Part, Question
1 1, 3 | false: "For men gave the ~incommunicable name to stones and wood" (
2 1, 13| written: "They gave the incommunicable name to ~wood and stones" (
3 1, 13| Therefore ~this name "God" is incommunicable.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[13] A[
4 1, 13| signify any singular thing is incommunicable both ~in reality and idea;
5 1, 13| that this name "God" is ~incommunicable in reality, but communicable
6 1, 13| name would be absolutely incommunicable; as, for instance, perhaps ~
7 1, 13| our mind. And yet it is incommunicable according to the truth of ~
8 1, 13| For this name "God" is an incommunicable name. But this name HE WHO ~
9 1, 13| name HE WHO ~IS, is not an incommunicable name. Therefore this name
10 1, 13| substance of God itself, ~incommunicable and, if one may so speak,
11 1, 29| Person" in ~God is "the incommunicable existence of the divine
12 1, 29| individual - i.e. distinct and incommunicable ~substance - includes the
13 1, 30| common is the opposite to the incommunicable. But ~the very meaning of
14 1, 30| of person is that it is incommunicable; as appears from ~the definition
15 1, 30| person" contains the word ~"incommunicable." Others thought it to be
16 1, 30| OBJ 2: Although person is incommunicable, yet the mode itself of ~
17 1, 30| yet the mode itself of ~incommunicable existence can be common
18 2, 92| or ~their kings, gave the incommunicable name [Vulg.: 'names'],"
19 2, 95| that it is ~singular and incommunicable. Consequently to give divine
20 3, 3 | nature of a person to ~be incommunicable, as was said above (FP,
21 3, 3 | Divine Person is said to be incommunicable inasmuch as It ~cannot be
22 3, 16| is God." For God is an ~incommunicable name; hence (Wis. 13:10;
23 3, 16| the name of God, which is incommunicable, to wood and stones. ~Hence
24 3, 64| this, if such a power were incommunicable. Therefore Christ ~could
|