Part, Question

 1   1, 1   | believe their authors have not erred in any way ~in writing them.
 2   1, 7   |   principle. ~But because some erred concerning the nature of
 3   1, 7   |         as a ~consequence they erred also concerning its infinity;
 4   1, 14  |       I answer that, Some have erred on this point, saying that
 5   1, 25  |    this matter certain persons erred in two ways. Some ~laid
 6   1, 28  |      that Gilbert de la Porree erred on this ~point, but revoked
 7   1, 39  |        this, the abbot Joachim erred in asserting ~that as we
 8   1, 39  |        this, the abbot Joachim erred in asserting that as we
 9   1, 86  |        s nature, and many have erred about it. So Augustine says (
10   2, 34  |         They seem to have thus erred through ~not discriminating
11   2, 66  |       4:9. And here the Stoics erred, for they ~held that no
12   2, 102 |   legal rite, when the ~priest erred in his judgment.~Aquin.:
13   2, 108 |      The Scribes and Pharisees erred about the judicial precepts ~
14   2, 108 |        2/2~In another way they erred by thinking that certain
15   2, 1   |        which points some ~have erred. Therefore, among the articles
16   3, 72  |        known to have been conf erred in apostolic times by others ~
17   3, 78  |    above ~opinion seem to have erred. Hence it must be understood
18   3, 80  |         In the past, some have erred upon this point, saying
19   3, 84  |     regards Penance, some have erred, saying that a man ~cannot
20   3, 84  |      mortally. ~Secondly, they erred in their estimation of the
21   3, 84  |      be forgiven. In this they erred not only with ~regard to
22 Suppl, 76|    this point the philosophers erred and certain modern ~heretics
23 Suppl, 76|   reunited to bodies, yet they erred in this in two ways. ~First,
24 Suppl, 78|       growth if nature had not erred or ~failed: and the Divine
25 Suppl, 96|         Cf. FP, ~Q[64], A[2]] "erred in maintaining that the