|    Part, Question1   3, 60  |     words, nor ~consequently the validity of the sacrament. Thus in
 2   3, 60  | destroyed, and consequently, the validity of the sacrament. But this
 3   3, 64  |    intention is required for the validity of a ~sacrament?~Aquin.:
 4   3, 64  |         is not required for the ~validity of a sacrament. For the
 5   3, 64  |  intention were required for the validity of a ~sacrament, he who
 6   3, 64  |       that this suffices for the validity of the sacrament, ~except
 7   3, 64  |           which suffices for the validity ~of the sacrament; for instance
 8   3, 64  |   minister is ~necessary for the validity of a sacrament. But "faith
 9   3, 64  |           Wherefore, just as the validity of a sacrament does not
10   3, 64  |      Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the validity of a sacrament requires
11   3, 64  |         OBJ 1: It seems that the validity of a sacrament requires
12   3, 64  |       always good. Therefore the validity of ~a sacrament requires
13   3, 64  |         intention both as to the validity of ~the sacrament and as
14   3, 64  |     intention, necessary for the validity of a sacrament. Consequently, ~
15   3, 66  |    sensible form. Hence, for the validity of the sacrament it is not ~
16   3, 70  |        was not necessary for the validity of the ~sacrament: because
17 Suppl, 35|         is prerequisite for ~the validity of the sacrament, and something
18 Suppl, 35|          the ~sacrament. For the validity of the sacrament it is required
19 Suppl, 35|         is ~prerequisite for the validity of the sacrament, so that
20 Suppl, 39|      Orders, albeit not ~for the validity of the sacrament. But the
21 Suppl, 39|          being requisite for the validity of the sacrament, and if ~
22 Suppl, 39|       are required, not for ~the validity of the sacrament, but for
23 Suppl, 39|       lawfulness and not for the validity of the sacrament, ~because
24 Suppl, 39|          is not required for the validity of ~the sacrament, but some
25 Suppl, 39|          lawfulness, nor for its validity. Hence some can without
26 Suppl, 39|      reason is necessary for the validity of episcopal consecration. ~
27 Suppl, 39|     reason is necessary for the ~validity of the sacrament in all
28 Suppl, 39|    sacrament is required for its validity.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[39] A[
29 Suppl, 39|         is an impediment to the ~validity of the sacrament. For a
30 Suppl, 39|         is not required for the ~validity of the sacrament, although
31 Suppl, 39|    without reproach, not for the validity but for the ~lawfulness
32 Suppl, 39|       lawfulness and not for the validity of the sacrament.~Aquin.:
33 Suppl, 40|   anything else required for the validity of the sacrament; ~although,
34 Suppl, 40|  preceding order as ~regards the validity of the sacrament. But the
35 Suppl, 50|        do not derogate from the ~validity of the marriage. These impediments
36 Suppl, 52|     subject, it follows that the validity or ~invalidity of a marriage
37 Suppl, 68|         impediment affecting its validity; which impediment may be
 
 |