Part, Question

 1   3, 16|  Whether Christ may be called a lordly man?~(4) Whether what belongs
 2   3, 16|  Whether Christ can be called a lordly man?~[*The question is hardly
 3   3, 16|         as 'homo ~dominicus' (a lordly man)].~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
 4   3, 16|     that Christ can be called a lordly man. For ~Augustine says (
 5   3, 16|      the goods that were in the Lordly Man"; and he is speaking
 6   3, 16|         seems that Christ was a lordly man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16]
 7   3, 16| denominatively that this man is lordly.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
 8   3, 16|         1/1~OBJ 3: Further, as "lordly" is derived from "lord,"
 9   3, 16|   reason may Christ be called a lordly ~man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16]
10   3, 16|     rightly call Jesus Christ a lordly man, since He is the Lord
11   3, 16|     union. Hence, since we say "lordly" denominatively ~from lord,
12   3, 16|        be said that this Man is lordly, ~but rather that He is
13   3, 16|        this man might be called lordly, inasmuch as he is assumed
14   3, 16|          that Christ Jesus is a lordly man, "I ~wish it unsaid,
15   3, 16|       say ~that He was called a lordly man by reason of the human
16   3, 16|         not say a "deified" or "lordly" man.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16]
17   3, 16|     mode of signification. But "lordly" is not ~predicated of those
18   3, 16|       call a man who is a lord, lordly; but whatsoever belongs
19   3, 16|    belongs to a lord is ~called lordly, as the "lordly will," or
20   3, 16|          called lordly, as the "lordly will," or the "lordly hand,"
21   3, 16|      the "lordly will," or the "lordly hand," or the "lordly ~possession."
22   3, 16|      the "lordly hand," or the "lordly ~possession." And hence
23   3, 16|         Lord, cannot be called ~lordly; yet His flesh can be called "
24   3, 16|        His flesh can be called "lordly flesh" and His passion the ~"
25   3, 16|    flesh" and His passion the ~"lordly passion."~Aquin.: SMT TP