Part, Question
1 1, 5 | subsisted; but they have only ~logical existence, inasmuch as they
2 1, 5 | there should be in ~some logical entity neither goodness
3 1, 13 | that a relation is real or ~logical. Sometimes from both extremes
4 1, 16 | as not-being is a kind of logical being, ~apprehended, that
5 1, 28 | of this kind is only a ~logical one; for every real relation
6 1, 28 | real relation, but only a logical one. Therefore paternity
7 1, 28 | operation of the intellect are ~logical relations. Therefore paternity
8 1, 28 | upon generation, are only logical relations.~Aquin.: SMT FP
9 1, 28 | another, and this is a ~logical relation only; as, for instance,
10 1, 28 | the term "the same" is a logical ~relation only, if in regard
11 1, 28 | the objects understood are logical relations only, inasmuch
12 1, 28 | whence it proceeds, are not logical relations only, but are
13 1, 28 | the identity be real and logical; as, for ~instance, a tunic
14 1, 28 | relations; but ~are only logical relations (Q[42], A[3],
15 1, 30 | Although this community is logical and not real, yet it ~does
16 1, 32 | admitting ~in God, many logical relations. But in the Father
17 1, 48 | Aristotle, especially in his logical works, brings forward examples
18 1, 76 | proceeding from the various logical notions or intentions, which
19 1, 76 | whole which is divided into logical and essential ~parts: as
20 1, 76 | totality, which depends on logical ~and essential perfection,
21 1, 49 | Aristotle, especially in his logical works, brings forward examples
22 1, 75 | proceeding from the various logical notions or intentions, which
23 1, 75 | whole which is divided into logical and essential ~parts: as
24 1, 75 | totality, which depends on logical ~and essential perfection,
25 1, 84 | before its division into logical parts, as we have said above ~(
26 1, 86 | Wherefore although there is a logical distinction between the ~
27 1, 87 | they belong to the same logical genus, because even ~immaterial
28 1, 87 | either natural genus or logical genus; ~because God is in
29 2, 60 | just as there is only a logical difference between a virtue
30 2, 23 | the distinction, at least logical, of the one ~charity from
31 2, 79 | from one ~another. Now a logical difference in the object
32 2, 109 | There is, however, a mere logical difference between them,
33 2, 139 | moral virtue. Yet there is a logical difference between temperance ~
34 Suppl, 17| and that there is only a logical difference, according ~as
35 Suppl, 93| aureole would ~only imply a logical difference: and this cannot
|