Part, Question

 1   1, 7   |       circular body: for if two ~lines be drawn from the centre,
 2   1, 7   |         body were infinite, ~the lines would be infinitely distant
 3   1, 14  |       itself, ~it would know all lines that proceed from the centre;
 4   1, 14  |   likewise, the diversity of the lines is ~caused by their different
 5   1, 14  |       circle) to the (radiating) lines; but as ~perfect acts to
 6   1, 88  | diversified, as is the case with lines radiating ~from the centre
 7   2, 26  |         one composed of straight lines." But ~these have the same
 8   2, 30  |          addition of numbers and lines. Consequently, the infinite,
 9   2, 23  |         resulting from those two lines, viz. the one from which
10   2, 93  |         taken from observing the lines of ~the hand is called "
11   3, 10  |         were to suppose ~several lines of infinite length drawn
12   3, 10  |        any one of other infinite lines, it is plain that each has
13   3, 75  |      time measuring; as when two lines touch, there are two points
14   3, 75  |          on the part ~of the two lines, but one point on the part
15   3, 77  |          we ~can imagine several lines of the same species, differing
16 Suppl, 9 |       contained in the following lines, are not requisite for confession:~
17 Suppl, 54|     distinguished by degrees and lines?~(3) Whether certain degrees
18 Suppl, 54|     distinguished by degrees and lines?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[54] A[
19 Suppl, 54|    distinguished by ~degrees and lines. For a line of consanguinity
20 Suppl, 54|     fittingly distinguished into lines.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[54] A[
21 Suppl, 54|        descending and collateral lines.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[54] A[
22 Suppl, 54|      should not be divided ~into lines and degrees.~Aquin.: SMT
23 Suppl, 54|    relationships there are three lines of ~consanguinity, namely
24 Suppl, 54|          the degrees in various ~lines. For the degree of consanguinity
25 Suppl, 54|    persons who are in collateral lines is contracted not through
26 Suppl, 54|         divided, and becomes two lines. But ~sometimes a line designates
27 Suppl, 54|         ascending and descending lines: ~since in the Old Law a
28 Suppl, 80|           as in the ~case of two lines touching one another, and
29 Suppl, 80|    touching one another, and two lines when two surfaces ~are in
30 Suppl, 80|   supposing there to be two such lines, or two parts of one line,
31 Suppl, 80|  impossible for there to ~be two lines, or two parts of a line,
32 Suppl, 80|      have one term, even ~as two lines terminate in one point.
33 Suppl, 80|      there would be two straight lines corresponding to the two ~
34 Suppl, 80|          no distinction ~between lines save in respect of a different
35 Suppl, 80|      understand a distinction of lines; ~and these are not distant
36 Suppl, 80|      points, ~and thus different lines described on two bodies
37 Suppl, 81|        point at which different ~lines terminate. But this is not
38 Suppl, 81|        as the ~proportion of the lines to which an addition has
39 Suppl, 81|      which is ~not the case with lines: and consequently the retardation
40 Suppl, 81|      whereas in the case of the ~lines that which is added is a