Part, Question

 1   1, 3 |    concrete nouns to signify His subsistence, ~because with us only those
 2   1, 13|  concrete sense, to signify His ~subsistence and perfection, so likewise
 3   1, 28|     would not ~in that case be a subsistence. But as the perfection of
 4   1, 29| comparison of person to essence, subsistence, and hypostasis.~(3) Whether
 5   1, 29|    person to signify the mode of subsistence which belongs to ~particular
 6   1, 29|          the same as hypostasis, subsistence, and essence?~Aquin.: SMT
 7   1, 29|          same as "hypostasis," ~"subsistence," and "essence." For Boethius
 8   1, 29|      implies that "person" and ~"subsistence" have the same meaning.
 9   1, 29|          Therefore "person" and "subsistence" ~mean the same.~Aquin.:
10   1, 29|     called {ousiosis} - that is, subsistence. But ~neither form nor matter
11   1, 29|        is, "a thing of nature," "subsistence," and ~"hypostasis," according
12   1, 29|          another, it is called ~"subsistence"; as we say that those things
13   1, 29|       thought preferable to use "subsistence" for ~hypostasis, rather
14   1, 29|       matter, and {ousiosis}, or subsistence, to the form, ~because the
15   1, 29|         of dignity." And because subsistence in a ~rational nature is
16   1, 29|          imposed to signify the ~subsistence. Jerome said that "poison
17   1, 32|        whereas, to express their subsistence and completeness, we ~use
18   1, 33|         nature the word is not a subsistence, and hence is ~not properly
19   1, 42|         but the accident has no ~subsistence. The sixth is the abstraction
20   1, 75|      Whether the human soul is a subsistence?~(3) Whether the souls of
21   1, 42|         but the accident has no ~subsistence. The sixth is the abstraction
22   1, 74|      Whether the human soul is a subsistence?~(3) Whether the souls of
23   3, 2 |       human natures (a union in ~subsistence having taken place) one
24   3, 2 |          no augment of person or subsistence." Now "subsistence" ~is
25   3, 2 |     person or subsistence." Now "subsistence" ~is the same as the subsisting
26   3, 2 |          was united to flesh in ~subsistence, and that Christ with His
27   3, 2 |         are different aspects of subsistence, and hence He is ~said to
28   3, 2 |    accidental, but midway, in a ~subsistence or hypostasis. Hence in
29   3, 2 |        composition, which is ~in subsistence." Therefore it is plain
30   3, 2 |    habitual grace alone, but in ~subsistence or person.~Aquin.: SMT TP
31   3, 3 |         not accidentally, but in subsistence.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[1]
32   3, 3 |          nature by reason of Its subsistence or ~Personality.~Aquin.:
33   3, 6 |         soul once had its proper subsistence without the Word; and ~thus,
34   3, 6 |       did not take ~place in the subsistence, or the pre-existing subsistence
35   3, 6 | subsistence, or the pre-existing subsistence of the soul was ~corrupted.
36   3, 6 |        nature took ~place in the subsistence, and not accidentally, as