|    Part, Question1   1, 16|     resides only in the intellect composing and dividing?~(3) On the
 2   1, 16|     resides only in the intellect composing and dividing?~Aquin.: SMT
 3   1, 16|     reside only in the intellect ~composing and dividing. For the Philosopher
 4   1, 16|     reside only in the intellect ~composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
 5   1, 16|      reside only in the intellect composing and ~dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
 6   1, 16|  expresses truth. This it does by composing and dividing: for in every ~
 7   1, 16|         resides ~in the intellect composing and dividing; and not in
 8   1, 16|        the true in the intellect ~composing and dividing as said above (
 9   1, 16|        consists in the ~intellect composing and dividing. But in God
10   1, 17|      another. In another ~way, by composing a definition of parts which
11   1, 58|         Whether he understands by composing and dividing?~(5) Whether
12   1, 58|          the angels understand by composing and dividing?~Aquin.: SMT
13   1, 58|          the angels understand by composing and ~dividing. For, where
14   1, 58|      seems that he understands by composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
15   1, 58|         the angel ~understands by composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
16   1, 58|    principle, so in the intellect composing and dividing, ~the predicate
17   1, 58|         would never understand by composing and dividing, but only by ~
18   1, 58| understands by discursion, and by composing and ~dividing, namely, that
19   1, 58|  reasoning, so neither does he by composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
20   1, 58|         all that we can learn by ~composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
21   1, 58|        yet not that ~they know by composing and dividing, but by knowing
22   1, 58|         angel understands not by ~composing and dividing, but by understanding
23   1, 58|          quiddity of a thing by a composing and dividing process, as
24   1, 59|         Whether he understands by composing and dividing?~(5) Whether
25   1, 59|          the angels understand by composing and dividing?~Aquin.: SMT
26   1, 59|          the angels understand by composing and ~dividing. For, where
27   1, 59|      seems that he understands by composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
28   1, 59|         the angel ~understands by composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
29   1, 59|    principle, so in the intellect composing and dividing, ~the predicate
30   1, 59|         would never understand by composing and dividing, but only by ~
31   1, 59| understands by discursion, and by composing and ~dividing, namely, that
32   1, 59|  reasoning, so neither does he by composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
33   1, 59|         all that we can learn by ~composing and dividing.~Aquin.: SMT
34   1, 59|        yet not that ~they know by composing and dividing, but by knowing
35   1, 59|         angel understands not by ~composing and dividing, but by understanding
36   1, 59|          quiddity of a thing by a composing and dividing process, as
 
 |