Part, Question

 1   3, 82  |          without doubt to have a concubine." Moreover, ~Gregory says (
 2 Suppl, 65|        the natural law to have a concubine?~(4) Whether it is a mortal
 3 Suppl, 65|          have intercourse with a concubine?~(5) Whether it was ever
 4 Suppl, 65|        was ever lawful to have a concubine?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
 5 Suppl, 65|        the natural law to have a concubine?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
 6 Suppl, 65|        would seem that to have a concubine is not against the natural ~
 7 Suppl, 65|     which ~is intercourse with a concubine is not against the natural
 8 Suppl, 65|       the natural law to have a ~concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
 9 Suppl, 65|        the natural law to have a concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
10 Suppl, 65|      laws the children born of a concubine ~are children of shame.
11 Suppl, 65|       the ~natural law to have a concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
12 Suppl, 65|         marriage, so the name of concubine is expressive of that union ~
13 Suppl, 65|          the ~signification of a concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
14 Suppl, 65|         have intercourse ~with a concubine, and in many cases practiced
15 Suppl, 65|          his that she may be his concubine. And again it ~depends how
16 Suppl, 65|          have intercourse with a concubine?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
17 Suppl, 65|         have intercourse ~with a concubine. For a lie is a greater
18 Suppl, 65|         death intercourse with a concubine, save in a ~certain case (
19 Suppl, 65|        was ever lawful to have a concubine?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
20 Suppl, 65|      sometimes lawful to have a ~concubine. For just as the natural
21 Suppl, 65|          it forbid him to have a concubine. Yet at times it has been ~
22 Suppl, 65|      also been lawful to have ~a concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
23 Suppl, 65|        sometime lawful to have a concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
24 Suppl, 65|      never lawful. Now to have a concubine is against a precept of
25 Suppl, 65|         for a husband to have a ~concubine.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[65] A[
26 Suppl, 65|        the natural law to have a concubine outside ~wedlock, as stated
27 Suppl, 65|  something of the character of a concubine. In so far as marriage ~
28 Suppl, 65|         law, as it is to have a ~concubine; wherefore the argument
29 Suppl, 66|      first united to Christ as a concubine; so that the sacrament loses ~
30 Suppl, 66|     bridegroom previously had a ~concubine. But this is most absurd,
31 Suppl, 66|         so that she was not as a concubine but as a wife. ~Again, according
32 Suppl, 67|      Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, a concubine differs from a wife especially
33 Suppl, 67| dispensation could a man ~have a concubine. Therefore by no dispensation
34 Suppl, 67|         1~Reply OBJ 2: To have a concubine is contrary to the good
35 Suppl, 67|          is not the ~case with a concubine, since she is taken for
36 Suppl, 67| intention, even the ~having of a concubine may be a matter of dispensation