Part, Question
1 1, 3 | because every composite is posterior to its component ~parts,
2 1, 3 | potentiality is absolutely ~posterior to actuality, as is clear
3 1, 3 | that which participates is posterior to that which is essential,
4 1, 3 | fire in ignited objects is ~posterior to fire that is essentially
5 1, 9 | absolutely, potentiality is posterior to act. Now everything which
6 1, 14 | Metaph. x). But what is posterior and ~measured cannot be
7 1, 39 | appropriated. Thus color is ~posterior to body considered as body,
8 1, 42 | from a ~principle to be posterior to its principle may be
9 1, 42 | intellectual word not ~being posterior to its source except in
10 1, 46 | since what is prior and posterior in duration constitutes
11 1, 76 | the contrary, Accident is posterior to substance, both in the
12 1, 39 | appropriated. Thus color is ~posterior to body considered as body,
13 1, 42 | from a ~principle to be posterior to its principle may be
14 1, 42 | intellectual word not ~being posterior to its source except in
15 1, 47 | since what is prior and posterior in duration constitutes
16 1, 75 | the contrary, Accident is posterior to substance, both in the
17 2, 3 | and at the end ~of the Posterior Analytics (ii, 15). Wherefore
18 2, 49 | act, it follows that it is posterior to power. And so habit ~
19 2, 50 | to ~operation, which is posterior, since nature is the principle
20 2, 50 | operation. Wherefore it is posterior to power. ~Or, we may say
21 2, 51 | Philosopher at the end of the ~Posterior Analytics shows that knowledge
22 2, 110 | understood without what is posterior. Hence it follows ~that
23 2, 111 | effect. And as one effect is ~posterior to this effect, and prior
24 3, 1 | is prior in time though posterior in nature. And thus the
25 3, 6 | that is assumed ~which is posterior in nature. Now a thing is
26 Suppl, 44| defined ~from things that are posterior simply, but prior to us;
|