Part, Question

 1   2, 118|       120] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF "EPIKEIA" OR EQUITY (TWO ARTICLES)~
 2   2, 118| ARTICLES)~We must now consider "epikeia," under which head there
 3   2, 118|       of ~inquiry:~(1) Whether "epikeia" is a virtue?~(2) Whether
 4   2, 118|        Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether "epikeia" [*{epieikeia}] is a virtue?~
 5   2, 118|         1~OBJ 1: It seems that "epikeia" is not a virtue. For no
 6   2, 118|       with another virtue. Yet "epikeia" does away with another
 7   2, 118|         to severity. Therefore "epikeia" is not a virtue.~Aquin.:
 8   2, 118|       to them." But seemingly ~"epikeia" pronounces judgment on
 9   2, 118|     particular case. Therefore "epikeia" is a ~vice rather than
10   2, 118|       apparently it belongs to "epikeia" to consider the ~intention
11   2, 118|           Therefore the act of "epikeia" ~is unlawful: and consequently "
12   2, 118|     unlawful: and consequently "epikeia" is not a virtue.~Aquin.:
13   2, 118|          This is the object of "epikeia" which we call equity. ~
14   2, 118|   Therefore it is evident that "epikeia" is a virtue.~Aquin.: SMT
15   2, 118|         Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: "Epikeia" does not set aside that
16   2, 118|        Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether "epikeia" is a part of justice?~Aquin.:
17   2, 118|         1~OBJ 1: It seems that "epikeia" is not a part of justice.
18   2, 118|     particular and legal. Now ~"epikeia" is not a part of particular
19   2, 118|        Therefore it seems that "epikeia" is not a part of justice.~
20   2, 118|         assigned as parts. Now "epikeia" ~seems to be a more principal
21   2, 118|        i.e. "just." ~Therefore "epikeia" is not a part of justice.~
22   2, 118|         Further, it seems that "epikeia" is the same as modesty.
23   2, 118|         temperance. Therefore ~"epikeia" is not a part of justice.~
24   2, 118|       says (Ethic. v, 10) that "epikeia is a ~kind of justice."~
25   2, 118|         Para. 2/2~Accordingly, "epikeia" is a part of justice taken
26   2, 118|   Wherefore it is evident that "epikeia" is a subjective part of
27   2, 118|   subject to the direction of ~"epikeia." Hence "epikeia" is by
28   2, 118| direction of ~"epikeia." Hence "epikeia" is by way of being a higher
29   2, 118|        1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Epikeia corresponds properly to
30   2, 118|          of more account, then "epikeia" is the more important part
31   2, 118|     regard to the letter, then "epikeia" is a part not of legal ~
32   2, 118|         states (Ethic. v, 10), "epikeia is ~better than a certain,"
33   2, 118|     Reply OBJ 3: It belongs to "epikeia" to moderate something,