Part, Question
1 1, 8 | the divine being is not successive but permanent. Therefore
2 1, 10 | time itself, which ~is successive; and the "now" of time,
3 1, 10 | Spiritual creatures as regards successive affections and ~intelligences
4 1, 42 | imperfect, as appears in successive things, which are ~always
5 1, 42 | principle when the ~action is successive. So, given that an agent,
6 1, 42 | produces the ~Son is not successive, because thus the Son would
7 1, 42 | arrived at perfection in a successive ~manner and by change. Therefore
8 1, 46 | is instantaneous and not successive, it is not necessary ~for
9 1, 46 | produced the world, is ~not a successive change, as was said above (
10 1, 66 | through the disappearance of successive ~forms - that is to say,
11 1, 67 | further ~distinction into successive days, seasons, and years
12 1, 42 | imperfect, as appears in successive things, which are ~always
13 1, 42 | principle when the ~action is successive. So, given that an agent,
14 1, 42 | produces the ~Son is not successive, because thus the Son would
15 1, 42 | arrived at perfection in a successive ~manner and by change. Therefore
16 1, 47 | is instantaneous and not successive, it is not necessary ~for
17 1, 47 | produced the world, is ~not a successive change, as was said above (
18 1, 67 | through the disappearance of successive ~forms - that is to say,
19 1, 68 | further ~distinction into successive days, seasons, and years
20 1, 85 | understood ~except by a successive consideration of one part
21 2, 30 | nature there is ~potential successive infinity, so can this kind
22 2, 31 | since time is the measure of successive things, those things are
23 2, 31 | are subject to something successive. Thus the ~fact of being
24 2, 31 | not essentially something successive; since it is ~not a movement,
25 2, 31 | such": this movement is successive and is in time. ~Another
26 2, 31 | delight. This movement is not successive, nor is it of ~itself in
27 2, 113 | ungodly would seem to be successive.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[113] A[
28 2, 113 | Hence they must be two successive instants; between which
29 2, 113 | justification of the ungodly is not successive, but instantaneous.~Aquin.:
30 2, 113 | the ~free-will - are not successive, but instantaneous. Hence
31 2, 113 | the ungodly must not be successive.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[113] A[
32 2, 113 | justification of the ~ungodly is not successive, as stated above (A[7]);
33 2, 184 | is not ~simultaneous but successive. Hence a man cannot give
34 3, 75 | cannot be instantaneous, but successive.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[75] A[
35 3, 75 | time is not made up ~of successive instants, as is proved in
36 3, 75 | follow that this change is ~successive.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[75] A[
37 3, 78 | such ~conversion is not successive, as was said above (Q[75],
38 3, 85 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: In successive movements withdrawal from
39 Suppl, 66| consists in having ~two successive wives?~(2) Whether irregularity
40 Suppl, 66| the multitude of several ~successive wives is a multitude relatively,
41 Suppl, 72| is nothing else than the successive ~movements whereby they
|