Part, Question

1501   1, 78  |          speaks, is ~something in the soul. In order to make this evident,
1502   1, 78  |           that above the intellectual soul of man we must needs suppose
1503   1, 78  |             intellect, from which the soul acquires the power of understanding.
1504   1, 78  |            and perfect. Now the human soul is called intellectual by ~
1505   1, 78  |               intellect, by which the soul is helped to understand.~
1506   1, 78  |               to assign ~to the human soul some power participating
1507   1, 78  |             by ~which power the human soul makes things actually intelligible.
1508   1, 78  |           more perfect than the human soul. ~Wherefore we must say
1509   1, 78  |               we must say that in the soul is some power derived from
1510   1, 78  |              must be something in the soul. For this reason Aristotle (
1511   1, 78  |             intellect ~impressing the soul to the sun, as Themistius
1512   1, 78  |               God Himself, Who is the soul's Creator, and only beatitude; ~
1513   1, 78  |                  Wherefore the ~human soul derives its intellectual
1514   1, 78  |          cause, from which ~the human soul derives a particular power,
1515   1, 78  |            something belonging to the soul, or something ~separate
1516   1, 78  |          something ~separate from the soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[79] A[
1517   1, 78  |               OBJ 4: The intellectual soul is indeed actually immaterial,
1518   1, 78  |             prevents one and the same soul, inasmuch as it is ~actually
1519   1, 78  |              Since the essence of the soul is immaterial, created by
1520   1, 78  |              from the ~essence of the soul, in the same way as its
1521   1, 78  |           something ~belonging to the soul, but were some separate
1522   1, 78  |            something belonging to the soul, as one of its powers, we
1523   1, 78  |              intellectual part of the soul?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[79] A[
1524   1, 78  |             intellectual part of the ~soul. For Augustine says (De
1525   1, 78  |               the higher part of ~the soul belongs those things which
1526   1, 78  |              intellectual part of the soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[79] A[
1527   1, 78  |            the ~sensitive part of the soul only, but rather in the
1528   1, 78  |            but rather in the body and soul united: ~since the memorative
1529   1, 78  |               Anima iii, 4) that "the soul is ~the seat of the species,
1530   1, 78  |            the species, not the whole soul, but the intellect."~Aquin.:
1531   1, 78  |               the senses. Because our soul's act of ~understanding
1532   1, 78  |           Trin. x, 11) assigns to the soul memory, ~understanding,
1533   1, 78  |               3]), the powers of the ~soul are distinguished by the
1534   1, 78  |              as always present in the soul, whether we actually ~attend
1535   1, 78  |             memory he understands the soul's habit of ~retention; by
1536   1, 78  |          lower. But ~the parts of the soul are its powers. Therefore
1537   1, 78  |               scientific part" of the soul, by which the soul knows
1538   1, 78  |             of the soul, by which the soul knows necessary things, ~
1539   1, 78  |    generically different parts of the soul are ordained." Now ~contingent
1540   1, 78  |              way be two powers of the soul. For he says that "the ~
1541   1, 78  |              two lesser ~parts of the soul - namely, the "scientific"
1542   1, 78  |             remains and ~conforms the soul to that which is understood
1543   1, 78  |             is a special power of the soul distinct from the ~others?~
1544   1, 78  |               spirit accompanying the soul, by which it is led away
1545   1, 78  |            cling to good." But in the soul, spirit designates a power -
1546   1, 78  |            sin, except a power of the soul. ~But conscience is a subject
1547   1, 79  |               a special power of the ~soul?~(2) Whether the appetite
1548   1, 79  |             is a special power of the soul? ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[80] A[
1549   1, 79  |               a special power of the ~soul. For no power of the soul
1550   1, 79  |             soul. For no power of the soul is to be assigned for those
1551   1, 79  |               a special power of the ~soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[80] A[
1552   1, 79  |                But each ~power of the soul desires some particular
1553   1, 79  |              appetitive power to the ~soul. To make this evident, we
1554   1, 79  |             intelligible, so that the soul of man ~is, in a way, all
1555   1, 79  |               appetitive power of the soul, through which the animal
1556   1, 79  |              appetitive power to the ~soul. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[80] A[
1557   1, 79  |            necessary to assign to the soul a particular power.~Aquin.:
1558   1, 79  |              OBJ 3: Each power of the soul is a form or nature, and
1559   1, 79  |         appetite is a movement of the soul to individual things, seemingly ~
1560   1, 79  |               which exist outside the soul, yet tends to them as standing
1561   1, 80  |              sensual ~movement of the soul which is directed to the
1562   1, 80  |               sensual movement of the soul is directed ~to the bodily
1563   1, 80  |            For the same power of the ~soul regards both sides of a
1564   1, 80  |             are the same power in the soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[81] A[
1565   1, 80  |                 one through which the soul is simply inclined to seek ~
1566   1, 80  |         principle: for ~sometimes the soul busies itself with unpleasant
1567   1, 80  |             the rational part ~of the soul, so also is the sensitive
1568   1, 80  |            the sensitive part of ~the soul does not obey reason: for
1569   1, 80  |                that "the part of ~the soul which is obedient and amenable
1570   1, 80  |            politic principle: for the soul dominates the ~body by a
1571   1, 80  |             who commands. And so, the soul is said to rule the body ~
1572   1, 80  |                resist the sway of the soul, but at the soul's command
1573   1, 80  |               of the soul, but at the soul's command both hand and ~
1574   1, 81  |         appears in the powers of ~the soul: for sense precedes the
1575   1, 81  |               good is nobler than the soul itself, in which is the
1576   1, 81  |           good is less noble than the soul, then even ~in comparison
1577   1, 81  |               with what ~is above the soul. For charity is the virtue
1578   1, 81  |            and all the powers ~of the soul, as Anselm says (Eadmer,
1579   1, 81  |          moves ~all the powers of the soul to their respective acts,
1580   1, 81  |              determinate power of the soul having a determinate act.
1581   1, 81  |            parts of the intellectual ~soul as well as in the sensitive.~
1582   1, 81  |           Spiritu et Anima) that "the soul has ~these powers" - namely,
1583   1, 81  |         sensitive part belongs to the soul alone, but to the soul and
1584   1, 81  |            the soul alone, but to the soul and body ~united, as we
1585   1, 81  |               irrational" part of the soul is divided into the desiderative
1586   1, 81  |            the irrational part of the soul are concupiscence and anger,"
1587   1, 81  |              certain commotion of the soul. And thus they are commonly
1588   1, 81  |           passion or commotion of the soul, and thus they are acts
1589   1, 81  |      concupiscible ~powers are in the soul before it is united to the
1590   1, 82  |                that free-will is "the soul's habit of disposing of ~
1591   1, 83  |              Out. Para. 1/5 - HOW THE SOUL WHILE UNITED TO THE BODY
1592   1, 83  |              consider the acts of the soul in regard to the ~intellectual
1593   1, 83  |               the other powers of the soul ~do not come directly under
1594   1, 83  |            the appetitive part of the soul come under the ~consideration
1595   1, 83  |              we shall inquire how the soul understands when united
1596   1, 83  |             be threefold: (1) How the soul ~understands bodies which
1597   1, 83  |              1) Through what does the soul know them? (2) How and ~
1598   1, 83  |              inquiry:~(1) Whether the soul knows bodies through the
1599   1, 83  |               naturally innate in the soul?~(4) Whether these species
1600   1, 83  |            species are derived by the soul from certain separate ~immaterial
1601   1, 83  |     immaterial forms?~(5) Whether our soul sees in the eternal ideas
1602   1, 83  |           Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the soul knows bodies through the
1603   1, 83  |                It would seem that the soul does not know bodies through
1604   1, 83  |          those things that are in the soul by their ~essence. But such
1605   1, 83  |             not bodies. Therefore the soul cannot know bodies ~through
1606   1, 83  |             to ~the sensible. But the soul can by no means, through
1607   1, 83  |            changeable. ~Therefore the soul cannot know bodies through
1608   1, 83  |            that according to this the soul does not ~understand these
1609   1, 83  |              which is external to the soul, and in the senses ~which
1610   1, 83  |             through the intellect the soul knows bodies by ~a knowledge
1611   1, 83  |          species, which can be in the soul by their own essence.~Aquin.:
1612   1, 83  |                Para. 1/1 ~Whether the soul understands corporeal things
1613   1, 83  |                It would seem that the soul understands corporeal things
1614   1, 83  |               De Trin. x, 5) that the soul "collects ~and lays hold
1615   1, 83  |               which are formed in the soul and of ~the soul: for in
1616   1, 83  |               in the soul and of ~the soul: for in forming them it
1617   1, 83  |              own ~substance." But the soul understands bodies by images
1618   1, 83  |             of bodies. ~Therefore the soul knows bodies through its
1619   1, 83  |               Anima iii, 8) that "the soul, ~after a fashion, is everything."
1620   1, 83  |              like, ~it seems that the soul knows corporeal things through
1621   1, 83  |              1/1 ~OBJ 3: Further, the soul is superior to corporeal
1622   1, 83  |             more excellent way in the soul than in themselves. Therefore
1623   1, 83  |            themselves. Therefore the ~soul can know corporeal creatures
1624   1, 83  |               bodily senses." But the soul ~itself cannot be known
1625   1, 83  |            philosophers held that the soul knows bodies ~through its
1626   1, 83  |       observed that the ~intellectual soul has an immaterial nature,
1627   1, 83  |               materially even ~in the soul that knows them. And therefore,
1628   1, 83  |              order to ascribe to the ~soul a knowledge of all things,
1629   1, 83  |      principles, they ascribed to the soul the nature of a principle;
1630   1, 83  |       principle of all, held that the soul had ~the nature of fire;
1631   1, 83  |               movement, said that the soul was composed of these. ~
1632   1, 83  |              that things exist in the soul materially, ~they maintained
1633   1, 83  |               maintained that all the soul's knowledge is material,
1634   1, 83  |        insufficient to ascribe to the soul the nature of ~the principles
1635   1, 83  |              we ~further admit in the soul natures and forms of each
1636   1, 83  |       material existence outside the ~soul should be devoid of knowledge;
1637   1, 83  |             instance, if by fire the ~soul knows fire, that fire also
1638   1, 83  |             also which is outside the soul should not have ~knowledge
1639   1, 83  |              that ~the essence of the soul, that it may know all things,
1640   1, 83  |        Essence: but neither the human soul nor the angels can ~do so.~
1641   1, 83  |         formation ~of such images the soul gives part of its substance,
1642   1, 83  |            some form. In this way the soul makes ~such images from
1643   1, 83  |             from itself; not that the soul or some part of the soul
1644   1, 83  |              soul or some part of the soul be ~turned into this or
1645   1, 83  |         follows. For he says that the soul ~"keeps something" - namely,
1646   1, 83  |       Aristotle did not hold that the soul is actually composed ~of
1647   1, 83  |        philosophers; he said that the soul is ~all things, "after a
1648   1, 83  |           Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the soul understands all things through
1649   1, 83  |                It would seem that the soul understands all things through
1650   1, 83  |             of forms." Therefore ~the soul also has innate species
1651   1, 83  |             Further, the intellectual soul is more excellent than corporeal ~
1652   1, 83  |              more is the intellectual soul ~created by God under intelligible
1653   1, 83  |      intelligible species. And so the soul understands ~corporeal things
1654   1, 83  |                species. Therefore the soul understands corporeal things
1655   1, 83  |           must say that the cognitive soul is in potentiality both
1656   1, 83  |            the intellect by which the soul understands has no innate ~
1657   1, 83  |                First, because, if the soul ~has a natural knowledge
1658   1, 83  |              seems impossible for the soul ~so far to forget the existence
1659   1, 83  |            that it is natural ~to the soul to be united to the body,
1660   1, 83  |          would not be the case if the soul had innate images of ~all
1661   1, 83  |           therefore conclude that the soul does ~not know corporeal
1662   1, 83  |            species are derived by the soul from certain ~separate forms?~
1663   1, 83  |           species are derived by the ~soul from some separate forms.
1664   1, 83  |         thereof. But the intellectual soul ~forasmuch as it is actually
1665   1, 83  |           cause that the intellectual soul actually understands. Now
1666   1, 83  |    intelligible species, by which the soul ~understands, are caused
1667   1, 83  |          exists actually ~outside the soul. Therefore the intelligible
1668   1, 83  |   intelligible, ~existing outside the soul. But these can be nothing
1669   1, 83  |              participated both by our soul and by corporeal ~matter;
1670   1, 83  |             corporeal ~matter; by our soul, to the effect of knowledge
1671   1, 83  |               does not hold ~that the soul has innate knowledge, as
1672   1, 83  |               remain immovably in the soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[84] A[
1673   1, 83  |               can be assigned for the soul ~being united to the body.
1674   1, 83  |           said that the intellectual ~soul is united to the body for
1675   1, 83  |        necessary to the ~intellectual soul, for the latter's proper
1676   1, 83  |             since as to its being the soul does not depend on the body. ~
1677   1, 83  |              on the body. ~But if the soul by its very nature had an
1678   1, 83  |            But if it be said that our soul needs the senses in order
1679   1, 83  |             not seem necessary to the soul, except in as far as it
1680   1, 83  |               use to the intellectual soul except for the purpose of
1681   1, 83  |                the obstacle which the soul encounters through its union
1682   1, 83  |            reason of the union of the soul with the body still ~remains
1683   1, 83  |          senses are necessary to the ~soul, because by them it is aroused
1684   1, 83  |              if it is natural for the soul to understand through ~species
1685   1, 83  |            follows that at times ~the soul of an individual wanting
1686   1, 83  |   intelligible ~species, by which our soul understands, are not derived
1687   1, 83  |          which they have outside ~the soul, may be actually sensible,
1688   1, 83  |              which is a power ~of the soul, as we have said (Q[79],
1689   1, 83  |              Whether the intellectual soul knows material things in
1690   1, 83  |            seem that the intellectual soul does not know material ~
1691   1, 83  |      previously. But the intellectual soul of man, ~in the present
1692   1, 83  |           Theolog. i). Therefore the ~soul does not know all in the
1693   1, 83  |             say that the intellectual soul knows ~all things in the
1694   1, 83  |            Therefore the intellectual soul knows all true things in
1695   1, 83  |            and are known to the human soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[84] A[
1696   1, 83  |              is asked: Does the human soul know all ~things in the
1697   1, 83  |             therein. In this ~way the soul, in the present state of
1698   1, 83  |             needs say that ~the human soul knows all things in the
1699   1, 83  |               each and every rational soul can be said to be ~worthy
1700   1, 83  |            the ~result being that the soul is in a way roused to form
1701   1, 83  |               body feels not, but the soul ~through the body, which
1702   1, 83  |              these rouse the sensible soul to the sentient act, while
1703   1, 83  |            feel is not an ~act of the soul alone, but of the "composite."
1704   1, 83  |         objects which are outside the soul ~should produce some effect
1705   1, 83  |        operation which belongs to the soul only, Augustine, ~in order
1706   1, 83  |              not by bodies but by the soul, uses the same argument
1707   1, 83  |               Anima iii, 7) that "the soul ~understands nothing without
1708   1, 83  |            state of life in which the soul is united ~to a passible
1709   1, 84  |                is to the intellectual soul what color is to the sight.
1710   1, 84  |            things in the intellectual soul - the passive intellect
1711   1, 84  |              yet it is a power of the soul which is the form the body,
1712   1, 84  |              in something outside the soul: for, ~since what is outside
1713   1, 84  |             since what is outside the soul is material, nothing therein
1714   1, 84  |          signs of the passions in the soul." But words signify the
1715   1, 84  |      Therefore these ~passions of the soul - viz. the intelligible
1716   1, 84  |           intelligible species in the soul, it would ~follow that every
1717   1, 84  |             with objects outside the ~soul, but only with the intelligible
1718   1, 84  |       intelligible species within the soul; thus, ~according to the
1719   1, 84  |                For they said that the soul knows the earth outside ~
1720   1, 84  |            that a stone is not in the soul, ~but only the likeness
1721   1, 84  |           stone"; it follows that the soul knows ~external things by
1722   1, 84  |               a body, the better the ~soul allotted to it; which clearly
1723   1, 85  |               ad lit. xii. 13]), ~the soul has a certain power of forecasting,
1724   1, 85  |               were to admit that the ~soul receives knowledge by participating
1725   1, 85  |              because in that case the soul by its nature would know
1726   1, 85  |               is not natural for the ~soul to know the future when
1727   1, 85  |              above (Q[57], A[3]). The soul is naturally more ~inclined
1728   1, 86  |              1 - HOW THE INTELLECTUAL SOUL KNOWS ITSELF AND ALL WITHIN
1729   1, 86  |         consider how the intellectual soul knows itself and all ~within
1730   1, 86  |              inquiry:~(1) Whether the soul knows itself by its own
1731   1, 86  |              Whether the intellectual soul knows itself by its essence?~
1732   1, 86  |            seem that the intellectual soul knows itself by its own ~
1733   1, 86  |               likewise does the human soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[
1734   1, 86  |           that he has an intellectual soul because he perceives that
1735   1, 86  |                know the nature of the soul, comes to us according to
1736   1, 86  |             many are ignorant of ~the soul's nature, and many have
1737   1, 86  |               knows the habits of the soul by their essence?~Aquin.:
1738   1, 86  |               knows the habits of the soul by ~their essence. For Augustine
1739   1, 86  |             wherein it abides, as the soul of a man may be seen by ~
1740   1, 86  |               the other habits of the soul. Therefore the habits of
1741   1, 86  |           Therefore the habits of the soul ~are not known by their
1742   1, 86  |           material things outside the soul are known by their ~likeness
1743   1, 86  |         likeness being present in the soul, and are said therefore
1744   1, 86  |             their likenesses. But the soul's habits are present by
1745   1, 86  |              by their essence in ~the soul. Therefore the habits of
1746   1, 86  |           Therefore the habits of the soul are known by their essence.~
1747   1, 86  |            things to be known by ~the soul. Therefore they are still
1748   1, 86  |               still more known by the soul in themselves.~Aquin.: SMT
1749   1, 86  |           Confess. x, 17) says of the soul's affections that ~"they
1750   1, 86  |              that there can be in the soul any other notions of things
1751   1, 86  |          known such affections of the soul as the ~acts of the will.~
1752   1, 86  |             the same substance of the soul, and since one is in a certain ~
1753   1, 86  |              3: The affections of the soul are in the intellect not
1754   1, 86  |               Augustine says that the soul's ~affections are in the
1755   1, 87  |             Para. 1/1 - HOW THE HUMAN SOUL KNOWS WHAT IS ABOVE ITSELF (
1756   1, 87  |            now consider how the human soul knows what is above itself,
1757   1, 87  |        inquiry:~(1) Whether the human soul in the present state of
1758   1, 87  |           Para. 1/1~Whether the human soul in the present state of
1759   1, 87  |             would seem that the human soul in the present state of
1760   1, 87  |             objects are known by ~the soul inasmuch as phantasy and
1761   1, 87  |       substance; but a faculty of the soul, extending itself actively ~
1762   1, 87  |              knowledge concerning the soul ~is a principle for the
1763   1, 87  |              would be true - that the soul ~needs to have the nature
1764   1, 87  |             OBJ 3: Further, the human soul belongs to the genus of
1765   1, 87  |              1~Reply OBJ 3: The human soul understands itself through
1766   1, 88  |            KNOWLEDGE OF THE SEPARATED SOUL (EIGHT ARTICLES)~We must
1767   1, 88  |            knowledge of the separated soul. Under this ~head there
1768   1, 88  |              inquiry:~(1) Whether the soul separated from the body
1769   1, 88  |               remain?~(6) Whether the soul can use the habit of knowledge
1770   1, 88  |        distance impedes the separated soul's knowledge?~(8) Whether
1771   1, 88  |               1~Whether the separated soul can understand anything?~
1772   1, 88  |                It would seem that the soul separated from the body
1773   1, 88  |             OBJ 2: Further, the human soul is hindered from understanding
1774   1, 88  |             Therefore after death the soul ~understands nothing.~Aquin.:
1775   1, 88  |             Further, if the separated soul can understand, this must
1776   1, 88  |       abstracted and retained in the ~soul; for if that were so, a
1777   1, 88  |               that were so, a child's soul would have no means of ~
1778   1, 88  |               of grace. Therefore the soul apart ~from the body understands
1779   1, 88  |               De Anima i, 1), "If the soul had ~no proper operation,
1780   1, 88  |              from the body." But the ~soul is separated from the body;
1781   1, 88  |           intelligence. Therefore the soul can ~understand when it
1782   1, 88  |               from the ~fact that the soul united to the body can understand
1783   1, 88  |             this not proceed from the soul's ~very nature, but accidentally
1784   1, 88  |            body was once removed, the soul would at once return to
1785   1, 88  |           case, however, the union of soul and body would not ~be for
1786   1, 88  |            body would not ~be for the soul's good, for evidently it
1787   1, 88  |          admit that the nature of the soul ~requires it to understand
1788   1, 88  |            mode of existence. Now the soul has one mode of being when
1789   1, 88  |               beside its ~nature. The soul, therefore, when united
1790   1, 88  |              it is as natural for the soul to understand by turning
1791   1, 88  |               should have ordered the soul's nature so ~that the nobler
1792   1, 88  |             what was possible to ~the soul. This will appear if we
1793   1, 88  |              then that it was for the soul's good that it was united
1794   1, 88  |               a movement ~of body and soul as united, just as sensation
1795   1, 88  |            Reply OBJ 3: The separated soul does not understand by way
1796   1, 88  |             objection proves; but the soul in that state understands
1797   1, 88  |          Divine ~light, shared by the soul as by other separate substances;
1798   1, 88  |           corporeal ~(phantasms), the soul turns at once to the superior
1799   1, 88  |               1~Whether the separated soul understands separate substances?~
1800   1, 88  |               seem that the separated soul does not understand ~separate
1801   1, 88  |          separate substances. For the soul is more perfect when joined
1802   1, 88  |               in that ~whole. But the soul in the body does not understand
1803   1, 88  |     substances cannot be known to the soul by their ~presence, for
1804   1, 88  |              alone can enter into the soul; nor by means of species ~
1805   1, 88  |            species ~abstracted by the soul from an angel, for an angel
1806   1, 88  |          angel is more simple than a ~soul. Therefore the separated
1807   1, 88  |               Therefore the separated soul cannot at all understand
1808   1, 88  |             therefore, the ~separated soul can understand separate
1809   1, 88  |        knowledge which the separated ~soul has of itself, we can judge
1810   1, 88  |               united to the body the ~soul understands by turning to
1811   1, 88  |              existence of a separated soul is inferior to that of an
1812   1, 88  |        separated souls. Therefore the soul apart from the ~body has
1813   1, 88  |            Reply OBJ 1: The separated soul is, indeed, less perfect
1814   1, 88  |            Reply OBJ 2: The separated soul understands the angels by
1815   1, 88  |        forasmuch as the nature of the soul is inferior to that of an ~
1816   1, 88  |         happiness. But the ~separated soul does not understand them
1817   1, 88  |               1~Whether the separated soul knows all natural things?~
1818   1, 88  |               seem that the separated soul knows all natural things. ~
1819   1, 88  |      intelligible. But the separated ~soul understands immaterial substances,
1820   1, 88  |         knowledge than the ~separated soul; yet they do not know all
1821   1, 88  |             neither can the separated soul know all natural things.~
1822   1, 88  |           above (A[1]), the separated soul, like the ~angels, understands
1823   1, 88  |           light. Nevertheless, as the soul by nature is inferior to
1824   1, 88  |             knowledge is natural, the soul apart from the ~body through
1825   1, 88  |              does not follow that the soul knows all natural ~things
1826   1, 88  |               1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As the soul separated from the body
1827   1, 88  |               1~Whether the separated soul knows singulars?~Aquin.:
1828   1, 88  |               seem that the separated soul does not know singulars. ~
1829   1, 88  |             remains in the separated ~soul, as is clear from what has
1830   1, 88  |               Therefore the separated soul cannot know singulars.~Aquin.:
1831   1, 88  |          universal. But the separated soul has no determinate ~knowledge
1832   1, 88  |            neither does the separated soul know it thus; but as ~explained
1833   1, 88  |            knowledge of the separated soul is confined to those ~species
1834   1, 88  |              individuals to which the soul has some kind of determinate ~
1835   1, 88  |            Reply OBJ 3: The separated soul has not the same relation
1836   1, 88  |             remains in the separated ~soul?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
1837   1, 88  |                does not remain in the soul separated from the body:
1838   1, 88  |            knowledge ~remained in the soul after death, it would follow
1839   1, 88  |             remained in the separated soul, it would follow that two
1840   1, 88  |              remain in ~the separated soul, as regards what belongs
1841   1, 88  |             no place in the separated soul. Therefore we must conclude ~
1842   1, 88  |             remains in ~the separated soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
1843   1, 88  |              remains in the separated soul?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
1844   1, 88  |               remain in the separated soul. For the Philosopher says (
1845   1, 88  |               body is corrupted, "the soul neither remembers nor loves." ~
1846   1, 88  |              Therefore ~the separated soul cannot retain an act of
1847   1, 88  |               power in the ~separated soul than they have in the soul
1848   1, 88  |            soul than they have in the soul united to the body. But
1849   1, 88  |               Therefore the separated soul ~cannot do so, and thus
1850   1, 88  |              adapted to the separated soul. Therefore the soul in the ~
1851   1, 88  |         separated soul. Therefore the soul in the ~state of separation
1852   1, 88  |              remain in the separated ~soul, as stated above (A[5]),
1853   1, 88  |            the state of the separated soul ~is not the same as it is
1854   1, 88  |             acquired in this life the soul apart from the body ~can
1855   1, 88  |             but by a mode suited to a soul existing apart ~from the
1856   1, 88  |             remains in the ~separated soul, but in a different way.~
1857   1, 88  |              state of the intelligent soul; not by diversity of species.~
1858   1, 88  |            knowledge in the separated soul?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
1859   1, 88  |        distance impedes the separated soul's ~knowledge. For Augustine
1860   1, 88  |            knowledge in the separated soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
1861   1, 88  |            knowledge of the separated soul, whose nature is ~inferior
1862   1, 88  |            knowledge in the separated soul, for ~the soul is ignorant
1863   1, 88  |              separated soul, for ~the soul is ignorant of the future.
1864   1, 88  |            knowledge in the separated soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[
1865   1, 88  |               held that the separated soul knows the singular ~by abstraction
1866   1, 88  |           would need ~to act upon the soul, or the soul upon the sensible,
1867   1, 88  |             act upon the soul, or the soul upon the sensible, and in
1868   1, 88  |               remain actually in the ~soul apart from the body. But
1869   1, 88  |          apart from the body. But the soul when separated understands ~
1870   1, 88  |            knowledge in the separated soul is not ~hindered by local
1871   1, 88  |              4]), since the separated soul has knowledge of ~singulars,
1872   1, 89  |             FIRST PRODUCTION OF MAN'S SOUL (FOUR ARTICLES)~After the
1873   1, 89  |              the ~production of man's soul; (2) the production of man'
1874   1, 89  |            inquiry:~(1) Whether man's soul was something made, or was
1875   1, 89  |           Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the soul was made or was of God's
1876   1, 89  |                It would seem that the soul was not made, but was God'
1877   1, 89  |            and man was ~made a living soul." But he who breathes sends
1878   1, 89  |                himself. Therefore the soul, whereby man lives, is of
1879   1, 89  |          explained (Q[75], A[5]), the soul is a simple ~form. But a
1880   1, 89  |              is an act. Therefore the soul is a pure act; which ~applies
1881   1, 89  |              God alone. Therefore the soul is of God's substance.~Aquin.:
1882   1, 89  |           opinion that "God ~made the soul not out of nothing, but
1883   1, 89  |          answer that, To say that the soul is of the Divine substance
1884   1, 89  |               Q[84], A[6]), the human soul is sometimes in a state ~
1885   1, 89  |              since they held that the soul ~was of the same nature
1886   1, 89  |               2, it followed that the soul was of ~the nature of God
1887   1, 89  |        corporeal light, held that the soul ~was part of that light
1888   1, 89  |            that Varro said, "God is a soul governing the world by movement ~
1889   1, 89  |                So some supposed man's soul to be part ~of that one
1890   1, 89  |               to be part ~of that one soul, as man is a part of the
1891   1, 89  |              evidently false that the soul is of the ~substance of
1892   1, 89  |             Reply OBJ 2: Although the soul is a simple form in its
1893   1, 89  |           Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the soul was produced by creation?~
1894   1, 89  |                It would seem that the soul was not produced by creation.
1895   1, 89  |        produced from matter. But ~the soul is in part material, since
1896   1, 89  |              pure act. Therefore the ~soul was made of matter; and
1897   1, 89  |           matter potentially. But the soul is the act of ~corporeal
1898   1, 89  |             definition. Therefore the soul is ~educed from the potentiality
1899   1, 89  |               1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the soul is a form. Therefore, if
1900   1, 89  |               form. Therefore, if the soul is created, ~all other forms
1901   1, 89  |             man is like to God in his soul. Therefore the soul was ~
1902   1, 89  |               his soul. Therefore the soul was ~created.~Aquin.: SMT
1903   1, 89  |             answer that, The rational soul can be made only by creation;
1904   1, 89  |              other hand, the rational soul is a subsistent form, as
1905   1, 89  |            Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The soul's simple essence is as the
1906   1, 89  |        necessarily co-exists with the soul's essence, because ~existence
1907   1, 89  |              same reason holds if the soul ~is supposed to be composed
1908   1, 89  |         celestial body; otherwise the soul would be ~corruptible. Wherefore
1909   1, 89  |            corruptible. Wherefore the soul cannot in any way be made
1910   1, 89  |                But since the rational soul does not depend in its ~
1911   1, 89  |      comparison between the ~rational soul and other forms.~Aquin.:
1912   1, 89  |              1/1~Whether the rational soul is produced by God immediately?~
1913   1, 89  |          would seem that the rational soul is not immediately made
1914   1, 89  |              and such is the rational soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[90] A[
1915   1, 89  |              proved that the rational soul cannot be produced ~except
1916   1, 89  |               therefore, the rational soul cannot be produced by a
1917   1, 89  |           Para. 1/1~Whether the human soul was produced before the
1918   1, 89  |             would seem that the human soul was made before the body.
1919   1, 89  |                 Q[70], A[1]). But the soul was made by ~creation; whereas
1920   1, 89  |             adornment. ~Therefore the soul of man was made before the
1921   1, 89  |              2: Further, the rational soul has more in common with
1922   1, 89  |             were made. Therefore ~the soul of man was created before
1923   1, 89  |         beginning. But in the end the soul outlasts the body. Therefore
1924   1, 89  |    potentiality. ~Therefore since the soul is the proper act of the
1925   1, 89  |           proper act of the body, the soul was ~produced in the body.~
1926   1, 89  |                held that not only the soul ~of the first man, but also
1927   1, 89  |               vii, 24), says that the soul of the ~first man was created
1928   1, 89  |           which cannot be said of the soul, because neither was ~it
1929   1, 89  |           Therefore it seems that the soul ~itself, during the work
1930   1, 89  |               the world, but that the soul was already ~created."~Aquin.:
1931   1, 89  |               those who hold that the soul has of itself a ~complete
1932   1, 89  |             administrator. But if the soul is united to the body as ~
1933   1, 89  |             species required. Now the soul, as ~a part of human nature,
1934   1, 89  |           have been unfitting for the soul to be created ~without the
1935   1, 89  |             we may say that the human soul preceded in the ~work of
1936   1, 89  |            saints, both the body ~and soul of the first man were produced
1937   1, 89  |               1/1~Reply OBJ 1: If the soul by its nature were a complete
1938   1, 89  |           reason would prove that the soul ~was created by itself in
1939   1, 89  |             the beginning. But as the soul is naturally the ~form of
1940   1, 89  |         second objection. For ~if the soul had a species of itself
1941   1, 89  |               1~Reply OBJ 3: That the soul remains after the body,
1942   1, 89  |           defect was not due when the soul was first ~created.~
1943   1, 90  |           form, which is the rational soul. Therefore it should not
1944   1, 90  |             has in himself a rational soul ~of the genus of spiritual
1945   1, 90  |              the acts of the rational soul the heavenly body is ~less
1946   1, 90  |             adapted. For the rational soul receives the knowledge of
1947   1, 90  |             say, who suppose that the soul is united to the body by
1948   1, 90  |            human body is the rational soul and its ~operations; since
1949   1, 90  |          suitably proportioned to the soul and its operations.~Aquin.:
1950   1, 90  |              of the human body is the soul itself which is ~the breath
1951   1, 90  |               1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the soul, which is the breath of
1952   1, 90  |           image of God belongs to the soul. But the soul, according
1953   1, 90  |          belongs to the soul. But the soul, according to Augustine ~(
1954   1, 90  |               and that afterwards the soul was infused into the ~formed
1955   1, 90  |           either the body without the soul, or ~the soul without the
1956   1, 90  |             without the soul, or ~the soul without the body, since
1957   1, 90  |              the body depends on the ~soul, and not the soul on the
1958   1, 90  |             on the ~soul, and not the soul on the body.~Aquin.: SMT
1959   1, 90  |       production of the body with the soul; and that ~the subsequent
1960   1, 90  |            And man was made a ~living soul"; which words the Apostle (
1961   1, 90  |               we must ~understand the soul, so that the words, "He
1962   1, 90  |            what goes before; for the ~soul is the form of the body.~
1963   1, 90  |               according to him man's ~soul, which he holds to have
1964   1, 90  |             on the sixth day both the soul of the first man ~was made
1965   1, 90  |               sixth day both body and soul of man were actually made.~
1966   1, 92  |           giving him an ~intellectual soul, which raises him above
1967   1, 92  |            fact ~that the whole human soul is in the whole body, as
1968   1, 92  |             fact that the whole human soul is in the whole body, and
1969   1, 92  |            like to God than the human soul ~in its generic and intellectual
1970   1, 92  |               the image of God in the soul by ~way of a trace. ~Aquin.:
1971   1, 92  |             penetrative ~power of the soul, that is, the faculty of
1972   1, 92  |      extrinsic to the essence of the ~soul; while the species in the
1973   1, 92  |           though not extrinsic to the soul, ~is adventitious to it;
1974   1, 92  |              found in the acts of the soul?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[93] A[
1975   1, 92  |             found in the acts of ~the soul. For Augustine says (De
1976   1, 92  |             is not to be found in the soul's acts.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
1977   1, 92  |           assigns God's image in the ~soul to these three things -
1978   1, 92  |          essence of the intellectual ~soul. Therefore the image of
1979   1, 92  |             extend to the acts of the soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[93] A[
1980   1, 92  |          image of the ~Trinity in the soul to "memory, understanding,
1981   1, 92  |            are "natural powers of the soul," as the Master of the Sentences
1982   1, 92  |             extend to the acts of the soul.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[93] A[
1983   1, 92  |         Trinity always remains in the soul. But ~an act does not always
1984   1, 92  |             in ~the lower part of the soul, in relation to the actual
1985   1, 92  |         Trinity is to be found in the soul, we must look for it where
1986   1, 92  |           must look for it where the ~soul approaches the nearest to
1987   1, 92  |           connecting Both. But in our soul word "cannot exist without ~
1988   1, 92  |             found in the acts of the ~soul, that is, inasmuch as from
1989   1, 92  |             takes three things in the soul ~which are proper to the
1990   1, 92  |             the Trinity exists in the soul in a ~certain degree, as
1991   1, 92  |            some take to mean that the soul ever ~actually understands,
1992   1, 92  |             Thus it is clear that the soul ~always understands and
1993   1, 92  |             xiv, 4): "If the rational soul is made to the image of
1994   1, 92  |               image of God was in the soul from the beginning of its ~
1995   1, 92  |              Divine Trinity is in the soul only by comparison ~with
1996   1, 92  |              Divine Trinity is in the soul ~not only by comparison
1997   1, 92  |         Trinity is to be found in the soul, as shown above (A[7]), ~
1998   1, 92  |               we seek ~trinity in the soul, we seek it in the whole
1999   1, 92  |           seek it in the whole of the soul, without ~separating the
2000   1, 92  |        Trinity is ~to be found in the soul, even as regards temporal