Part, Question
1 1, 5 | desirable; whereas to some non-existence is desirable; for it ~is
2 1, 5 | that "goodness extends ~to non-existence" (Div. Nom. v).~Aquin.:
3 1, 5 | cause ~them - if, indeed, by non-existence we understand not simply
4 1, 9 | reducible from existence ~to non-existence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[9] A[2]
5 1, 9 | itself there is no power to non-existence; and so these kinds ~of
6 1, 9 | power is their existence and non-existence. Hence since God is in none
7 1, 10 | since the existence and non-existence of an angel considered absolutely
8 1, 21 | change of creatures from ~non-existence to existence.~
9 1, 27 | generation is change from non-existence to existence, and is opposed ~
10 1, 27 | nothing but change from non-existence to existence. ~In another
11 1, 45 | is now and its previous non-existence. ~But if the negation includes
12 1, 46 | results from a form, and to ~non-existence, which results from privation
13 1, 48 | and even more distant from non-existence." Therefore evil ~is not
14 1, 50 | because God can reduce it to non-existence, by withdrawing His act
15 1, 61 | his existence after his non-existence, and which is ~also the
16 1, 75 | creature a potentiality to ~non-existence, but in the Creator the
17 1, 75 | in it a ~potentiality to non-existence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[75] A[
18 1, 77 | existence in a subject, and non-existence in a subject. In this sense, ~
19 1, 46 | is now and its previous non-existence. ~But if the negation includes
20 1, 47 | results from a form, and to ~non-existence, which results from privation
21 1, 49 | and even more distant from non-existence." Therefore evil ~is not
22 1, 51 | because God can reduce it to non-existence, by withdrawing His act
23 1, 62 | his existence after his non-existence, and which is ~also the
24 1, 74 | creature a potentiality to ~non-existence, but in the Creator the
25 1, 74 | in it a ~potentiality to non-existence.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[75] A[
26 1, 76 | existence in a subject, and non-existence in a subject. In this sense, ~
27 1, 103 | of anything tending to ~non-existence." But He would be such a
28 1, 103 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Non-existence has no direct cause; for
29 1, 103 | cause a thing to tend ~to non-existence, whereas a creature has
30 1, 103 | things being reduced to non-existence, by withdrawing His action ~
31 1, 103 | have no potentiality to ~non-existence; or they are material, and
32 1, 103 | existence from a state of ~non-existence, clearly shows the power
33 2, 109 | itself it can fall ~into non-existence, unless it is upheld by
34 Suppl, 95| 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Non-existence is eligible, not in itself,
|