Part, Question
1 2, 74 | regard to the actions of madmen. If, however, the defect
2 2, 76 | altogether, as is the case with madmen and ~imbeciles: but such
3 2, 113 | reason holds good ~with madmen and idiots that have never
4 2, 14 | the case of imbeciles and ~madmen, as stated in the FP, Q[
5 2, 31 | greater, as in the case of madmen. Much more, therefore should
6 2, 43 | naturally foolish, for ~instance madmen who are baptized or those
7 2, 69 | interior, as in the case of madmen and minors - or exterior,
8 2, 86 | just as in imbeciles and madmen. Therefore just as ~imbeciles
9 2, 86 | Therefore just as ~imbeciles and madmen cannot bind themselves to
10 2, 86 | defect of reason, as in madmen and ~imbeciles, who cannot
11 3, 68 | mother's womb?~(12) Whether madmen and imbeciles should be
12 3, 68 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether madmen and imbeciles should be
13 3, 68 | 1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that madmen and imbeciles should not
14 3, 68 | above (A[7]). But since madmen and imbeciles lack the use
15 3, 68 | that he has reason. But ~madmen and imbeciles lack the use
16 3, 68 | baptized, so ~neither should madmen and imbeciles in those cases
17 3, 68 | of reason is suspended in madmen and imbeciles ~more than
18 3, 68 | it should not be given to madmen and ~imbeciles.~Aquin.:
19 3, 68 | answer that, In the matter of madmen and imbeciles a distinction
20 3, 68 | 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Madmen and imbeciles lack the use
21 Suppl, 32| it should be conferred on madmen and imbeciles?~(4) Whether
22 Suppl, 32| sacrament ought to be given to madmen and imbeciles?~Aquin.: SMT
23 Suppl, 32| sacrament should be given to madmen and ~imbeciles. For these
24 Suppl, 32| Now this does not apply to madmen and imbeciles. ~Therefore
25 Suppl, 32| acknowledge it, and especially to madmen and imbeciles, who might ~
26 Suppl, 72| hither and thither ~like madmen; on the "fifteenth" day
27 Suppl, 79| Hence we do not say that madmen or other witless persons (
|