsity ~asserts something, for
38 1, 17| apprehension of a thing, so falsity implies the contrary. Hence
39 1, 17| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Falsity is not founded in the truth
40 1, 17| in some good, and every falsity in some truth.~Aquin.: SMT
41 1, 60| A[5] Body Para. 2/3~The falsity of such an opinion stands
42 1, 61| A[5] Body Para. 2/3~The falsity of such an opinion stands
|