Part, Question

 1   1, 16 |        which extends to being and not-being is not ~convertible with
 2   1, 16 |         true extends to being and not-being; for ~it is true that what
 3   1, 16 |          2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Not-being has nothing in itself whereby
 4   1, 16 |       based on being, inasmuch as not-being is a kind of logical being, ~
 5   1, 16 |          3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Not-being and privation have no truth
 6   1, 16 |          this is truth concerning not-being; and not-being has not truth
 7   1, 16 |         concerning not-being; and not-being has not truth of ~itself,
 8   1, 16 |           far as we apprehend its not-being ~as preceding its being.~
 9   1, 17 |  therefore be said of being as of not-being, for instance ~not-seeing
10   1, 17 |          To ~apprehend being, and not-being, implies contrariety; for,
11   1, 45 | generation of a man is from the ~"not-being" which is "not-man," so
12   1, 45 |           all being, is from the "not-being" which is "nothing."~Aquin.:
13   1, 45 |        term "wherefrom" is simply not-being.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[
14   1, 48 |         of something, that ~is a "not-being." But Dionysius says (Div.
15   1, 48 |           being and from simple ~"not-being," because it is neither
16   1, 48 |           Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: "Not-being," understood negatively,
17   1, 48 |            iv, text 4), and such "not-being" is an evil.~Aquin.: SMT
18   1, 49 |           the cause of tending to not-being."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[49] A[
19   1, 63 |        would be desiring his own 'not-being'; since no creature can
20   1, 46 | generation of a man is from the ~"not-being" which is "not-man," so
21   1, 46 |           all being, is from the "not-being" which is "nothing."~Aquin.:
22   1, 46 |        term "wherefrom" is simply not-being.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[45] A[
23   1, 49 |         of something, that ~is a "not-being." But Dionysius says (Div.
24   1, 49 |           being and from simple ~"not-being," because it is neither
25   1, 49 |           Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: "Not-being," understood negatively,
26   1, 49 |            iv, text 4), and such "not-being" is an evil.~Aquin.: SMT
27   1, 50 |           the cause of tending to not-being."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[49] A[
28   1, 64 |        would be desiring his own 'not-being'; since no creature can
29   1, 103|        can be no ~potentiality to not-being, either in the form which
30   1, 103|          thereof. But tendency to not-being is unnatural and violent
31   1, 103|          no ~creature can tend to not-being, except through some active
32   1, 103|          creatures cannot tend to not-being, even if God were to ~withdraw
33   1, 103|    Wherefore the ~potentiality to not-being in spiritual creatures and
34   2, 94 |        the notion of "being" and "not-being": and on this principle