Part, Question
1 1, 1 | prove their principles nor dispute with those ~who deny them,
2 1, 1 | them, viz. metaphysics, can dispute with one who denies its
3 1, 1 | nothing, it can have no dispute with him, though it can
4 1, 1 | science above itself, ~can dispute with one who denies its
5 2, 74 | he may wish to preach or dispute ~about it. Consequently
6 2, 10 | 7) Whether we ought to dispute about faith with unbelievers?~(
7 2, 10 | 1/1~Whether one ought to dispute with unbelievers in public?~
8 2, 10 | seem that one ought not to dispute with unbelievers in ~public.
9 2, 10 | But it is ~impossible to dispute with unbelievers publicly
10 2, 10 | Therefore one ought not to dispute publicly with unbelievers.~
11 2, 10 | anyone ventures to ~debate or dispute in public about matters
12 2, 10 | grave sin to presume to dispute in public about matters
13 2, 10 | Therefore one ought not to dispute in public about matters
14 2, 10 | intention. ~For if he were to dispute as though he had doubts
15 2, 10 | it is praiseworthy to ~dispute about the faith in order
16 2, 10 | case it is necessary to dispute in ~public about the faith,
17 2, 10 | case it is dangerous to dispute in public about the faith, ~
18 2, 10 | Reply OBJ 3: One ought to dispute about matters of faith,
19 2, 10 | necessary ~sometimes to dispute with unbelievers, sometimes
20 2, 11 | question of faith is in dispute, ~I think, that all our
21 2, 36 | are first challenged to ~dispute." Therefore contention is
22 2, 36 | persons and the matter in dispute, for then it would be praiseworthy, ~
23 2, 36 | the persons and matter in dispute, in which case it is ~blameworthy.~
24 2, 36 | here denotes an ordinary dispute. For Job had ~said (13:3): "
25 2, 152 | equally liable to cause dispute between Jews and ~Gentiles,
26 Suppl, 72| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This dispute among the good angels does
|