Part, Question

 1   1, 1   |  fallacies, can be deduced from a multiplicity of propositions. But Holy ~
 2   1, 1   |        Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The multiplicity of these senses does not
 3   1, 1   | equivocation or any other kind of multiplicity, seeing that these senses ~
 4   1, 14  |         understanding, no kind of multiplicity is attached to His substance.~
 5   1, 31  |         confused; and there is no multiplicity where there is no ~difference."
 6   1, 47  |         equality; and then comes ~multiplicity; and therefore from the
 7   1, 58  |     dividing. For, where there is multiplicity of things understood, there
 8   1, 68  |   Scripture can be explained in a multiplicity of senses, one should ~adhere
 9   1, 76  | consequently we must judge of the multiplicity of a thing as we judge of ~
10   1, 76  |        being. In like manner ~the multiplicity of souls is in proportion
11   1, 76  |           is in proportion to the multiplicity of the ~bodies; yet, after
12   1, 48  |          equality; and then comes multiplicity; and therefore from the
13   1, 59  |     dividing. For, where there is multiplicity of things understood, there
14   1, 69  |   Scripture can be explained in a multiplicity of senses, one should ~adhere
15   1, 75  | consequently we must judge of the multiplicity of a thing as we judge of ~
16   1, 75  |        being. In like manner ~the multiplicity of souls is in proportion
17   1, 75  |           is in proportion to the multiplicity of the ~bodies; yet, after
18   1, 97  |      necessary ~on account of the multiplicity of masters, inasmuch as
19   1, 102 |           to be ill governed; and multiplicity of authorities is a ~bad
20   1, 104 |         and so, according to the ~multiplicity of causes, there results
21   1, 104 |           causes, there results a multiplicity of orders, subjected ~one
22   2, 18  |    fulness of being in a certain ~multiplicity. Wherefore it happens with
23   2, 54  |          we shall ~find a certain multiplicity therein. But since this
24   2, 54  |           therein. But since this multiplicity is ~directed to one thing,
25   2, 90  |       there is the same reason of multiplicity.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[92] A[
26   2, 171 |   ministry of the prophets." ~Now multiplicity of visions results, not
27   3, 27  |         and disengaged it from a ~multiplicity of things (Cf. Dionysius,
28 Suppl, 9 |        vague ~words; thirdly, by "multiplicity" of words, in which respect
29 Suppl, 37|          Para. 1/1~I answer that, Multiplicity of Orders was introduced
30 Suppl, 71|      infinite in duration) that a multiplicity of suffrages would ~take
31 Suppl, 71|         entirely done away by the multiplicity of suffrages. But ~it does