Part, Question
1 1, 14| divine knowledge there is no discursion; the proof ~of which is
2 1, 14| knowledge there is a twofold discursion: ~one is according to succession
3 1, 14| while the other ~mode of discursion is according to causality,
4 1, 14| conclusions. The first kind of discursion ~cannot belong to God. For
5 1, 14| Likewise the second mode of discursion cannot be ~applied to God.
6 1, 14| because this second mode of discursion presupposes ~the first mode;
7 1, 14| their causes; and then the discursion ceases. Hence as God ~sees
8 1, 58| 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Discursion expresses movement of a
9 1, 58| present, ~yet without any discursion withal.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
10 1, 58| would never ~understand by discursion and reasoning. In like manner,
11 1, 58| intellect understands by discursion, and by composing and ~dividing,
12 1, 59| reason ~knows by a process of discursion from one thing to another.
13 1, 59| another. Nevertheless ~by such discursion reason comes to know what
14 1, 59| 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Discursion expresses movement of a
15 1, 59| present, ~yet without any discursion withal.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
16 1, 59| would never ~understand by discursion and reasoning. In like manner,
17 1, 59| intellect understands by discursion, and by composing and ~dividing,
18 1, 60| reason ~knows by a process of discursion from one thing to another.
19 1, 60| another. Nevertheless ~by such discursion reason comes to know what
20 3, 11| they imply comparison and discursion. Therefore ~it seems that
21 3, 11| man needs comparison and discursion of reason in order ~to find
22 3, 11| consists in comparison and ~discursion from one thing to another.
23 3, 11| This reason rests upon discursion and comparison, as used ~
24 3, 11| hence to ~use comparison and discursion is connatural to the souls
25 3, 11| phantasms, and by comparison and discursion.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[11] A[
|