|    Part, Question1   1, 1   |         As other sciences do not argue in proof of their ~principles,
 2   1, 1   |        of their ~principles, but argue from their principles to
 3   1, 1   |        so this doctrine does not argue in proof of its ~principles,
 4   1, 1   |         revelation; ~thus we can argue with heretics from texts
 5   1, 1   |         article of faith, we can argue from another. If our ~opponent
 6   1, 2   |          priori," and this is to argue from what is prior ~absolutely.
 7   1, 2   |          posteriori"; this is to argue from what is prior ~relatively
 8   1, 16  |         by law. Hence we ~cannot argue from these particular truths
 9   1, 16  |       entirely ~from God. But to argue, "Therefore that this person
10   1, 29  |        had still more ~reason to argue. Seeing this, others maintained
11   1, 42  |        Father has; but we cannot argue - "the Father has paternity, ~
12   1, 42  |        the Son can beget; for to argue thus would imply transition
13   1, 59  |        it. Therefore it does not argue imperfection in an ~angel
14   1, 59  |       beneath him; ~but it would argue imperfection in him, with
15   1, 60  |         Consequently it does not argue imperfection ~in the person
16   1, 42  |        Father has; but we cannot argue - "the Father has paternity, ~
17   1, 42  |        the Son can beget; for to argue thus ~would imply transition
18   1, 60  |        it. Therefore it does not argue imperfection in an ~angel
19   1, 60  |       beneath him; ~but it would argue imperfection in him, with
20   1, 61  |         Consequently it does not argue imperfection ~in the person
21   1, 83  |        like; thus does Aristotle argue ~against Empedocles (De
22   1, 88  |         itself. Hence ~we cannot argue from distance of time to
23   2, 58  |         which reason proceeds to argue. And when reason argues ~
24   2, 63  |    Objections. For the first two argue ~about the nurseries of
25   2, 85  |       The first three objections argue on the side of the matter;
26   2, 85  |           while the ~other three argue on the side of the form.
27   2, 8   | Objections: for the first three ~argue in reference to perfect
28   2, 47  |         OBJ 3: It behooves us to argue, as it were, about the future
29   2, 121 |          act on another seems to argue greater ~power than not
30   2, 165 |        heavens about ~which they argue." In like manner, those
31   2, 187 |          tongue, about whom you ~argue, saying; 'If all shut themselves
32   3, 16  |      this word "begin" we cannot argue from the lower ~species
33   3, 45  |        and whiteness of garments argue not a ~change of substance,
34   3, 54  |           ccxlvii) that some men argue in this fashion: "If ~it
35   3, 61  |     alteration." But it seems to argue some change in the ~Divine
36   3, 66  |          Holy Ghost." Nor can we argue from the form to the use
37 Suppl, 13|           as some maintain, ~who argue that a man profits more
38 Suppl, 88|       the other objections which argue in the contrary sense, namely ~
39 Suppl, 92|       every respect, we must not argue that one thing is ~not to
40 Suppl, 94|           the differences do not argue a difference of species
 
 |