Part, Question

 1   1, 31|      1~OBJ 3: Further, every trine is threefold. But in God
 2   1, 31|     Trinity cannot be called trine; otherwise there would be
 3   1, 31|     When we say, "Trinity is trine," by reason of the number ~
 4   1, 31|      itself; since ~the word trine imports a distinction in
 5   1, 31|     said that the Trinity is trine; otherwise ~it follows that,
 6   1, 31|      that, if the Trinity be trine, there would be three ~"
 7   1, 31|      as when we say, "God is trine," it follows ~that there
 8   1, 32|    persons, He is called the Trine ~God. Therefore, if in God
 9   1, 32|    by unity ~of essence, and trine by trinity of persons, nevertheless
10   3, 66|     for Baptism?~(8) Whether trine immersion is necessary?~(
11   3, 66|      Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether trine immersion is essential to
12   3, 66|     1/1~OBJ 1: It seems that trine immersion is essential to
13   3, 66|      Therefore it seems that trine immersion is essential to
14   3, 66|  from Christ's ~mandate. But trine immersion was commanded
15   3, 66|    the Trinity and also with trine ~immersion." Therefore,
16   3, 66|      essential to baptize by trine immersion.~Aquin.: SMT TP
17   3, 66|       1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if trine immersion be not essential
18   3, 66|    sacrament of Baptism, and trine ~immersion is essential
19   3, 66|      an infant with either a trine or a ~single immersion:
20   3, 66|    explains, both single and trine ~immersion are lawful considered
21   3, 66|    and of the Godhead; while trine ~immersion signifies the
22   3, 66| confer baptism ~not with the trine immersion in the one administration,
23   3, 66|      this motive has ceased, trine immersion is universally ~
24   3, 66|     Christ's Passion, is the trine ~immersion essential to
25   3, 66|      Pelagius understood the trine immersion to be ordained ~
26   3, 66|      confer one Baptism by a trine ~immersion. Wherefore Jerome